Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation (한국방재학회 논문집)

Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation (한국방재학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Probabilistic Analysis of Independent Storm Events: 1. Construction of Annual Maximum Storm Event Series

독립호우사상의 확률론적 해석: 1. 연최대 호우사상 계열의 작성

  • Received : 2011.02.09
  • Accepted : 2011.03.04
  • Published : 2011.04.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, annual maximum storm events are proposed to determined by the return periods considering total rainfall and rainfall intensity together. The rainfall series at Seoul since 1961 are examined and the results are as follows. First, the bivariate exponential distribution is used to determine annual maximum storm events. The parameter estimated annually provides more suitable results than the parameter estimated by whole periods. The chosen annual maximum storm events show these properties. The events with the biggest total rainfall tend to be selected in the wet years and the events with the biggest rainfall intensity in the wet years. These results satisfy the concept of critical storm events which produces the most severe runoff according to soil wetness. The average characteristics of the annual maximum storm events said average rainfall intensity 32.7 mm/hr in 1 hr storm duration(total rainfall 32.7 mm), average rainfall intensity 9.7 mm/hr in 24 hr storm duration(total rainfall 231.6 mm) and average rainfall intensity 7.4 mm/hr in 48 hr storm duration(total rainfall 355.0 mm).

본 연구에서는 연최대치 호우사상을 결정하기 위해 총강우량과 강우강도를 함께 고려하여 계산한 재현기간을 기준으로 판단하는 방안을 제안하였다. 이러한 방법론은 서울 지점의 1961년 이후 관측된 자료를 대상으로 수행되었으며, 그 결과를 정리하면 다음과 같다. 먼저, 연최대 호우사상의 결정을 위해 이변량 지수분포를 적용하였다. 이변량 지수분포의 적용을 위한 모수추정은 전기간에 대해 수행하는 것보다는 연도별로 추정하는 것이 보다 합리적인 것으로 판단하였다. 선정된 호우사상들의 특성을 살펴보면, 먼저, 강수량이 많은 다우해에는 총강수량이 제일 많은 호우사상이 연최대 호우사상으로 선정되는 경향을 보인다. 강수량이 적은 과우해에는 상대적으로 강우강도가 큰 호우사상이 선정되는 경향이 있다. 이 두 특성은 각각 토양이 습윤한 경우와 건조한 경우 유출의 규모가 큰 호우사상을 선정할 가능성을 크게 해 주는 것이므로, 수문학적 최대호우의 개념도 어느 정도 만족시킨다고 할 수 있다. 선정된 연최대 호우사상의 평균적인 형태는, 강우지속기간이 1시간인 경우에는 강우강도 32.7 mm/hr(총강우량 32.7 mm), 지속기간 24시간인 경우에는 강우강도 9.7 mm/hr(총강우량 231.6 mm), 그리고 지속기간 48시간인 경우에는 강우강도 7.4 mm/hr(총강우량 355.0 mm) 등이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 기상청 (2004) 근대기상 100년사.
  2. 김남원 (2000) 지역별 설계강우의 시간적 분포, 대한토목학회 2000년도 학술발표회 논문집(III), pp. 51-54.
  3. 김대하, 유철상, 김현준 (2007) 조선왕조실록 및 측우기 기록에 나타난 주요호우사상의 평가 : 2. 정량적 평가, 한국수자원학회논문집, 제40권, 제7호, pp. 545-554.
  4. 권영문, 김태웅 (2009) 이변량 강우 빈도해석을 이용한 서울지역 I-D-F 곡선 유도, 대한토목학회논문집, 제29권, 제2B호, pp. 155-162.
  5. 권재호, 박무종, 김중훈 (2004) 비점오염원 산정을 위한 강우 분석, 한국수자원학회 04 학술발표회논문집, pp. 666-670.
  6. 박상덕 (1995) 매년최대 연속 강우량에 따른 강우사상 계열의 확률분포에 관한 연구, 한국수자원학회논문집, 제28권, 제2호, pp. 145-154.
  7. 이동률, 정상만 (1992) 한강유역 강우의 시공간적 특성, 한국수자원학회논문집, 제25권, 제4호, pp. 75-85.
  8. 전종갑, 문병권 (1997) 측우기 강우량 자료의 복원과 분석, 한국기상학회지, 제33권, 제4호, pp. 691-707.
  9. 정종호, 윤용남 (2007). 수자원설계실무, 구미서관.
  10. Adams, B.J. and Papa, F. (2000) Urban Stormwater Management Planning with Analytical Probabilistic Models, John Wiley & Sons, INC., pp. 55-68.
  11. Akan, A.O. and Houghtalen, R.J. (2003) Urban Hydrology, Hydraulics, and Stormwater Quality - Engineering Applications and Computer Modeling, John Wiley & Sons, INC., pp. 246-249.
  12. Arnold, B.C. and Strauss, D. (1988) Bivariate distributions with exponential conditionals, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 83, pp. 522-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478627
  13. Bacchi, B., Becciu, G., and Kottegoga, N.T. (1994) Bivariate exponential model applied to intensities and durations of extreme rainfall, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 155, pp. 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90166-X
  14. Box, G.E.P. and Cox, D. (1964) An analysis of transformation (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Vol. 26, pp. 211-246.
  15. Coles, S. and Tawn, J.A. (1991) Modelling extreme multivariate events, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Vol. 53(2), pp. 377-392.
  16. Cordova, J.R. and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (1985) On probabilistic structure of storm surface runoff, Water Resources Research, Vol. 21(5), pp. 755-763. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR021i005p00755
  17. Freund, J. (1961) A bivariate extension of the exponential distribution, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 56, pp. 971-977. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1961.10482138
  18. Goel, N.K., Seth, S.M., and Chandra, S. (1998) Multivariate modeling of flood flows, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 124(2), pp. 146-155. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:2(146)
  19. Goel, N.K., Kurothe, R.S., Mathur, B.S., and Vogel, R.M. (2000) A derived flood frequency distribution for correlated rainfall intensity and duration, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 228, pp. 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00145-1
  20. Grimaldi, S. and Serinaldi, F. (2006) Asymmetric copula in multivariate flood frequency analysis, Advances in Water Resources, Vol. 29, pp. 1155-1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.09.005
  21. Gumbel, E.J. (1958) Statistics of Extremes. Columbia University Press, pp. 156-305.
  22. Gumbel, E.J. (1960) Bivariate exponential distributions, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 55, pp. 698-707. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1960.10483368
  23. Haan, C.T. (2002) Statistical Methods in Hydrology, 2nd ed. Iowa State Press, pp. 165-167.
  24. Hayakawa, Y. (1994) The construction of new bivariate exponential distributions from a Bayesian perspective, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 89, pp. 1044-1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476840
  25. Kotz, S., Balakrishnan, N., and Johnson. N.L. (2000) Continuous Multivariate Distributions Volume 1: Models and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, INC., pp. 350-362.
  26. Kurothe, R. S., Goel, N.K., and Mathur, B.S., (1997) Derived flood frequency distribution of negatively correlated rainfall intensity and duration, Water Resources Research, Vol. 33(9), pp. 2103-2107. https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR00812
  27. Michele, C.D., Salvadori, G., Canossi, M., Petaccia, A., and Rosso, R. (2005) Bivariate Statistical Approach to Check Adequacy of Dam Spillway, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:1(50)
  28. Pilgrim, D.H. (1987) Australian Rainfall and Runoff - A Guide to Flood Estimation Volume 1. revised edition, The Institute of Engineers, Australia, pp. 160-161.
  29. Tawn, J.A. (1988) Bivariate extreme value theory: models and estimation, Biometrica, Vol. 75(3), pp. 397-415. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.3.397
  30. Tawn, J.A. (1990) Modelling multivariate extreme value distribution, Biometrica, Vol. 77(2), pp. 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/77.2.245
  31. Yue, S. (2000) Joint probability distribution of annual maximum storm peaks and amounts as represented by daily rainfalls, Hydrological Sciences Journal, Vol. 45(2), pp. 315-326 https://doi.org/10.1080/02626660009492327
  32. Yue, S. (2001a) The Gumbel logistic model for representing a multivariate storm event, Advances in Water Resources, Vol. 24(2), pp. 179-185.
  33. Yue, S. (2001b) A bivariate gamma distribution for use in multivariate flood frequency analysis, Hydrological Processes, Vol. 15(6), pp. 1033-1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.259
  34. Yue, S., Ouarda T.B.M.J., Bobe, B., Gegendre, P., and Bruneau, P. (1999) The Gumbel mixed model, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 226(1-2), pp. 88-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00168-7
  35. Yue, S. and Rasmussen, P. (2002) Bivariate frequency analysis: discussion of some useful concepts in hydrological application, Hydrological Processes, Vol. 16, pp. 2881-2898. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1185
  36. Yue, S. and Wang, C.Y. (2004) A comparison of two bivariate extreme value distribution, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, Vol. 18(2), pp. 61-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-003-0124-x
  37. Zhang, L. and Singh, V.P. (2007) Bivariate rainfall frequency distributions using Archimedean copulas, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 332(1-2), pp. 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.033