DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Management Effectiveness Evaluation (MEE) Indicators Development in Protected Forest Areas

산림보호지역의 관리효과성 평가지표 개발 연구

  • Ryu, Kwangsu (Department of Environment & Forest Resources, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Jaeyong (Department of Environment & Forest Resources, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Gwangyu (Department of Landscape Architecture, Kangwon National University)
  • 류광수 (충남대학교 산림환경자원학과) ;
  • 최재용 (충남대학교 산림환경자원학과) ;
  • 이관규 (강원대학교 조경학과)
  • Received : 2011.01.18
  • Accepted : 2011.02.18
  • Published : 2011.02.28

Abstract

In order to develop the indicators which evaluate the management effectiveness for the protected forest areas in Korea, candidate indicators were listed based on literature and experts interviews, then questionnaire survey on the experts were conducted. 5 elements of context, planning, input, process, output and outcome and 32 indicators were selected. Context element includes 6 indicators of 1) documentation and assessment of values; 2) documentation and assessment of threats, 3) influence of government policy, 4) related regulations, 5) community cooperation and 6) the structure of management organization. 6 indicators of Planning element were 1) the management objective, 2) protected area design, 3) protected area size and number, 4) representation, 5) standards and categories and 6) management planning. Input element of 3 indicators were 1) management staff, 2) funding, 3) establishment and application of information. Process element were consisted of 1) governance, 2) management guidelines, 3) human resource management, 4) law enforcement, 5) eco-management, 6) disaster management, 7) education program and 8) research and monitoring. The element of outputs and outcomes were 1) accomplishment of plan, 2) accomplishment of program, 3) private land management, 4) threats change, 5) biodiversity change, 6) ecosystem health and vitality, 7) impact on community, 8) international management level and 9) visitors' satisfaction and variation in civil compliant. It is recommended to have further research on evaluation methods development by applying those above developed indicators for the protected forest areas to ensure the practicality of the indicators.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립산림과학원. 2009. 지속가능한 산림경영에 관한 대한민국 국가보고서.
  2. 국립수목원. 2008. 산림유전자원보호림의 식물자원 현황 실태조사 보고서.
  3. 문경시. 2010. 산림유전자원보호림 실태조사 및 연차별 사업계획수립 용역.
  4. 산림보호법 제7조, 시행규칙 제3조.
  5. 산림청. 2006. 산림유전자원보호림의 보전․관리방안에 관한 연구(1).
  6. 산림청. 2007. 산림유전자원보호림의 보전․관리방안에 관한 연구(2).
  7. 산림청. 2008. 국가 산림생물다양성 기본계획.
  8. 산림청. 2009. 우량대규모 산림유전자원보호림(소광리, 점봉산) 장기관리방안에 관한 연구.
  9. 산림청. 2010. 산림환경보호과 내부 자료.
  10. 허학영. 2006. 자연환경보호지역의 적응형 관리를 위한 관리효과성 평가모델에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 박사학위논문.
  11. 환경부․국립공원․제주도특별자치도․IUCN. 2009. 한국의 보호지역(보호지역 시스템에 대한 효과성 평가).
  12. Giligan, B., N. Duley, A. F. Tejada and H. Toivonen. 2005. Management Effectiveness Evaluation of Finland's Protected Areas. IUCN.
  13. Hockings, M. S., F. Leverington, N. Dudley and J. Courran. 2006. Evaluating Effectiveness - A framework for assesing management effectiveness of protected areas. IUCN.
  14. Leverington, F., M. Hockingsm H. Pavese and K. L. Costa. 2008a. Management Effectiveness Evaluation in Protected Areas:Report for the project 'Global study into management effectiveness evaluation of protected areas'. IUCN.
  15. Leverington, F., M. Hockings, H. Pavese, K. L. Costa and J. Courrau. 2008b. Management Effectiveness Evaluation in Protected Areas- A Global Study. Supplementary report No. 1:Overview of approaches and method- ologies. IUCN.
  16. UNEP. 2010. Report of the tenth meeting of the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity.
  17. http://www.cbd.int/protected.
  18. http://www.iucn.org/about/work/programes/pa.
  19. http://www.cbd.int/convention/results.

Cited by

  1. 우리나라 보호지역 관리효과성 평가 고찰 - 적용현황 및 평가결과를 중심으로 vol.16, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.34272/forest.2012.16.4.005