Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of comprehensive earthquake loss scenarios for a Greek and a Turkish city: seismic hazard, geotechnical and lifeline aspects

  • Pitilakis, Kyriazis D. (Aristotle University, Department of Civil Engineering, Research Unit of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics) ;
  • Anastasiadis, Anastasios I. (Aristotle University, Department of Civil Engineering, Research Unit of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics) ;
  • Kakderi, Kalliopi G. (Aristotle University, Department of Civil Engineering, Research Unit of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics) ;
  • Manakou, Maria V. (Aristotle University, Department of Civil Engineering, Research Unit of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics) ;
  • Manou, Dimitra K. (Aristotle University, Department of Civil Engineering, Research Unit of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics) ;
  • Alexoudi, Maria N. (Aristotle University, Department of Civil Engineering, Research Unit of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics) ;
  • Fotopoulou, Stavroula D. (Aristotle University, Department of Civil Engineering, Research Unit of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics) ;
  • Argyroudis, Sotiris A. (Aristotle University, Department of Civil Engineering, Research Unit of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics) ;
  • Senetakis, Kostas G. (Aristotle University, Department of Civil Engineering, Research Unit of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics)
  • Received : 2010.10.29
  • Accepted : 2011.02.17
  • Published : 2011.09.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The development of reliable earthquake mitigation plans and seismic risk management procedures can only be based on the establishment of comprehensive earthquake hazard and loss scenarios. Two cities, Grevena (Greece) and D$\ddot{u}$zce (Turkey), were used as case studies in order to apply a comprehensive methodology for the vulnerability and loss assessment of lifelines. The methodology has the following distinctive phases: detailed inventory, identification of the typology of each component and system, evaluation of the probabilistic seismic hazard, geotechnical zonation, ground response analysis and estimation of the spatial distribution of seismic motion for different seismic scenarios, vulnerability analysis of the exposed elements at risk. Estimating adequate earthquake scenarios for different mean return periods, and selecting appropriate vulnerability functions, expected damages of the water and waste water systems in D$\ddot{u}$zce and of the roadway network and waste water system of Grevena are estimated and discussed; comparisons with observed earthquake damages are also made in the case of D$\ddot{u}$zce, proving the reliability and the efficiency of the proposed methodology. The results of the present study constitute a sound basis for the development of efficient loss scenarios for lifelines and infrastructure facilities in seismic prone areas. The first part of this paper, concerning the estimation of the seismic ground motions, has been utilized in the companion paper by Kappos et al. (2010) in the same journal.

Keywords

References

  1. Aki, K. (1957), "Space and time spectra of stationary stochastic waves, with special reference to microtremors", Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Tokyo Univ., 25, 415-457.
  2. Alexoudi, M. (2005), Contribution to seismic assessment of lifelines in urban areas. Development of a holistic methodology for seismic risk, PhD Thesis, Civil Engineering Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. (in Greek)
  3. Alexoudi, M., Manou, D. and Pitilakis, K. (2008), "Seismic vulnerability analysis of waste-water system. Methodology and application for Düzce and Kocaeli earthquakes", Proceedings of the 14th WCEE, Beijing, October.
  4. Alexoudi, M., Manou, D. and Pitilakis, K. (2010), "The role local soil condition and vulnerability relations in the seismic behavor of water system. Application in Duzce", Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering. (in Greek)
  5. Alsan, E., Tezucan, L. and Bath, M. (1976), "An earthquake catalogue for Turkey for the interval 1913-1970", Tectonophysics, 31, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(76)90159-1
  6. Ambraseys, N.N. (1996), "The prediction of earthquake peak ground acceleration in Europe", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 24, 467-490.
  7. Ambraseys, N.N. and Finkel, C.F. (1987), "Seismicity of Turkey and neighbouring regions, 1899-1915", Ann. Geophysicae, 5, 701-725.
  8. American Lifeline Alliance (ALA) (2002), Development of guidelines to define natural hazards performance objectives for water systems, Vol. I, 138 pp.
  9. American Lifelines Alliance (ALA) (2001a), Seismic fragility formulations for water systems, Part 1 - Guideline, ASCE-FEMA, 104 pp.
  10. American Lifelines Alliance (ALA) (2001b), Seismic fragility formulations for water systems, Part 2 - Appendices, ASCE-FEMA, 239 pp.
  11. Argyroudis, S., Billis, Th., Deri, A. and Pitilakis, K. (2006), "Seismic fragility of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits", Proceedings of 5th National Conference on Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Xanthi, May-June. (in Greek)
  12. Argyroudis, S., Pitilakis, K. and Chatzigogos, Th. (2008), "Seismic risk assessment of thessaloniki's roadway network", Proceedings of 3rd National Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology, Athens, November. (in Greek)
  13. Bardet, J.P., Ichii, K. and Lin, C.H. (2000), EERA, A computer program for equivalent-linear earthquake site response analysis of layered soil deposits, University of Southern California, Department of Civil Engineering.
  14. Barka, A.A. (1992), "The North Anatolian fault zone", Ann. Tectonicae, 6, 164-195.
  15. Brunn, J. (1956), "Contribution a L'Etude Geologique du Pinde Septentrional et Dune Partie de la Macedoine occidentale", Ann Geol. Pays. Hellen., 7, 1-358.
  16. CEN European Committee for Standardization (2004), Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.
  17. Cornell, C.A. (1968), "Engineering seismic risk analysis", B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 58, 1583-1606.
  18. EAK2000 (2000), Greek seismic code, Organization of Seismic Planning and Protection.
  19. Eidinger, J. and Avila, E. (1999), "Guidelines for the seismic upgrade of water transmission facilities", Monograph No. 15, TCLEE/ ASCE.
  20. Erdik, M., Doyuran, V., Gulkan, P. and Akkas, N. (1985), "A probabilistic assessment of the seismic hazard in Turkey", Tectonophysics, 117, 295-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(85)90275-6
  21. Eurocode 8, Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures - Part 1-1: General rules - seismic actions and general requirements for structures, European Pre-standard, ENV 1998-1-1, Oct.1994, CEN-European Committee for Standardization.
  22. FRisk88M (1996), User's manual, ver. 1.70., Risk Engineering Inc., Boulder CO., 69pp, 2 Appendixes.
  23. Idriss, I.M. and Sun, J.I. (1992), User's manual for SHAKE91, A computer Program for Conducting Equivalent Linear Seismic Response Analyses of Horizontally Layered Soil Deposits Program Modified based on the Original SHAKE Program Published in December 1972 by Schnabel, Lysmer and Seed.
  24. Isoyama, R., Ishida, E., Yune, K. and Shirozu T. (1998), "Seismic damage estimation procedure for water supply pipelines", Proceedings, Water & Earthquake '98 Tokyo, IWSA International Workshop, Anti-Seismic Measures on Water Supply, International Water Services Association and Japan Water Works Association, Tokyo, Japan.
  25. Kappos, A.J., Panagopoulos, G., Sextos, A.G., Papanikolaou, V.K. and Stylianidis, K.C. (2010), "Development of comprehensive earthquake loss scenarios for a Greek and a Turkish city - structural aspects", Earthq. Struct. 1(2), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2010.1.2.197
  26. Kayabali, K. and Akin, M. (2002), "Modeling of seismic hazard for Turkey using the recent neotectonic data", Eng. Geology, 63, 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00082-5
  27. Kayabali, K., Ulugergerli, E. and Tokgoz, E. (2001), Geological-geophysical-geotechnical survey report of 246 hectare area in provincial centre of Düzce based on municipal plan, Dep. of Geology and Geophysical Engineering, Faculty of Science, Ankara University, vol.1.
  28. Kudo, K., Kanno, T., Okada, H., Ozel, O., Erdik, M., Sasatani, T., Higashi, S., Takahashi, M. and Yoshida, K. (2002), "Site-specific issues for strong ground motions during the Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake of 17 August 1999, as inferred from array observations of microtremors and aftershocks", B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 92, 448-465. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000812
  29. Manou, D., Alexoudi, M., Raptakis, D. and Pitilakis, K. (2007), "Duzce (M7.2, 1999) earthquake: damage correlation with the microzonation study and vulnerability assessment of the water system in Duzce, Turkey", Proceeding of the 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Thessaloniki, June.
  30. Marmara earthquake rehabilitation project-MERP, Final Scientific Project Report (2006), "An Integrated Intervention for the Rehabilitation of Düzce", Laboratory of Soil Mechanics, Foundations & Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
  31. Mountrakis, D. (1995), Geotectonic evolution of the broader Hellenic region, Geology Department, School of Science, University of Thessaloniki. (in Greek)
  32. Nakamura, Y. (1989), "A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremors on the ground surface", QR Railway Tech. Res. Inst., 30, 25-33.
  33. National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) (2004), Earthquake loss estimation methodology HAZUS 2004, technical manual, FEMA, Washington DC.
  34. Newmark, M.N. (1965), "Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments", Geotechnique, 15, 139-160. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1965.15.2.139
  35. Ordaz, M. (1999), CRISIS99: A computer program to compute seismic hazard, University of Mexico (UNAM).
  36. O'Rourke, M.J. and Ayala, G. (1993), "Pipeline damage due to wave propagation", J. Geotech. Eng. - ASCE, 119, 1490-1498. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:9(1490)
  37. Ozbey, C. (2004), Empirical peak horizontal acceleration relationship for northwestern Turkey, MSc Thesis, Bogazici University, Istanbul.
  38. Paolucci, R. and Pitilakis K. (2007), "Seismic risk assessment of underground structures under transient ground deformations", Pitilakis K. (Ed.), Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Chap. 18, 433-459, Springer.
  39. Papaioannou, Ch.A. and Papazachos, B.C. (2000), "Time-independent and time-dependent seismic hazard in Greece based on seismogenic sources", B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 90, 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1785/0119980023
  40. Papanastassiou, D., Drakatos, G., Voulgaris, N. and Stavrakakis, G. (1998), "The May 13, 1995, Kozani-Grevena (NW) Greece earthquake: source study and its tectonic implications", J. Geodynamics, 26, 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-3707(97)00068-9
  41. Papazachos, B.C., Mountrakis, D.M., Papazachos, C.B., Tranos, M.D., Karakaisis, G.F. and Savvaidis A.S. (2001), "The faults which have caused the known major earthquakes in Greece and surrounding region between the 5th century BC and today", Proc. 2nd Greek conf. Earthq. Eng. & Eng. Seismol., Thessaloniki, November.
  42. Pavlides, S. and Mountrakis, D. (1987), "Extensional tectonics of northwestern Macedonia, Greece, since the late Miocene", J. Struct. Geol., 9, 385-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(87)90115-5
  43. Pavlides, S., Zouros, N.C., Chatzipetros, A.A., Kostopoulos, D.S. and Mountrakis, D.M. (1995), "The 13 May 1995 western Macedonia, Greece (Kozani Grevena) earthquake; preliminary results", Terra Nova, 7, 544-549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3121.1995.tb00556.x
  44. Pitilakis et al. (2009), "SRM-DGC (Development and proposition for implementation of an efficient methodology and appropriate local instruments for the management, prevention and reduction of seismic risk in Düzce -Turkey, Grevena - Greece and Catania - Italy) Final Report, Part A (2009)", Final report for the city of Grevena (WP: 1-5), Laboratory of Soil Mechanics, Foundations & Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
  45. Pitilakis et al. (2009). "SRM-DGC (Development and proposition for implementation of an efficient methodology and appropriate local instruments for the management, prevention and reduction of seismic risk in Duzce - Turkey, Grevena - Greece and Catania - Italy) Final Report, Part B (2009)", Final report for the city of Duzce (WP: 1-5), Laboratory of Soil Mechanics, Foundations & Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
  46. Pitilakis, K., Alexoudi, A., Argyroudis, S., Monge, O. and Martin, C. (2006), "Chapter 9: Vulnerability assessment of lifelines", C.S. Oliveira, A. Roca and X. Goula ed., Assessing and Managing Earthquake Risk. Geo-Scientific and Engineering Knowledge for Earthquake Risk mitigation: Developments, Tools and Techniques, Springer Publ.
  47. Pitilakis, K., Alexoudi, M., Kakderi, K., Manou, D., Batum, E. and Raptakis, D. (2005), "Vulnerability analysis of water systems in strong earthquakes. The case of Lefkas (Greece) and Duzce (Turkey)", Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Geodynamics of Eastern Mediterranean: Active Tectonics of the Aegean, Istanbul, June.
  48. Pitilakis, K., Anastasiadis, A., Manakou, M., Apostolidis, P., Messini, A., Senetakis, K. and Fotopoulou, S. (2008), "Theoretical and empirical site response studies in the city of Grevena", Proceedings of 3rd National Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology, Athens, November. (in Greek)
  49. Pitilakis, K., Makra, K. and Raptakis, D. (2001), "2D vs 1D site effects with potential applications to seismic norms: the cases of EURO-SEISTEST and Thessaloniki", Invited lecture in XVth International Conference on Soil Mechanics & Geotechnical Engineering, 123-133, Istanbul - Turkey.
  50. Pitilakis, K., Raptakis, D., Makra, K., Manakou, M. and Chavez-Garcia, F.J. (2010), "EUROSEISTEST 3D array for the study of complex site effects", Akkar, D. Sinan; Gulkan, Polat; Eck, Torild van (Eds.), Earthquake Data in Engineering Seismology, Predictive Models, Data Management and Networks. Series: Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 14.
  51. Rosenblad, B.L., Rathje, E.M. and Stokoe, K.H. (2001), Shear wave velocity profiling by SASW method at selected strong-motion stations from the 1999 Turkey earthquakes, Final Report to Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, September.
  52. Sadigh, K., Chang, C.Y., Egan, J.A., Makdisi, F. and Youngs, R.R. (1997), "Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data", Seism. Res. Lett., 68, 180-189. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.1.180
  53. Sahin, M. and Tari, E. (2000), "The August 17 Kocaeli and the November 12 Düzce earthquakes in Turkey", Earth Planets Space, 52, 753-757. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352277
  54. Schnabel, P.B., Lysmer, J. and Seed, H.B. (1972). "SHAKE: a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites", Report No. EERC72-12, University of California, Berkeley.
  55. Simsek, O. and Dalgic, S. (1997), "Consolidation properties of the clays at Düzce plain and their relationship with geological evolution", Geol. Bull. Turkey, 40, 29-38.
  56. SRM-DGC (2006-2008), Development and proposition for implementation of an efficient methodology and appropriate local instruments for the management, prevention and reduction of seismic risk in Duzce -Turkey, Grevena - Greece and Catania - Italy, Research project, Interreg III B Archimed, Code Number. A.1.010.
  57. Tadday, K. and Sahin, M., (2001), "Situation analysis and recommendations related to improvement measures for drinking water supply system in Duzce", Proceedings of the Symposium on Water Supply Situation in Earthquake Affected Region, Duzce, April.
  58. Theodulidis, N. and Papazachos, B. (1992), "Dependence of strong ground motion on magnitude-distance, site geology and macroseismic intensity for shallow earthquakes in Greece: I, Peak horizontal acceleration, velocity and displacement", Soil Dyn. Earth. Eng., 11, 387-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-7261(92)90003-V
  59. Tromans, J. (2004), Behaviour of buried water supply pipelines in earthquake zones, PhD Thesis, Imperial College of Science, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of London.
  60. Ural, O. (1999), "What Went Wrong?", ITU-IAHS International Conference on the Kocaeli Earthquake, Scientific Assessments and Recommendations for Re-building, Istanbul, December.
  61. Yaltirak, C., Alpar, B. and Yuce, H. (1998), "Tectonic elements controlling the evolution of the Gulf of Saros (Northeastern Aegean Sea, Turkey)", Tectonophysics, 300, 227-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(98)00242-X
  62. Yamanaka, H., Kato, M., Hashimoto, M., Gulerce, U., Iyisan, R. and Ansal, A.M. (2002), Assessment of seismic local-site effects at plural test sites, Final Report to the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Research Grant No.11694134.

Cited by

  1. Assessment of socioeconomic vulnerability to landslides using an indicator-based approach: methodology and case studies vol.73, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0571-2
  2. New fuzzy method in choosing Ground Motion Prediction Equation (GMPE) in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis vol.10, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.2.389
  3. Influence of some relevant parameters in the seismic vulnerability of RC bridges vol.3, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.3_4.365
  4. Some properties of the Green's function of simplified elastodynamic problems vol.3, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.3_4.507
  5. Evaluation of damage probability matrices from observational seismic damage data vol.4, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.3.299
  6. Seismic probabilistic risk assessment of weir structures considering the earthquake hazard in the Korean Peninsula vol.13, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.4.421
  7. Comparison of VS30 using measured, assigned and proxy values in three cities of Northern Greece vol.239, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.003
  8. Seismic Hazard Assessment of Shigo Kas Hydro-Power Project (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan) vol.11, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11080349
  9. Extreme scenarios selection for seismic assessment of expanded lifeline networks vol.17, pp.10, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1811989
  10. Empirical seismic vulnerability analysis of infrastructure systems in Nepal vol.19, pp.14, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01219-5