The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of bone quality and implant surgical technique on implant stability quotient (ISQ) value

  • Yoon, Hong-Gi (Department of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Heo, Seong-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Koak, Jai-Young (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Kyun (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Su-Young (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2011.01.14
  • Accepted : 2011.02.17
  • Published : 2011.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study investigated the influence of bone quality and surgical technique on the implant stability quotient (ISQ) value. In addition, the influence of interfacial bone quality, directly surrounding the implant fixture, on the resonance frequency of the structure was also evaluated by the finite element analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two different types of bone (type 1 and type 2) were extracted and trimmed from pig rib bone. In each type of bone, the same implants were installed in three different ways: (1) Compaction, (2) Self-tapping, and (3) Tapping. The ISQ value was measured and analyzed to evaluate the influence of bone quality and surgical technique on the implant primary stability. For finite element analysis, a three dimensional implant fixture-bone structure was designed and the fundamental resonance frequency of the structure was measured with three different density of interfacial bone surrounding the implant fixture. RESULTS. In each group, the ISQ values were higher in type 1 bone than those in type 2 bone. Among three different insertion methods, the Tapping group showed the lowest ISQ value in both type 1 and type 2 bones. In both bone types, the Compaction groups showed slightly higher mean ISQ values than the Self-tapping groups, but the differences were not statistically significant. Increased interfacial bone density raised the resonance frequency value in the finite element analysis. CONCLUSION. Both bone quality and surgical technique have influence on the implant primary stability, and resonance frequency has a positive relation with the density of implant fixture-surrounding bone.

Keywords

References

  1. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501.
  2. Lioubavina-Hack N, Lang NP, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:244-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01201.x
  3. Sennerby L, Roos J. Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:408-20.
  4. Su YY, Wilmes B, Ho¨nscheid R, Drescher D. Application of a wireless resonance frequency transducer to assess primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants: an in vitro study in pig ilia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:647-54.
  5. Rodrigo D, Aracil L, Martin C, Sanz M. Diagnosis of implant stability and its impact on implant survival: a prospective case series study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:255-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01820.x
  6. Zix J, Hug S, Kessler-Liechti G, Mericske-Stern R. Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment: comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:525-30.
  7. Sim CP, Lang NP. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:598-604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01878.x
  8. Sul YT, Jo¨nsson J, Yoon GS, Johansson C. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesiumincorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1146-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01767.x
  9. Bilbao A, Oliveira MH, Varela-Centelles PI, Seoane J. Assessment of dental implant stability in osseodistraction-generated bone: a resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:772-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01614.x
  10. Abrahamsson I, Linder E, Lang NP. Implant stability in relation to osseointegration: an experimental study in the Labrador dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:313-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01646.x
  11. Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. An examination of immediately loaded dental implant stability in the diabetic patient using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Quintessence Int 2007;38:271-9.
  12. Deng B, Tan KB, Liu GR, Lu Y. Influence of osseointegration degree and pattern on resonance frequency in the assessment of dental implant stability using finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:1082-8.
  13. Chun HJ, Cheong SY, Han JH, Heo SJ, Chung JP, Rhyu IC, Choi YC, Baik HK, Ku Y, Kim MH. Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:565-74. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00891.x
  14. Lang LA, Kang B, Wang RF, Lang BR. Finite element analysis to determine implant preload. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:539-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.09.012
  15. Huang HM, Lee SY, Yeh CY, Lin CT. Resonance frequency assessment of dental implant stability with various bone qualities: a numerical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:65-74.
  16. Carter DR, Hayes WC. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977;59:954- 62. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197759070-00021
  17. Dechow PC, Nail GA, Schwartz-Dabney CL, Ashman RB. Elastic properties of human supraorbital and mandibular bone. Am J Phys Anthropol 1993;90:291-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330900304
  18. Schwartz-Dabney CL, Dechow PC. Accuracy of elastic property measurement in mandibular cortical bone is improved by using cylindrical specimens. J Biomech Eng 2002;124:714-23. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1517567
  19. Roze J, Babu S, Saffarzadeh A, Gayet-Delacroix M, Hoornaert A, Layrolle P. Correlating implant stability to bone structure. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1140-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01745.x
  20. Piao CM, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK, Han CH, Fang XH. Effect of implant designs on insertion torque and implant stability quotient (ISQ) value. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2006;44:325-32.
  21. Kim SK, Lee HN, Choi YC, Heo SJ, Lee CW, Choie MK. Effects of anodized oxidation or turned implants on bone healing after using conventional drilling or trabecular compaction technique: histomorphometric analysis and RFA. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:644-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01285.x
  22. Cehreli MC, Ko¨kat AM, Comert A, Akkocaoğlu M, Tekdemir I, Akça K. Implant stability and bone density: assessment of correlation in fresh cadavers using conventional and osteotome implant sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1163-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01758.x

Cited by

  1. Estimating the density of femoral head trabecular bone from hip fracture patients using computed tomography scan data vol.228, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411914540285
  2. Clinical efficacy of immediate implant loading protocols compared to conventional loading depending on the type of the restoration: a systematic review vol.26, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12428
  3. Successful bone-anchored hearing aid implantation in a patient with osteogenesis imperfecta vol.129, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215115002510
  4. Computer-Guided Implant Surgery in Fresh Extraction Sockets and Immediate Loading of a Full Arch Restoration: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study of 14 Consecutively Treated Patients vol.2015, pp.1687-8736, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/824127
  5. Impact of Bone Quality and Implant Type on the Primary Stability: An Experimental Study Using Bovine Bone vol.41, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00156
  6. Histomorphometric Comparison of 3 Osteotomy Techniques vol.27, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000767
  7. The effect of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implants with different surface treatments: A study in sheep pp.15524973, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34154
  8. Resonance Frequency Analysis of Tapered Implants Placed at Maxillary Posterior Sites After Lateral Sinus Augmentation vol.28, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000858
  9. An Ex Vivo Model in Human Femoral Heads for Histopathological Study and Resonance Frequency Analysis of Dental Implant Primary Stability vol.2014, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/535929
  10. Influence of Thread Pitch, Helix Angle, and Compactness on Micromotion of Immediately Loaded Implants in Three Types of Bone Quality: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis vol.2014, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/983103
  11. Dental implants: An overview vol.44, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2017.44.7.596
  12. Hearing impairment and osteogenesis imperfecta: Literature review vol.136, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2019.05.004
  13. Does the Drilling Technique for Implant Site Preparation Enhance Implant Success in Low-Density Bone? A Systematic Review vol.28, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000917
  14. Does the manual insertion torque of smartpegs affect the outcome of implant stability quotients (ISQ) during resonance frequency analysis (RFA)? vol.5, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-019-0195-1
  15. A clinico-radiographic and histomorphometric analysis of alveolar ridge preservation using calcium phosphosilicate, PRF, and collagen plug vol.41, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-019-0215-3
  16. Biomechanical Analysis of Grafted and Nongrafted Maxillary Sinus Augmentation in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla with Three-Dimensional Finite Element Method vol.2020, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8419319
  17. Morphological Evaluation of Bone by CT to Determine Primary Stability—Clinical Study vol.13, pp.11, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112605
  18. Factors Influencing Primary and Secondary Implant Stability-A Retrospective Cohort Study with 582 Implants in 272 Patients vol.10, pp.22, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228084
  19. The Effectiveness of Osseodensification Drilling Protocol for Implant Site Osteotomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis vol.14, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14051147
  20. Experimental & FEM Analysis of Orthodontic Mini-Implant Design on Primary Stability vol.11, pp.12, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125461
  21. Comparison of Implant Stability between Regenerated and Non-Regenerated Bone. A Prospective Cohort Study vol.10, pp.15, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153220