DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The structural safety assessment of a tie-down system on a tension leg platform during hurricane events

  • Yang, Chan K. (Technip) ;
  • Kim, M.H. (Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University)
  • Received : 2011.11.04
  • Accepted : 2011.12.02
  • Published : 2011.12.25

Abstract

The performance of a rig tie-down system on a TLP (Tension Leg Platform) is investigated for 10-year, 100-year, and 1000-year hurricane environments. The inertia loading on the derrick is obtained from the three-hour time histories of the platform motions and accelerations, and the dynamic wind forces as well as the time-dependent heel-induced gravitational forces are also applied. Then, the connection loads between the derrick and its substructure as well as the substructure and deck are obtained to assess the safety of the tie-down system. Both linear and nonlinear inertia loads on the derrick are included. The resultant external forces are subsequently used to calculate the loads on the tie-down clamps at every time step with the assumption of rigid derrick. The exact dynamic equations including nonlinear terms are used with all the linear and second-order wave forces considering that some dynamic contributions, such as rotational inertia, centripetal forces, and the nonlinear excitations, have not been accounted for in the conventional engineering practices. From the numerical simulations, it is seen that the contributions of the second-order sum-frequency (or springing) accelerations can be appreciable in certain hurricane conditions. Finally, the maximum reaction loads on the clamps are obtained and used to check the possibility of slip, shear, and tensile failure of the tie-down system for any given environment.

Keywords

References

  1. AISC, Manual of steel construction, allowable stress design, 9th Edition.
  2. Andrighetto, P.L., Valdiero, A.C. and Carlotto, L. (2005), "Study of the friction behavior in industrial pneumatic actuators", Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Mechanical Engineering.
  3. API (1995), Specification for drilling and well servicing structures-API Spec. 4F, 2nd Edition.
  4. API (1993), Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms-load and resistance factor design.
  5. Collins and Jack A. (2002), Mechanical design of machine elements and machines, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  6. Garret, D.L. (1982), "Dynamic analysis of slender rods", J. Energy. Resour. Technol., 104(4), 302-307. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3230419
  7. Kim, M.H., Tahar, A. and Kim, Y.B. (2001a), "Variability of TLP motion analysis against various design methodologies/parameters", Proceedings of the 11th ISOPE conference, Stavanger, Norway.
  8. Kim, M.H. and Zhang, Z. (2009), "Transient effects of tendon disconnection on the survivability of a TLP in moderatestrength hurricane conditions", Int. J. Naval Architect. Ocean Eng., 1(1), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.3744/JNAOE.2009.1.1.013
  9. Kim, M.H., Koo, B.J., Mercier, R.M. and Ward, E.G. (2005), "Vessel/mooring/riser coupled dynamic analysis of aturret-moored FPSO compared with OTRC experiment", Ocean Eng., 32(14-15), 1780-1802, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.12.013
  10. Kim, M.H., Ran, Z. and Zheng, W.(2001b), "Hull/mooring coupled dynamic analysis of a truss spar in time domain", Int. J. Offshore Polar, 11(1), 42-54.
  11. Kim, M.H. and Yue, D.K. (1991), "Sum- and difference-frequency wave loads on a body in uni-directional Gaussian seas", J. Ship Res., 35, 127-140.
  12. Kim, M.H. and Yue, D.K.P. (1990), "The complete second-order diffraction solution for an axisymmetric body Part 2. bichromatic incident waves and body motions", J. Fluid Mech., 211, 557-593. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112090001690
  13. Lee, C.H., Newman, J.N., Kim, M.H. and Yue, D.K.P. (1991), "The computation of second-order wave loads". Proceedings of the 10th Offshore Mechanics and Artic Eng. Conference, Stavanger, Norway.
  14. Ran, Z. and Kim, M.H. (1997), "Nonlinear coupled analysis of a tethered spar in waves", Int. J. Offshore Polar, 7(2), 111-118.
  15. Salmon, C.G. and Johnson, J.E. (1995), Steel structures design and behavior, 4th Edition.
  16. Sgouros, G.E., Pritchett, W.M., Schafer, D.R. and Jones, D.L. (2005), "Shell's experience with hurricane ivan", Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference, OTC17733.
  17. Ward, E.G.. and Gebara, J.M. (2006), "Assessment of storm sea fastenings for drilling and workover rigs on floating production systems during hurricane ivan: phase 1", Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 18324.
  18. Ward, E.G., Kim, M.H. and Bae, Y.H. (2010), "Tie-down loads for drilling rigs and modules on floating structures", Proceedings of the OTC (Offshore Technology Conference) #20864, Houston
  19. Yang, C.K. (2009), Numerical modeling of nonlinear coupling between lines/beams with multiple floating bodies, Ph.D. Thesis, Texas A&M University.
  20. Yang, Chan K., Bae, Y.H., Kim, M.H. and Ward, E.G. (2010a), "Loads on tie-down systems for floating drilling rigs during hurricane conditions", J. ISOPE.
  21. Yang, Chan K. and Kim, M.H. (2010b), "Transient effects of tendon disconnection of a TLP by hull-tendon-riser coupled dynamic analysis", Ocean Eng., 37(8-9), 667-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.01.005
  22. Yang, Chan K. and Kim, M.H. (2010c), "Linear and nonlinear approach of hydro-pneumatic tensioner modeling for spar global performance", J. OMAE, 132(1).

Cited by

  1. Dynamic analysis for the global performance of an SPM-feeder-cage system under waves and currents vol.29, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-015-0029-8
  2. Performance changes of a floating offshore wind turbine with broken mooring line vol.101, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.044
  3. Turret location impact on global performance of a thruster-assisted turret-moored FPSO vol.6, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2016.6.3.265
  4. Numerical model of a tensioner system and riser guide vol.3, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2013.3.4.257
  5. Effect of water jetting parameters on the penetration behavior of jack-up spudcan in surficial sand condition vol.5, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2015.5.1.001
  6. Influence of failed blade-pitch-control system to FOWT by aero-elastic-control-floater-mooring coupled dynamic analysis vol.3, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2013.3.4.295
  7. Shape Optimization of a Hole for Water Jetting in a Spudcan for a Jack-up Rig vol.40, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2016.40.4.337
  8. Enhancement of wave-energy-conversion efficiency of a single power buoy with inner dynamic system by intentional mismatching strategy vol.3, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2013.3.3.203
  9. Safety assessment of caisson transport on a floating dock by frequency- and time-domain calculations vol.4, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2014.4.2.099
  10. Numerical simulation of dynamic Interactions of an arctic spar with drifting level ice vol.6, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2016.6.4.345
  11. Coupled dynamic analysis of multiple wind turbines on a large single floater vol.92, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.10.001
  12. Effect of water jetting on soil properties and spud-can penetration/extraction in various soil conditions: numerical simulation vs. physical model test vol.13, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2017.1368123
  13. Effect of plate slope and water jetting on the penetration depth of a jack-up spud-can for surficial sands vol.4, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2014.4.4.263
  14. A study of internal wave influence on OTEC systems vol.3, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2013.3.4.309
  15. Local dynamic buckling of FPSO steel catenary riser by coupled time-domain simulations vol.4, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2014.4.3.215
  16. Dynamic behaviors of conventional SCR and lazy-wave SCR for FPSOs in deepwater vol.106, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.039
  17. Simulation of Multiliquid-Layer Sloshing With Vessel Motion by Using Moving Particle Semi-Implicit Method vol.137, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031103
  18. Fuel-Optimal Thrust-Allocation Algorithm Using Penalty Optimization Programing for Dynamic-Positioning-Controlled Offshore Platforms vol.11, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/en11082128
  19. Tension variations of hydro-pneumatic riser tensioner and implications for dry-tree interface in semisubmersible vol.7, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2017.7.1.021
  20. Spud-can penetration depending on soil properties: Comparison between numerical simulation and physical model test vol.7, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2017.7.2.107
  21. Suppression of tension variations in hydro-pneumatic riser tensioner by using force compensation control vol.7, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2017.7.3.225
  22. Effects of geometric shape of LWSCR (lazy-wave steel catenary riser) on its global performance and structural behavior vol.8, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2018.8.3.247
  23. 탱크 내 격벽에 의한 간극 변화가 선박 운동에 미치는 영향 연구 vol.24, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2018.24.6.796
  24. Effects of nonlinear FK (Froude- Krylov) and hydrostatic restoring forces on arctic-spar motions in waves vol.12, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2020.01.002
  25. AI based control theory for interaction of ocean system vol.10, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2020.10.2.227
  26. The Effect of Reinforcing Plate on the Stiffness of Elastomeric Bearing for FPSO vol.13, pp.24, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13246640
  27. Transient Responses Evaluation of FPSO with Different Failure Scenarios of Mooring Lines vol.9, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9020103
  28. Comparison of the Shear Modulus of an Offshore Elastomeric Bearing between Numerical Simulation and Experiment vol.11, pp.10, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104384