DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Time-domain analysis of nonlinear motion responses and structural loads on ships and offshore structures: development of WISH programs

  • Published : 2011.03.31

Abstract

The present paper introduced a computer program, called WISH, which is based on a time-domain Rankine panel method. The WISH has been developed for practical use to predict the linear and nonlinear ship motion and structural loads in waves. The WISH adopts three different levels of seakeeping analysis: linear, weakly-nonlinear and weak-scatterer approaches. Later, WISH-FLEX has been developed to consider hydroelasticity effects on hull-girder structure. This program can solve the springing and whipping problems by coupling between the hydrodynamic and structural problems. More recently this development has been continued to more diverse problems, including the motion responses of multiple adjacent bodies, the effects of seakeeping in ship maneuvering, and the floating-body motion in finite-depth domain with varying bathymetry. This paper introduces a brief theoretical and numerical background of the WISH package, and some validation results. Also several applications to real ships and offshore structures are shown.

Keywords

References

  1. Bishop, R.E.D. and Price, W.G., 1979. Hydroelasticity of Ships. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  2. Huang, Y., 1998. Nonlinear Ship Motions by a Rankine Panel Method. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
  3. ISSC, 2000. Extreme hull girder loading. Proceedings of the 14th International Ship Structure Committee, ISSC(2000), Nagasaki, Japan.
  4. Jensen, J.J. and Dogliani, M., 1996. Wave-induced ship hull vibrations in stochastic seaways. Marine Structures, 9(3), pp. 353-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8339(95)00031-3
  5. Kim, K.H. Kim, Y. and Kim, Y., 2008. WISH JIP Phase 1 project report and user's manual. Project Report, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  6. Kim, K.H. Kim, Y. and Kim, M.S., 2009a. Numerical analysis on motion responses of adjacent multiple floating bodies by using Rankine panel method. International Journal of Offshore and Ocean Engineering, 19(2), pp. 90-96.
  7. Kim, Y. Kim, K.H. and Kim, Y., 2009b. Analysis of hydroelasticity of floating ship-like structure in time domain using a fully coupled hybrid BEM-FEM. Journal of Ship Research, 53(1), pp. 31-47.
  8. Kim, K.H. Kim, Y., 2009c. Time-domain analysis of nonlinear ship motion responses based on weak-scatterer hypothesis, Proceedings of the 19th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Osaka, Japan.
  9. Kim, K.H. and Kim, Y. 2010a. Comparative study on ship hydrodynamics based on Neumann-Kelvin and doublebody linearizations in time-domain analysis, International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 20(4), pp.265- 274
  10. Kim, Y. Kim, Y. Kang, B.C. and Kim, K.H., 2010b. Study on global ship hydroelasticity by using a fully coupled BEMFEM in time domain. Proceedings of the 28th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Pasadena, USA.
  11. Kring, D. Huang, Y.F. Sclavounos, P. Vada, T. and Braathen, A., 1996. Nonlinear ship motions and wave-induced loads by a Rankine panel method. Proceedings of the 21st Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Trondheim, Norway pp. 45-63.
  12. Lin, W.M. and Yue, D.K., 1990. Numerical solutions for largeamplitude ship motions in time domain. Proceedings of the 18th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Ann Arbor, MI. USA, pp. 41-66.
  13. Lin, W.M. Meinhold, M. Salvensen, N. and Yue, D.K., 1994. Large-amplitude motions and wave loads for ship design. Proceedings of the $20^{th}$ Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, pp. 205-206.
  14. Malenica, S. Molin, B. and Senjanociv, I., 2003. Hydroelastic response of a barge to impulsive and non-impulsive wave loads. Proceedings of the Hydroelasticity Conference, Oxford, UK.
  15. O'Dea, J. Powers, E. and Zselecsky, J., 1992. Experimental determination of nonlinearities in vertical place ship motions. Proceedings of the 19th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Seoul, Korea, pp. 73-90.
  16. Pawlowski, J., 1992. A nonlinear theory of ship motions in waves. Proceedings of the 19th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Seoul, Korea.
  17. Price, W.G. and Temarel, P., 1982. The influence of hull flexibility in the anti-symmetric dynamic behavior of ships in waves. International Shipbuilding Progress, 29, pp.318-326.
  18. Seo, M.G. and Kim, Y., 2011. Numerical analysis on ship maneuvering coupled with ship motion in waves. (Submitted for publication)
  19. Singh, S.P. and Sen, D., 2007. A comparative linear and nonlinear ship motion study using 3-D time domain methods. Ocean Engineering, 34, pp.1863-1881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2006.10.016
  20. Song, M.J. Kim, K.H. and Kim, Y., 2011. Numerical analysis and validation of weakly nonlinear ship motions and structural loads on a modern containership, Ocean Engineering, 38, pp. 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.09.017
  21. Vidic-Perunovic, J., 2005. Springing response due to bidirectional wave excitation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
  22. Voogt, A.J., 2005. Second order effects in extreme waves and shallow water waves. Proceeding of the 2nd International Workshop on Applied Offshore Hydrodynamics, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  23. Waals, O., 2009. On the application of advanced wave analysis in shallow water model testing (Wave Splitting). Proceeding of the 28th International Conference of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Hawaii, USA.
  24. Watanabe, I. and Guedes Soares, C., 1999. Comparative study on the time-domain analysis of non-linear ship motions and loads. Marine Structures, 12, pp. 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8339(99)00012-X
  25. Wu, M.K. and Moan, T., 1996. Linear and nonlinear hydroelastic analysis of high-speed vessel. Journal of Ship Research, 40(2), pp. 149-63.
  26. Yasukawa, H. and Nakayama, Y., 2009. 6-DOF motion simulations of a turning ship in regular waves. Proceedings of the International Conference on Marine Simulation and Ship Manoeuvrability, Panama City, Panama.

Cited by

  1. A time-domain higher-order boundary element method for 3D forward-speed radiation and diffraction problems vol.19, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-013-0242-1
  2. Panel generation framework for seakeeping analysis of multiple bodies and offshore structures vol.31, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-013-0341-y
  3. Time domain simulations of the wave-induced motions of ships in maneuvering condition vol.21, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-015-0340-3
  4. Investigation of hydroelastic ship responses of an ULOC in head seas vol.30, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-016-0044-4