A Review on The Comparative Study on Temperament And Character Inventory (TCI) And Constitutional-psychological Questionnaire

Temperament and Character Inventory(TCI)와 심리(心理)관련설문지의 비교연구에 대한 고찰(考察)

  • Kang, Dong-Woo (Dept. of Human Informatics of Oriental Medicine, Interdisciplinary Programs, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Oh, Hwan-Sup (Dept. of Human Informatics of Oriental Medicine, Interdisciplinary Programs, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Young-Jae (Dept. of Human Informatics of Oriental Medicine, Interdisciplinary Programs, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Young-Bae (Dept. of Human Informatics of Oriental Medicine, Interdisciplinary Programs, Kyung Hee University)
  • 강동우 (경희대학교 학과간협동과정 한방인체정보의학과) ;
  • 오환섭 (경희대학교 학과간협동과정 한방인체정보의학과) ;
  • 박영재 (경희대학교 학과간협동과정 한방인체정보의학과) ;
  • 박영배 (경희대학교 학과간협동과정 한방인체정보의학과)
  • Received : 2011.03.16
  • Accepted : 2011.04.11
  • Published : 2011.04.30

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of our study is to develop and verify questionnaire using temperament and character inventory (TCI) in the future by contemplating the comparative study on TCI and psychological testing Questionnaires. Methods: We investigate the research searched by keyword: 'TCI' and 'Questionnaire' through internet search engines, Pub Med, Science Direct and Springer Link. Results: The comparative study of TCI and psychological testing Questionnaires(SPAQ, BDI, TAS-20, MAC, DSQ) which have the purpose of diagnosing personal disorder is helpful for the verification of the level of adequacy of the concerned psychological testing Questionnaire and contributes to the understanding of psychobiological characteristics of each of personal disorders. The comparative study of TCI and psychological testing Questionnaires(MMPI, NEO, CPI) which have the purpose of comprehending general personality is helpful for the verification of the level of adequacy of the concerned psychological testing Questionnaire and contributes to the understanding of meaning of questionnaire-scales. The comparative study of TCI and constitution-psychological testing Questionnaire(QSCC II) is helpful for the verification of the level of adequacy and the understanding of the concerned constitution-psychological testing Questionnaire and contributes to the understanding of psychobiological characteristics of each of constitutions. Conclusions: TCI is a useful tool to understand the psychological testing Questionnaire more deeply and verify the level of the adequacy, and from now on for the development and verification of Oriental medicinal-psychological testing Questionnaire, the study comparing it with TCI should be actively used.

Keywords

References

  1. Hollingworth HL. Review of Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. Psychol Bull. 1938; 35: 103-107. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0052452
  2. Cloninger CR. Temperament and personality. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1994; 4: 266-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4388(94)90083-3
  3. Sung SM, Kim JH, Yang E, Abrams KY, Lyoo IK. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Temperament and Character Inventory. Compr Psychiatry. 2002; 43: 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1053/comp.2002.30794
  4. Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck TR. A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993; 50: 975-990. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008
  5. 채한. QSCC II 반복측정결과 동일체질로 판정된 사람의 기질 및 성격분석. 동의생리병리학회지. 2007; 21: 1319-1331.
  6. 신용섭, 이용범. 황제내경(黃帝內經)의 체질리론(體質理論)에 대한 연구(硏究). 대한한의학원전학회지. 2001; 14: 16-29.
  7. 채한, 박수잔, 이수진, 고광찬. 사상 유형학의 성격심리학적 고찰. 대한한의학회지. 2004; 25: 151-164.
  8. Kuon DW. A Study Of Constitution Acupucture. Journal of the International Congress of Acupuncture & Moxibustion. 1965; 10: 104-167.
  9. 홍준근, 이문수, 김승현, 조숙행, 정인과. SPAQ에 의한 계절성과 TCI에 의해 평가된 기질과 성격과의 관련성 - 한국 고등학생을 대상으로 -. 정신신체의학. 2007; 15: 35-43.
  10. 안정숙, 채규만. 스트레스, 성격특성과 우울증간의 관계에 관한 연구: 자기 주도성의 조절 효과를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지. 2007; 12: 813-832.
  11. Picardi A, Toni A, Caroppo E. Stability of alexithymia and its relationships with the 'big five' factors, temperament, character, and attachment style. Psychother Psychosom. 2005; 74: 371-378. https://doi.org/10.1159/000087785
  12. Conway KP, Kane RJ, Ball SA, Poling JC, Rounsaville BJ. Personality, substance of choice, and polysubstance involvement among substance dependent patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003; 71: 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(03)00068-1
  13. Mulder RT, Joyce PR, Sullivan PF, Bulik CM, Carter FA. The relationship among three models of personality psychopathology: DSM-III-R personality disorder, TCI scores and DSQ defences. Psychol Med. 1999; 29: 943-951. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291799008533
  14. 양귀화. TCI(기질 및 성격 검사)와 MMPI(다면적 인성검사)의 관계 :2008 학생생활연구소 내방 학생을 중심으로. 학생생활연구. 2008;21: 15-29.
  15. 신연주. 공황장애환자의 기질 및 성격 특성에 따른 임상표현양상. 경북대학교 대학원 심리학과 문학석사학위논문, 2009, 6.
  16. De Fruyt F, De Clercq BJ, van de Wiele L, Van Heeringen K. The validity of Cloninger's psychobiological model versus the five-factor model to predict DSM-IV personality disorders in a heterogeneous psychiatric sample: domain facet and residualized facet descriptions. J Pers. 2006; 74: 479-510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00382.x
  17. Mikołajczyk E, Zietek J, Samochowiec A, Samochowiec J. Personality dimensions measured using the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) and NEO-FFI on a Polish sample. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008; 17: 210-219. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.264
  18. Anghelescu I, Klawe C, Singer P, Fehr C, Hiemke C, Quante A, Regen F, Dahmen N, Szegedi A. Low novelty seeking and high self directedness scores in alcohol-dependent patients without comorbid psychiatric disorders omozygous for the A10 allele of the dopamine transporter gene. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2010; 11: 382-389. https://doi.org/10.3109/15622970701775058
  19. Rosenthal NE. Seasonal affective disorder. A description of the syndrome and preliminary findings with light therapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984; 41: 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790120076010
  20. Sifneos PE. The prevalence of 'alexithymic' characteristics in psychosomatic patients. Psychother Psychosom. 1973; 22: 255-262. https://doi.org/10.1159/000286529
  21. Bagby RM, The Twenty-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. J Psychosom Res. 1994; 38: 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(94)90006-X
  22. MacAndrew C. What the MAC scale tells us about men alcoholics. An interpretive review. J Stud Alcohol. 1981; 42: 604-625.
  23. Bond M, Gardner ST, Christian J, Sigal JJ. Empirical study of self-rated defense styles. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983; 40: 333-338. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790030103013
  24. Bosscha MA, van Velzen CJ, Meesters Y. A comparative study of two methods of personality assessment, the TCI and the NVM (Dutch shortened version of the MMPI). Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2006; 48: 435-444.
  25. Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR. Personality disorders and the five factor model of personality. J Personal Disord. 1990; 4: 362-371. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1990.4.4.362
  26. Gough HG. California Psychological Inventory. CA. Consulting Psychologists Press. 1987.
  27. 유정희, 이의주, 고병희, 송일병, 김태연. 사상체질분류검사지(QSCC II)의 Upgrade 연구 (I) - 사상체질분류검사지(QSCC II)에 의한 체질별 응답차이에 따른 문항분석 -. 사상체질의학회지. 2003; 15: 27-38.
  28. 최선미, 지상은, 정봉연, 안규석, 고병희, 성현제. QSCCII와 MBTI의 비교분석을 통한 사상체질의 성격유형 연구. 한국한의학연구원논문집. 2000; 6: 47-57.
  29. 김종열, 김경요, 송정모. 체질판별표를 이용한 체질판별의 객관화 방안. 사상체질의학회지. 1998; 10: 181-213.