Prediction of Surface Crack Growth Considering the Wheel Load Increment Due to Rail Defect

레일손상에 의한 윤중증가를 고려한 표면균열 성장예측

  • Jun, Hyun-Kyu (R&D Strategy Division, Korea Railroad Research Institute) ;
  • Choi, Jin-Yu (R&D Strategy Division, Korea Railroad Research Institute) ;
  • Na, Sung-Hoon (Audit & Inspection Division, Korea Railroad Research Institute) ;
  • You, Won-Hee (High Speed Railroad Interface Research Division, KRRI)
  • 전현규 (한국철도기술연구원 기술전략실) ;
  • 최진유 (한국철도기술연구원 기술전략실) ;
  • 나성훈 (한국철도기술연구원 감사실) ;
  • 유원희 (한국철도기술연구원 고속철도인터페이스연구실)
  • Received : 2011.04.26
  • Accepted : 2011.06.15
  • Published : 2011.09.01

Abstract

Prediction of a minimum crack size for growth, which is defined as a crack size that grows fast enough to keep ahead of its removal by contact wear and periodic grinding, is the most demanding work to prevent rail from fatigue failure and develop cost effective railway maintenance strategy In this study, we investigated the wheel load increment due to a rail defect during a train ran over it, and its effect on the minimum crack size for growth. For this purpose, we developed simulation software based on the Fletcher and Kapoor's "2.5D" model and measured wheel load increment during a train passed over a defect. A maximum contact pressure and contact patch size were calculated by 3D FEM and crack growth analyses were performed by varying two of dominant contact contributors; surface friction coefficient(0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4) and crack aspect ratio. The minimum crack sizes for growth were calculated from 0.29 to 1.44mm depending on the contact conditions. They were decreasing with increasing surface friction coefficient and decreasing with crack aspect ratio(a/b).

Keywords

References

  1. Innotrack Guideline, "Recommendation of and scientific basis for minimum action rules and maintenance limits," Innotrack Report No. D4.2.6, 2006.
  2. Li, Z., Zhao, X., Esveld, C., Dellevoet, R. and Molodova, M., "An investigation into the causes of squats-Correlation analysis and numerical modeling," Wear, Vol. 265, No. 9-10, pp. 1349-1355, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2008.02.037
  3. Ringsberg, J. W. and Bergkvist, A., "On propagation of short rolling contact fatigue cracks," Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct., Vol. 26, No. 10, pp. 969-983, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00657.x
  4. Kaneta, M. and Murakami, Y., "Propagation of semielliptical surface cracks in lubricated rolling/sliding elliptical contacts," ASME Journal of Tribology, Vol. 113, No. 2, pp. 270-275, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2920616
  5. Bogdanski, S. and Brown, M. W., "Modeling the three-dimensional behavior of shallow rolling contact fatigue cracks in rails," Wear, Vol. 253, No. 1-2, pp. 17-25, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(02)00078-9
  6. Kim, B. S. and Moon, B. Y., "Crack face friction effects on mode II stress intensities for a surface cracked coating in two-dimensional rolling contact," Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 159-167, 2005.
  7. Choi, H. Y., Lee, D. H., You, W. H. and Lee, J. S., "Wheel-rail contact analysis considering the deformation of wheel and axle," Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 8, pp. 20-27, 2010.
  8. Fletcher, D. I. and Kapoor, A., "Rapid method of stress intensity factor calculation for semielliptical surface breaking cracks under three-dimensional contact loading," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F, Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 220, No. F3, pp. 219-234, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544097JRRT27
  9. Li, Y., Kang, G., Wang, C., Dou, P. and Wang, J., "Vertical short-crack behavior and its application in rolling contact fatigue," International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 28, No. 7, pp. 804-811, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.047
  10. Akama, M. and Mori, T., "Boundary element analysis of effects of crack face friction and trapped fluid on rolling contact fatigue cracks," Quarterly Report of RTRI, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 231-237, 2005. https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr.46.231
  11. Rooke, D. P., Rayaprolu, D. B. and Aliabadi, M. H., "Crack line and edge green's functions for stress intensity factors of inclined edge cracks," Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 441-461, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1992.tb01286.x
  12. Engineering Science Data Unit, "Contact phenomenon III : Calculation of individual stress components in concentrated elastic contacts under combined normal and tangential loading," IHS Report No. 85007, 1994.
  13. Jun, H. K. and Seo, J. W., "Experimental and analytical study on the fatigue crack growth under rolling contact fatigue," Proceedings of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering Spring Conference, pp. 1539-1540, 2011.
  14. Smith, R. A., "Hatfield Memorial Lecture 2007, Railways and materials: synergetic progress," Ironmaking and Steelmaking, Vol. 35, No. 7, pp. 505-513, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1179/174328108X318888
  15. SIMULIA, "ABAQUS 6.7.1 User's manual," 2008.
  16. Dubourg, M. C. and Lamacq, V., "A predictive rolling contact fatigue crack growth model: Onset of branching, direction and growth-Role of dry and lubricated conditions on crack patterns," Journal of Tribology, Vol. 124, No. 4, pp. 680-688, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1479698
  17. Kapoor, A. and Fletcher, D. I., "The effect of residual stress on contact stress driven crack growth in rail - the model," Newrail Report No. WR061106-2, p. 11, 2006.