Recognition and Utilization of Physical Therapists for Assistive Technology

물리치료사의 보조공학에 대한 인식과 활용

  • Jeong, Dong-Hoon (Department of Rehabilitation Technology, Korea Nazarene University)
  • 정동훈 (나사렛대학교 재활공학과)
  • Received : 2011.02.14
  • Accepted : 2011.03.31
  • Published : 2011.04.25

Abstract

Purpose: This study was designed to investigate the level of recognition and utilization of Korean physical therapists for assistive technology. Methods: The subjects of this study were 218 physical therapists who worked in various institutions in Seoul, Kyonggi-do, and Choongchung area. A questionnaire was developed using a related article. Simple descriptive statistics were used for respondent characteristics, and for the level of recognition and utilization. Results: The physical therapists reported having a less-than-average level of recognition and utilization for assistive technology. They were cognizant that the use of assistive technology devices were used mainly for specific outcome such as mobility, seating and position, and ADL. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that physical therapists need more opportunities for training in assistive technology. For effective clinical applications of assistive technology, there should be continuous support, such as college education, continued education, and related seminars.

Keywords

References

  1. Jeong DH. An analysis of the research trends on the assistive technology in Korea: focused on journal in related to special education and rehabilitation from 1998 to 2008. Korean Journal of Physical and Multiple Disabilities. 2009;52(1):97-124.
  2. Long TM, Perry DF. Pediatric physical therapist's perceptions of their training in assistive technology. Phys Ther. 2008;88(5):629-39. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20060356
  3. Dell AG, Newton DA, Petroff JG. Assistive technology in the classroom. New Jersey, Pearson, 2008:4-5.
  4. Chaves ES, Cooper RA, Collins DM et al. Review of the use of physical restraints and lap belts with wheelchair users. Assist Technol. 2007;19(2):94-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2007.10131868
  5. Roosmalen L, Reed MP, Bettocci GE. Pilot study of safety belt usability for vehicle occupants seated in wheelchairs. Assist Technol. 2005;17(1):23-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2005.10132093
  6. Buning ME, Getchell CA, Bettocci GE et al. Riding a bus while seated in a wheelchair: a pilot study of attitudes and behavior regarding safety practices. Assist Technol. 2007;19(4):166-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2007.10131874
  7. Fitzgerald SG, Songer T, Rotko KA et al. Motor vehicle transportation use and related adverse events among persons who use wheelchairs. Assist Technol. 2007;19(4):180-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2007.10131875
  8. Burton M, Nieuwenhuijsen ER, Epstein MJ. Computerrelated assistive technology: satisfaction and experiences among users with disabilities. Assist Technol. 2008;20(2):99-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2008.10131936
  9. Mukherjee A, Chakraborty K, Basu A. SweepSticks: an adaptive virtual mouse for people with neuromotor disorders. Assist Technol. 2007;19(3):111-24.
  10. Hunnicutt S, Magnuson T, Medsci L. Grammar-guided writing for AAC users. Assistive technology the official journal of RESNA. 2007;19(3):128-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2007.10131870
  11. Duerstock BS. Accessible microscopy workstation for students and scientists with mobility impairments. Assist Technol. 2006;18(1):34-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2006.10131905
  12. Kulyukin V, Gharpure C, Coste D. Robot-assisted shopping for the visually impaired: proof-of-concept design and feasibility evaluation. Assist Technol. 200820(2):86-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2008.10131935
  13. Michaud F, Salter T, Duquertte A, et al. Perspectives on mobile robots as tools for child development and pediatric rehabilitation. Assist Technol. 2007;19(1):21-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2007.10131863
  14. Chau T. Intelligent systems in pediatric rehabilitation. Assist Technol. 2007;19(1):17-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2007.10131862
  15. Guerette P, Tefft D, Furumasu J. Pediatric powered wheelchairs: result of a national survey of providers. Assist Technol. 2005;17(2):144-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2005.10132104
  16. Hall K, Partnoy J, Tenenbaum S et al. Power mobility driving training for seniors: a pilot study. Assist Technol. 2005;17(1):47-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2005.10132095
  17. Pettersson I, Ahlstrom G, Tornquist K. The value of an outdoor powered wheelchair with regard to the quality of life of persons with stroke: a follow-up study. Assist Technol. 2007;19(3):143-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2007.10131871
  18. Dry A, Colantonio A, Cameron JI et al. Technology in the lives of women who live with memory impairment as a result of a traumatic brain injury. Assist Technol. 2006;18(2):170-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2006.10131916
  19. Chan SC, Chan AP. The validity and applicability of the Chinese version of the Qubec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology for people with spinal cord injury. Assist Technol. 2006;18(1):25-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2006.10131904
  20. Chang MY, Kwon HC, Kim KM. A study on the practical degree of use toward assistive technology for occupational therapists. The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy. 2008;16(1):99-107.
  21. Chang MY, Jung HY. Delphimethod on course subjects for occupational therapists as assistive technology practitioners: assistive technology services in general and for the age. The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy. 2010;18(2):39-62.
  22. Chae SY, Jo SJ, Kwon HC. The level of awareness the necessity of assistive technology among vocational rehabilitation specialists. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science. 2007;46(4):327-46.
  23. Oh KS, Oh DY, NamSH. A study on the actual situation and service needs concerning utilization of assistive technology for effective outcome of vocational rehabilitation. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 2006;16(2):136-56.
  24. Jeong DH. Exploring and suggestion about a field of assistive technology. Intelligence & Creation. 2009;12:237-70.
  25. Hwang KC, Chang MY, Kwon HC. The study on cognition and use degree toward assistive technology of special education teachers who are working at Daegu and Busan.Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science. 2006;45(2):241-55.
  26. Park JK, Cho HJ, Han KG et al. Condition and satisfaction on using the aid rehabilitativetools and level of daily living independence of the physical disabled. The Educational Journal for Physical and Multiple Disabilities. 2007;49:1-24.
  27. Chang MY, Kwon HC, Kim KM, An DH. The study on education and perception of occupational therapists toward assistive technology. The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy. 2007;15(1):107-17.