Journal of the Korean housing association (한국주거학회논문집)

The Korean Housing Association (한국주거학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Evaluation Method of CPTED in Multi-Family Housing

공동주택단지의 범죄 예방 설계를 위한 평가방법에 관한 연구

  • 이유미 (상명대학교 소비자주거학과) ;
  • 임동현 (고려대학교 대학원) ;
  • 강부성 (서울과학기술대학교 건축학부)
  • Received : 2011.04.06
  • Accepted : 2011.08.05
  • Published : 2011.08.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to make evaluation method as a means to evaluate the crime prevention through environmental design of multi-family housing. According to the analysis of correctness and usefulness of evaluation method in multi-family housing, the preliminary evaluation method is selected. The correctness and usefulness of evaluation method is examined by 2 works. One is analyzing the results of experts' advice about evaluation method. The other is analyzing the results of the case studies of 3 housing sites. Those improve evaluation method to measure the crime prevention through environmental design objectively. As a result, the system of classification is divided into evaluation area and evaluation item. Evaluation area is sorted into four types, i.e. public space, semi-public space, semi-private space, and equipment. Evaluation scores according to evaluation area are different. Evaluation scores of public space are 73. Those of semipublic space are 196. Those of semi-private space are 75, Those of equipment are 28. Evaluation item is divided into 20 items. 20 items are; the entrance of complex, apartment building, recreational space and parking space etc. Checklists according to evaluation items are proposed and detail evaluation criteria according to checklist are proposed.

Keywords

References

  1. 강석진.이경훈 (2004). 공동주택단지 외부공간의 활성화와 단지내 범죄피해경험률의 관계에 대한 연구. 대한건축학회 논문집, 20(2), 71-77.
  2. 강석진.이경훈 (2010). 범죄 위험도 평가를 위한 지표 및 평가방법 연구. 한국위기관리 논집(계획계), 6(3), 144-171.
  3. 김흥순 (2007). 비성별적 도시의 모색: 도시환경요소가 주는 잠재적 범죄위협에 대한 여성인식의 고찰. 대한국토.도시계획학회지 국토계획, 22(1), 35-50.
  4. 박형민.황지태.황정인.황의갑.박경돈 (2009). 범죄예방을 위한 환경설계의 제도화 방안(2). 한국형사정책연구원, 55-134.
  5. 서울특별시 균형발전본부 (2009). 서울시 재정비촉진(뉴타운)사업 "범죄예방 환경설계(CPTED)"지침. 2-28.
  6. 신의기 외 (2008). 범죄예방을 위한 환경설계의 제도화 방안. 한국형사정책연구원, 95-101, 117-120.
  7. 이경훈.정요진 (2006). 共同住宅의 重要設計要素 導出 및 요소별 居住滿足度에 관한 硏究. 대한건축학회 논문집(계획계), 22(4), 3-12.
  8. 이상원.김상균 (2009). 공동주택 방범평가 지표개발연구. 한국 공안 행정 학회보, 37, 227-259.
  9. 이유미.백혜선 (2008). 범죄로부터의 안전성 평가 지표와 범죄불안감간의 상관성 분석에 관한 연구. 대한건축학회 논문집, 24(10), 121-128.
  10. 이제선.박현호.오세경 (2008). 환경설계를 통한 범죄예방(CPTED)의 한국적 도입을 위한 예비적 고찰. 한국지역개발학회지, 20(2), 213-232.
  11. 이형복 (2010). CPTED를 통한 대전의 범죄예방 정책방안. 대전발전연구원, 17-84, 140-144.
  12. 최 열.임하경 (2005). 초고층아파트 공동공간의 범죄불안감 특성 분석. 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 21(7), 57-6.
  13. Brunson L., Kuo FE, & Sullivan WC. (2001). Resident appropriation of defensible space in public housing: Implications for safety and community. Environment and Behavior, 33(5), 626-652. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973160
  14. Ray, J. (1977). Crime Prevention through Environmental Design. (Second Edition). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  15. Crowe, T. (2000). Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design: Applications of Architectural Design and Space Management Concpets, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. 330-341.
  16. Minnery, J., & Lim, B. (2005). Measuring Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 22 no. 4, Locke Science Publishing Company, Winter.
  17. Casteel, C., & Corinne, P. (2000). Effectiveness of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) in Reducing Robberies, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18(4S). 99-115
  18. Department of Community Development Services, City of Federal Way (2009). Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Checklist Instructions. 1-9.
  19. Jongejan, A. (2008). A. Urban planning in the Residential Environment using The Dutch 'Police Label Secure Housing', Politie Keurmerk veilig wonen.
  20. National Crime Prevention Council of Singapore (2003). Crime Prevention through Environmental Design Guidebook.
  21. New South Wale Police Force, Residential House and Unit Complex Assessment (2007). http://www.police.nsw.gov.au /community_issues/crime_prevention/residential
  22. Newman, O. (1972). Defensible Space: Crime Prevention Through Urban Design. New York: Collier Books.
  23. rmitage, R., & Monchuk, L. (2009). Re?.evaluating Secured by Design (SBD) Housing In West Yorkshire, A Project Financed by West Yorkshire Police, ACPO CPI and The University of Huddersfield.
  24. 中迫由實.瀨戶章子 (2005). 大阪防犯モデルマンション登 錄制度に關する考察-賃貸マンション營者への聞き取り調査を通じて. 日本建築學會技術報告集, 21, 227-230.
  25. 中迫由實.瀨戶章子 (2007). 單身者を對象とした民間賃貸 マンションの防犯性能の現狀と課題 : 般賃貸マンションと 防犯モデルマンションの比較. 日本建築學會計畵系論文集, 614, 25-32.
  26. 淺見泰司 (2001). 住環境水準の指標. 都市住宅學 33, 39-44.
  27. (社)日本都市計劃學會 編 (1999). 安全と再生の都市づくり, 學藝出版社, 京都, 19-22.
  28. 住環境の計劃編輯委員會 (1987). 住環境の計劃 5 住環を境 整備する. 彰國社, 39.

Cited by

  1. Application of Design Factor for Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design in Apartment Complex vol.25, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5934/kjhe.2016.25.4.497