DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Setting the Service Reliability Target for Meeting the Punctuality Requirement of the Railroad System

철도시스템 정시성 요구조건을 만족하기 위한 서비스 신뢰도 목표값 설정

  • 김종운 (한국철도기술연구원 철도환경연구실) ;
  • 박준서 (한국철도기술연구원 철도환경연구실) ;
  • 정인수 (한국철도공사 수도권철도차량정비단)
  • Received : 2010.09.27
  • Accepted : 2010.12.08
  • Published : 2011.02.26

Abstract

This article deals with a problem of setting reliability targets of the railroad systems where the punctuality target is given to the operator and a penalty is imposed for the year when the target is not met. The operator should set the reliability targets of the railroad system and sub-systems because the reliability affects the expected number of years when the penalty is imposed. This paper presents a procedure for setting the service reliability target and equations to calculate the expected number of years when the penalty is imposed and the probability that the operator should pay the penalty per year according to the mean kilometer between service failures of the railroad system and sub-systems.

본 연구는 정시성의 목표값이 운영 요구조건으로 주어지고 이를 달성하지 못한 해당연도에는 철도운영자에게 패널티가 부과되는 상황에서 철도시스템의 신뢰도 목표값을 설정하는 문제를 다룬다. 철도시스템의 신뢰도에 따라 총 운영기간동안 패널티 부과 회수가 달라지기 때문에 철도운영자는 이를 고려하여 철도시스템 및 하위시스템에 대해 신뢰도 목표값을 설정할 필요가 있다. 본 논문은 철도운영자가 운영기간 동안의 패널티 부과회수를 고려하여 철도시스템의 서비스 신뢰도 목표로 설정할 수 있도록 철도시스템 및 하위시스템의 서비스 고장 간 거리에 따라 연간 패널티 부과 확률 및 철도시스템의 운영연수 동안 패널티 부과 회수를 산출하는 절차 및 계산식을 제안한다.

Keywords

References

  1. D.V. Petkar (1980, Setting up reliability goals for system, Reliability Engineering, 1(1), pp 43-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-8174(80)90013-X
  2. J.P. Rooney (1983) Setting reliability goals for PROCEDD control instrumentation, Control Engineering, 30(2), pp. 94-96.
  3. S. Carlier, M. Coindoz, L. Denuville, L. Garbellini, A. Altavilla (1996), Evaluation of reliability, availability, maintainability and safety requirements for manned space vehicles with extended on-orbit stay time, Acta Astraunautca, 38(2), pp. 115-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-5765(96)00006-9
  4. P.H. Tatry, F. Deneu, L. Simonotti (1997) RAMS approach for reusable launch vehicle advanced studies, Acta Astraunautca, 41(11), pp. 791-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-5765(97)00194-X
  5. H.G. Lee, J.H. Choi (2000) A study on the RAM Object Values, Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 3( 1), pp. 220-230.
  6. I.S Chung, K.W. Lee, J.W. Kim (2008) Study on setting the quantitative RAM goals for rolling stock, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 11(4), pp. 390-397.
  7. UIC Code 450-2 (2009) Assessment of the performance of the network related to rail traffic operation for the purpose of quality analyses - delay coding and delay cause attribution process
  8. Z. Vintr, R. Holub (2001) R&M requirements allocation in upgrading a system, Reliability and Maintainability Symposium Annual Proceedings, pp. 258-263.

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Quantitative Prediction Model for Setting the Target Value of Service Availability for a LRT Line vol.15, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2012.15.3.278
  2. Requirement Analysis and Development of TCMS vol.14, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2011.14.6.507
  3. Analysis of Operational Issues for ICT-based On-Board Train Control System vol.14, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2011.14.6.575