DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Policy Measures for Amending the Modal Shift Grant Scheme in Korea

철도물류활성화를 위한 모달쉬프트 보조금제도 발전방향

  • 김현 (한국교통연구원 철도연구실) ;
  • 문진수 (한국교통연구원 철도연구실)
  • Received : 2010.12.31
  • Accepted : 2011.03.23
  • Published : 2011.04.26

Abstract

Korean government has introduced the modal shift grant scheme in July 2010 to help the competitiveness of carriage of rail freight and awarded a grant to private companies shifting mode of transportation from road to rail in the carriage of freight: the additional costs incurred in the modal shift are supported by the government. However, there arise needs for the amendment of the modal shift grant scheme. This study reviewed the modal shift grant schemes of foreign countries, such as EU, UK and Japan, and drew implications. Furthermore, this study suggested the future directions of the modal shift grant scheme from the respects of the maximization of the effects of the grant scheme, continual rail use of existing rail freight, and justification of the grant scheme. Finally, policy measures amending the existing modal shift grant scheme were suggested.

국내 철도화물의 경쟁력 제고를 위해 정부는 2010년 7월부터 모달쉬프트 보조금제도를 도입하고 도로 운송에서 철도로 전환시 발생하는 추가비용을 지원하고 있으나, 아직 제도시행 초기단계로서 제도의 보완 및 개선 필요성이 제기되고 있다. 본 연구는 유럽연합, 영국, 일본 등 오랜 기간 모달쉬프트 보조금제도를 운용해온 사례의 검토를 통하여 시사점을 도출하였다. 또한 국내 철도 전환보조금 지원방향을 보조금효과 극대화 측면, 기존철도물량의 지속적 확보 측면, 지원의 정당성확보 측면에서 제시하고, 현 보조금제도의 발전방향을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (1990-2009) Statistical Yearbook of MLTM.
  2. KORAIL (2010) Accounting Report of KORAIL for the year of 2009.
  3. Korea Environment Institute (2002) A Comparative Study on the Environmental Aspects of the Surface Transportation.
  4. B.V. Wee, P. Janse, R.V.D. Brink (2005) Comparing Energy use and Environmental Performance of Land Transport Models, Transport Reviews.
  5. ECMT (1996) Towards fair and efficient pricing in transport.
  6. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2001) Macroeconomic Analysis of Transport Environment Policies including the Reduction of the Green House Gas.
  7. Marco Polo Program (http://ec.europa.eu/transport/marcopolo/)
  8. Commission of the European Communities (2008) Impact Assessment of Marco Polo Program (Commission Staff Working Document).
  9. Department for Transport (2006) Guide to Freight Facilities Grant in England.
  10. Department for Transport (2006) Rail Environmental Benefit Procurement Scheme.
  11. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (2009) Internal Source.
  12. The Korea Transport Institute (2009) Estimation of Transportation Accident Cost for the year of 2007.
  13. The Korea Transport Institute (2008) Estimation of Transportation Congestion Cost for the year of 2007.
  14. The Korea Transport Institute (2009) Survey of National Transportation Demand and Construction of Database for the year of 2008 (Survey of Transportation Congestion Cost and Internal & External Costs).
  15. J.S. Mun (2009) Support Measures for Domestic Rail Freight Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 13(1), pp. 151-160.

Cited by

  1. A Study on Expansion of Inland Railway Use For Container Cargo vol.19, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2016.19.1.97
  2. A Study on the Effects of Railway Logistics Information System Quality on the shipper's Satisfaction vol.14, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2011.14.4.376