Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Supplementation of Bacillus subtilis LS 1-2 Grown on Citrus-juice Waste and Corn-soybean Meal Substrate on Growth Performance, Nutrient Retention, Caecal Microbiology and Small Intestinal Morphology of Broilers

  • Sen, Sinol (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Ingale, S.L. (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, J.S. (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, K.H. (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Y.W. (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Khong, Chou (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lohakare, J.D. (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, E.K. (Department of Biological Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Kim, H.S. (Sinaebio) ;
  • Kwon, I.K. (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Chae, B.J. (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2010.12.08
  • Accepted : 2011.02.18
  • Published : 2011.08.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A feeding trial was conducted to investigate the effect of dietary supplementation of Bacillus subtilis LS 1-2 grown on citrus-juice waste and corn-soybean substrate on growth performance, nutrient retention, caecal microbial population and intestinal morphology in broilers. Three hundred twenty d-old Ross chicks were randomly allotted to 4 treatments on the basis of BW in a randomized complete block design. Each treatment had 4 replicates of 20 chicks in each. Experimental diets were fed in 2 phases, starter (d 0 to 21) and finisher (d 21 to 35). Dietary treatments were; negative control (NC: basal diet without any antimicrobial), positive control (PC: basal diet added with 20 mg/kg Avilamycin), basal diet added with 0.30% Bacillus subtilis LS 1-2 grown on corn-soybean substrate (P1), and basal diet added with 0.30% Bacillus subtilis LS 1-2 grown on citrus-juice waste substrate (P2). Overall BW gain, feed intake and FCR were better (p<0.05) in PC, P1 and P2 treatments as compared to NC. Moreover, overall BW gain and FCR in PC and P2 treatments were greater than P1. Retention of CP, GE (d 21, d 35) and DM (d 35) were increased (p<0.05) in treatments PC, P1 and P2 compared with NC. At d 35, caecal Clostridium and Coliform counts were lower (p<0.05) in treatments PC, P1 and P2 than NC. Moreover, Clostridium and Coliform counts in treatment PC was lower (p<0.05) than P1. Villus height and villus height to crypt depth ratio in both duodenum and ileum were increased (p<0.05) in treatments PC, P1, P2 as compared to NC. However, retention of nutrients, caecal microbial population and intestinal morphology remained comparable among treatments P1 and P2. It is concluded that Bacillus subtilis LS 1-2 inclusion at 0.30% level had beneficial effects on broilers' growth performance, nutrient retention, caecal microflora and intestinal morphology. Additionally, citrus-juice waste can be used as substrate for growth of probiotic Bacillus subtilis LS 1-2.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, T. T., M. A. Eiteman and B. M. Hanel. 2002. Solid state fermentation of broiler litter for production of biocontrol agents. Bioresour. Technol. 82:33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00153-5
  2. AOAC International. 1995. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 16th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD. as probiotics. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 29:813-835.
  3. Awad, W. A., K. Ghareeb and J. Böhm. 2010. Effect of addition of a probiotic microorganism to broiler diets on intestinal mucosal architecture and electrophysiological parameters. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 94:486-494.
  4. Awad, W. A., K. Ghareeb, S. Abdel-Raheem and J. Bohm. 2009. Effect of dietary inclusion of probiotic and symbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 88:49-55. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00244
  5. Barton, M. D. 2000. Antibiotic use in animal feed and its impact on human health. Nutr. Res. Rev. 13:279-299. https://doi.org/10.1079/095442200108729106
  6. Cavazzoni, V., A. Adami and C. Cstrivilli. 1998. Performance of broiler chickens supplemented with Bacillus coagulans as probiotic. Br. Poult. Sci. 39:526-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669888719
  7. Chen, K.-L., W.-L. Kho, S.-H. You, R.-H. Yeh, S.-W. Tang and C.- W. Hsieh. 2009. Effects of Bacillus subtilis var. natto and Saccharomyces cerevisiae mixed fermented feed on the enhanced growth performance of broilers. Poult. Sci. 88:309- 315. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00224
  8. Choi, J. Y., P. L. Shinde, I. K. Kwon, Y. H. Song and B. J. Chae. 2009. Effect of wood vinegar on the performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal microflora in weanling pigs. Asian- Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 22:267-274. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80355
  9. Contreras Esquivel, J. C., R. A. Hours, C. E. Voget and C. F. Mignone. 1999. Aspergillus kawachii produces an acidic pectin releasing enzyme activity. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 88:48-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(99)80174-1
  10. Denev, S. A. 2006. Effect of different growth promoters on the cecal microflora and performance of broiler chickens. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 12:461-474.
  11. El-bendary, M. A. 2006. Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus sphaericus biopesticides production. J. Basic Microbiol. 46:158-170. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.200510585
  12. Fan, Y., J. Croom, V. Christensen, B. Black, A. Bird, L. Daniel, B. McBride and E. Eisen. 1997. Jejunal glucose uptake and oxygen consumption in turkey poults selected for rapid growth. Poult. Sci. 76:1738-1745. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.12.1738
  13. Farnell, M. B., A. M. Donoghue, F. S. De Los Santos, P. J. Blore, B. M. Hargis, G. Tellez and D. J. Donoghue. 2006. Upregulation of oxidative burst and degranulation in chicken heterophils stimulated with probiotic bacteria. Poult. Sci. 85:1900-1906. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.11.1900
  14. Fenton, T. W. and M. Fenton. 1979. An improved method for chromic oxide determination in feed and feces. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 59:631-634. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas79-081
  15. Fritts, C. A., J. H. Kersey, M. A. Moti, E. C. Kroger, F. Yan, J. Si, Q. Jiang, M. M. Campos, A. L. Waldroup and P. W. Waldroup. 2000. Bacillus subtilis C-3102 (Calsporin) improves live performance and microbiological status of broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 9:149-155. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/9.2.149
  16. Fuller, R. 1989. Probiotics in man and animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 66:365-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb05105.x
  17. Higgins, S. E., J. P. Higgins, A. D. Wolfenden, S. N. Henderson, A. Torres-Rodriguez, G. Tellez and B. Hargis. 2008. Evaluation of a Lactobacillus-based probiotic culture for the reduction of Salmonella enteritidis in neonatal broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 87:27-31. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00210
  18. Hong, H. A., H. Duc le and S. M. Cutting. 2005. The use of bacterial spore formers as probiotics. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 29:813-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.001
  19. Jin, L. Z., H.W. Ho, N. Abdullah and S. Jalaludin. 1997. Probiotics in poultry: Modes of action. World Poult. Sci. J. 53:352-368.
  20. Jin, L. Z., H. W. Ho, N. Abdullah and S. Jalaludin. 2000. Digestive and bacteria enzyme activities in broilers fed diets supplemented with Lactobacillus cultures. Poult. Sci. 79:886- 891. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.6.886
  21. Kabir, S. M. L., M. M. Rahman, M. B. Rahman and S. U. Ahmed. 2004. The dynamics of probiotics on growth performance and immune response in broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 3:361-364. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.361.364
  22. Khakesfidi, A. and T. Ghoorchi. 2006. Effect of probiotic on performance and immunocompetence of broiler chicken. J. Poult. Sci. 43:296-300. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.43.296
  23. Li, L. L., Z. P. Hou, T. J. Li, G. Y. Wu, R. L. Huang, Z. R. Tang, C. B. Yang, J. Gong, H. Yu and X. F. Kong. 2008. Effects of dietary probiotic supplementation on ileal digestibility of nutrients and growth performance in 1- to 42-day-old broilers. J. Sci. Food Agric. 88:35-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2910
  24. Line, E. J., S. J. Bailey, N. A. Cox, N. J. Stern and T. Tompkins. 1998. Effect of yeast-supplemented feed on Salmonella and Campylobacter populations in broilers. Poult. Sci.77:405-410. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.3.405
  25. Marin, F. R., C. Soler-Rivas, O. Benavente-Garcia, J. Castillo and J. A. Perez-Alvarez. 2007. By-products from different citrus processes as a source of customized functional fibers. Food Chem. 100:736-741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.04.040
  26. Matsumoto, T., Y. Sugiura, A. Kondo and H. Fukuda. 2000. Efficient production of protopectinases by Bacillus subtilis using medium based on soybean flour. Biochem. Eng. J. 6:81-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-703X(00)00079-6
  27. Miles, R. D., G. D. Butcher, P. R. Henry and R. C. Littell. 2006. Effect of antibiotic growth promoters on broiler performance, intestinal growth parameters, and quantitative morphology. Poult. Sci. 85:476-485. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.3.476
  28. Mountzouris, K. C., P. Tsistsikos, E. Kalamara, S. Nitsh, G. Schatzmayr and K. Fegeros. 2007. Evaluation of the efficacy of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus strains in promoting broiler performance and modulating caecal microflora composition and metabolic activities. Poult. Sci. 86:309-317. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.2.309
  29. Mountzouris, K. C., P. Tsirtsikos, I. Palamidi, A. Arvaniti, M. Mohnl, G. Schatzmayr and K. Fegeros. 2010. Effects of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglobulins, and caecal microflora composition. Poult. Sci. 89:58-67. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00308
  30. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient requirement of poultry. 9th Edn. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  31. Ohh, S. H., P. L. Shinde, Z. Jin, J. Y. Choi, T.-W. Hahn, H. T. Lim, G. Y. Kim, Y. Park, K.-S. Hahm and B. J. Chae. 2009. Potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Gogu valley) protein as an antimicrobial agent in the diets of broilers. Poult. Sci. 88:1227- 1234. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00491
  32. Opanlinski, M., A. Maiorka, F. Dahlke, F. Cunha, F. S. C. Vargas and E. Cardozo. 2007. On the use of probiotic (Bacillus subtilis- strain DSM 17299) as growth promoter in broiler diets. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 9:99-103. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijps.2007.9.2.99
  33. Pascual, M., M. Hugas, J. I. Badiola, J. M. Monfort and M. Garriga. 1999. Lactobacillus salivarius CTC2197 prevents Salmonella enteriditis colonization in chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:4981-4986.
  34. Patterson, J. A. and K. M. Burkholder. 2003. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poult. Sci. 82: 627-631. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.4.627
  35. Samanya, M. and K. Yamauchi. 2002. Histological alterations of intestinal villi in chickens fed dried Bacillus subtilis var. natto. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 133:95-104.
  36. Sanders, M. E. and J. H. Veld. 1999. Bringing a probiotic containing functional food to the market: microbiological, product, regulatory and labeling issues. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 76:93-315.
  37. SAS. 1996. SAS/STAT. User's Guide: Statistics (Release 6.12 Ed.). SAS Inst. Inc., Cary. NC.
  38. Shim, Y. H., P. L. Shinde, J. Y. Choi, J. S. Kim, D. K. Seo, J. I. Pak, B. J. Chae and I. K. Kwon. 2010. Evaluation of multimicrobial probiotics produced by submerged liquid and solid substrate fermentation methods in broilers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 23:521-529. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2010.90446
  39. Teo, A. Y. and H. M. Tan. 2007. Evaluation of the performance and intestinal gut microflora of broilers fed on corn-soy diets supplemented with Bacillus subtilis PB6 (CloSTAT). J. Appl. Poult. Res. 16:296-303. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/16.3.296
  40. Timmermana, H. M., C. J. M. Koningb, L. Mulderc, F. M. Romboutsd and A. C. Beynen. 2004. Monostrain, multistrain and multispecies probiotics: A comparison of functionality and efficacy. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 96:219-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.05.012
  41. Tortuero, F. and E. Fernandez. 1995. Effects of inclusion of microbial cultures in barley based diets fed to laying hens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 53:255-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)00747-W
  42. Vicente, J. L., A. Torres-Rodriguez, S. E. Higgins, C. Pixley, G. Tellez, A. M. Donoghue and B. M. Hargis. 2008. Effect of a selected Lactobacillus spp.-based probiotic on Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis-infected broiler chicks. Avian Dis. 52:143-146. https://doi.org/10.1637/7847-011107-ResNote
  43. Wellenreiter, R. H., D. H. Mowrey, L. A. Stobbs and A. D'assonville. 2000. Effects of avilamycin on performance of broiler chickens. Vet. Therapeut. 1(2):118-124.
  44. Wilkins, M. R., W. W. Widmer, K. Grohmann and R. G. Cameron. 2007. Hydrolysis of grapefruit peel waste with cellulase and pectinase enzymes. Bioresour. Technol. 98:1596-1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.06.022
  45. Xu, Z. R., C. H. Hu, M. S. Xia, X. A. Zhan and M. Q. Wang. 2003. Effects of dietary fructooligosaccharide on digestive enzyme activities, intestinal microflora and morphology of male broilers. Poult. Sci. 82:1030-1036. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.6.1030

Cited by

  1. Effects of dietary inclusion of fermented cottonseed meal on growth, cecal microbial population, small intestinal morphology, and digestive enzyme activity of broilers vol.45, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0322-y
  2. Effects of <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> KN-42 on Growth Performance, Diarrhea and Faecal Bacterial Flora of Weaned Piglets vol.27, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13737
  3. by-products fermented with multistrain probiotics on growth performance, immunity, caecal microbiology and meat oxidative stability in broilers vol.55, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2014.938021
  4. Caecal microbiota of chickens fed diets containing propolis vol.101, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12570
  5. supplementation on the growth performance, blood profile, nutrient retention, and caecal microflora in broiler chickens vol.46, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1411267
  6. Gut barrier function: Effects of (antibiotic) growth promoters on key barrier components and associations with growth performance vol.97, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey021
  7. Effects of citrus pulp, fish by-product and Bacillus subtilis fermentation biomass on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and fecal microflora of weanling pigs vol.56, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1186/2055-0391-56-10
  8. Effects of fermentedcorni fructusand fermented kelp on growth performance, meat quality, and emission of ammonia and hydrogen sulphide from broiler chicken droppings vol.55, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2014.960804
  9. Performance, Caecum Bacterial Count and Ileum Histology of Broilers Fed Different Direct-Fed Microbials vol.8, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2014.106.114