The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A retrospective study on related factors affecting the survival rate of dental implants

  • Jang, Hee-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Center, Seoul Veterans Hospital) ;
  • Kang, Jeong-Kyung (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Center, Seoul Veterans Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Ki (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Center, Seoul Veterans Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Sang (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Center, Seoul Veterans Hospital) ;
  • Park, Pil-Kyoo (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Center, Seoul Veterans Hospital)
  • Received : 2011.09.17
  • Accepted : 2011.11.28
  • Published : 2011.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim of this retrospective study is to analyze the relationship between local factors and survival rate of dental implant which had been installed and restored in Seoul Veterans Hospital dental center for past 10 years. And when the relationship is found out, it could be helpful to predict the prognosis of dental implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective study of patients receiving root-shaped screw-type dental implants placed from January 2000 to December 2009 was conducted. 6385 implants were placed in 3755 patients. The following data were collected from the dental records and radiographs: patient's age, gender, implant type and surface, length, diameter, location of implant placement, bone quality, prosthesis type. The correlations between these data and survival rate were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed with the use of Kaplan-Meier analysis, Chi-square test and odds ratio. RESULTS. In all, 6385 implants were placed in 3755 patients (3120 male, 635 female; mean age $65{\pm}10.58$ years). 108 implants failed and the cumulative survival rate was 96.33%. There were significant differences in age, implant type and surface, length, location and prosthesis type (P<.05). No significant differences were found in relation to the following factors: gender, diameter and bone quality (P>.05). CONCLUSION. Related factors such as age, implant type, length, location and prosthesis type had a significant effect on the implant survival.

Keywords

References

  1. Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
  2. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1-132.
  3. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  4. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Longterm follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-59.
  5. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-72. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  6. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Thomsen P, Worthington HV. A 5-year follow-up comparative analysis of the efficacy of various osseointegrated dental implant systems: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:557-68.
  7. el Askary AS, Meffert RM, Griffin T. Why do dental implants fail? Part I. Implant Dent 1999;8:173-85. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199908020-00011
  8. el Askary AS, Meffert RM, Griffin T. Why do dental implants fail? Part II. Implant Dent 1999;8:265-77. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199903000-00008
  9. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-70. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  10. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:721-64. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-6-.x
  11. Tonetti MS, Schmid J. Pathogenesis of implant failures. Periodontol 2000 1994;4:127-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1994.tb00013.x
  12. Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, Engevall S, Engquist B, Eriksson AR, Feldmann G, Freiberg N, Glantz PO, Kjellman O, et al. Osseointegrated oral implants. A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol 1988;59:287-96. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1988.59.5.287
  13. Lekholm U, Zarb, G. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA & Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue integrated prosheses: Osseointegration in clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co, 1985. p. 199-209.
  14. Tricio J, Laohapand P, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I. Mechanical state assessment of the implant-bone continuum: a better understanding of the Periotest method. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:43-9.
  15. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP, Peters F, Simpson JP. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acidetched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:144-53. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x
  16. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:33-40. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010105.x
  17. Kim SH, Kim SJ, Lee KW, Han DH. The effects of local factors on the survival rate of dental implants: A 19 year retrospective study. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010;48:28-40. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2010.48.1.28
  18. Bryant SR. The effects of age, jaw site, and bone condition on oral implant outcomes. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:470-90.
  19. Shirota T, Ohno K, Suzuki K, Michi K. The effect of aging on the healing of hydroxylapatite implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:51-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80390-8
  20. Smith RA, Berger R, Dodson TB. Risk factors associated with dental implants in healthy and medically compromised patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:367-72.
  21. Schwartz-Arad D, Laviv A, Levin L. Failure causes, timing, and cluster behavior: an 8-year study of dental implants. Implant Dent 2008;17:200-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3181777906
  22. Wagenberg B, Froum SJ. A retrospective study of 1925 consecutively placed immediate implants from 1988 to 2004. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:71-80.
  23. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:35-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01349.x
  24. Ivanoff CJ, Grondahl K, Sennerby L, Bergstrom C, Lekholm U. Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:173-80.
  25. Mordenfeld MH, Johansson A, Hedin M, Billstrom C, Fyrberg KA. A retrospective clinical study of wide-diameter implants used in posterior edentulous areas. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:387-92.
  26. Shin SW, Bryant SR, Zarb GA. A retrospective study on the treatment outcome of wide-bodied implants. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:52-8.
  27. Misch CE. Short dental implants: a literature review and rationale for use. Dent Today 2005;24:64-6, 68.
  28. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:121-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00212-9
  29. Bryant SR, MacDonald-Jankowski D, Kim K. Does the type of implant prosthesis affect outcomes for the completely edentulous arch? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:117-39.
  30. Weber HP, Sukotjo C. Does the type of implant prosthesis affect outcomes in the partially edentulous patient? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:140-72.
  31. Meredith N, Shagaldi F, Alleyne D, Sennerby L, Cawley P. The application of resonance frequency measurements to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:234-43. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080310.x
  32. Huwiler MA, Pjetursson BE, Bosshardt DD, Salvi GE, Lang NP. Resonance frequency analysis in relation to jawbone characteristics and during early healing of implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:275-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01336.x
  33. Rabel A, Kohler SG, Schmidt-Westhausen AM. Clinical study on the primary stability of two dental implant systems with resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2007;11:257-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0115-2
  34. O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:85-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00110.x
  35. Alves CC, Neves M. Tapered implants: from indications to advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29:161-7.
  36. Iezzi G, Degidi M, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Piattelli A. Bone response to submerged, unloaded implants inserted in poor bone sites: a histological and histomorphometrical study of 8 titanium implants retrieved from man. J Oral Implantol 2005;31:225-33. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2005)31[225:BRTSUI]2.0.CO;2
  37. Cochran DL. The evidence for immediate loading of implants. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2006;6:155-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2006.04.018
  38. Esposito M, Hirsch J, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Differential diagnosis and treatment strategies for biologic complications and failing oral implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:473-90.
  39. Balshe AA, Eckert SE, Koka S, Assad DA, Weaver AL. The effects of smoking on the survival of smooth- and rough-surface dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:1117-22.
  40. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:527-51. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-2-.x

Cited by

  1. Physical stability of arginine-glycine-aspartic acid peptide coated on anodized implants after installation vol.5, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.84
  2. Investigation of the Risk Factors Associated With the Survival Rate of Dental Implants pp.1056-6163, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000079
  3. Prosthetic Rehabilitation Using Short Dental Implants Associated With Homogenous Bone Graft vol.26, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001369
  4. Effect of Bisphosphonate and Age on Implant Failure as Determined by Patient-Reported Outcomes vol.41, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-14-00195
  5. Dental implants inserted in male versus female patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.42, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12308
  6. A Xenogenic Bone Derivative as a Potential Adjuvant for Bone Regeneration and Implant Osseointegration: An In Vitro Study vol.14, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-017-0029-2
  7. Dental implant loss in older versus younger patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies vol.44, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12465
  8. Analysis of implant loss risk factors especially in maxillary molar location: A retrospective study of 6977 implants in Chinese individuals pp.15230899, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12697
  9. Incidence and pattern of implant fractures: A long-term follow-up multicenter study vol.20, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12621
  10. Oral bacterial colonization on dental implants restored with titanium or zirconia abutments: 6-month follow-up vol.22, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2334-0
  11. Scoping Review of the Role of Shared Decision Making in Dental Implant Consultations vol.3, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1177/2380084418761340
  12. Preliminary Study to Evaluate Marginal Bone Loss in Cases of 2- and 3-Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Prostheses of the Posterior Mandible : vol.30, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000004855
  13. An Evaluation of Success Factors in Dental Implant Treatment vol.24, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.21673/anadoluklin.466020
  14. The influence of Cisplatin‐based chemotherapy on the osseointegration of dental implants: An in vivo mechanical and histometrical study vol.30, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13445
  15. Clinical Evaluation of Three Surgical Modalities in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial vol.8, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8070966
  16. Effects of cortical bone thickness and trabecular bone density on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants vol.14, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2019.06.002