Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (아시아태평양암예방학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Association Between TP53 Arg72Pro Polymorphism and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk: A Meta-analysis

  • Xu, Chang-Tao (Department of Hepatobiliary, the 309th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army) ;
  • Zheng, Fang (Department of Hepatobiliary, the 309th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army) ;
  • Dai, Xin (Department of Hepatobiliary, the 309th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army) ;
  • Du, Ji-Dong (Department of Hepatobiliary, the 309th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army) ;
  • Liu, Hao-Run (Department of Hepatobiliary, the 309th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army) ;
  • Zhao, Li (Department of Hepatobiliary, the 309th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army) ;
  • Li, Wei-Min (Department of Hepatobiliary, the 309th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army)
  • Published : 2012.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Previous studies on the association between the TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk obtained controversial findings. This study aimed to quantify the strength of the association by meta-analysis. Methods: We searched PubMed and Wangfang databases for published studies on the association between the TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and HCC risk, using the pooled odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for assessment. Results: 10 studies with a total of 2,026 cases and 2,733 controls were finally included into this meta-analysis. Overall, the TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism was not associated with HCC risk (all P values greaterth HCC risk in Caucasians in three genetic models (For Pro versus Arg, OR = 1.20, 95%CI 1.03-1.41; For ProPro versus ArgArg, OR = 1.74, 95%CI 1.23-2.47; For ProPro versus ArgPro/ArgArg, OR = 1.85, 95%CI 1.33-2.57). However, there was no significant association between the TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and HCC risk in East Asians (all P values greater than 0.10). No evidence of publication bias was observed. Conclusion: Meta-analyses of available data suggest an obvious association between the TP53 Arg72Pro and HCC risk in Caucasians. However, the TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism may have a race-specific effect on HCC risk and further studies are needed to elucidate this possible effect.

Keywords

References

  1. Anzola M, Cuevas N, Lopez-Martinez M, et al (2003). Frequent loss of p53 codon 72 Pro variant in hepatitis C virus-positive carriers with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett, 193, 199-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3835(03)00046-6
  2. Bridges JF, Joy SM, Gallego G, et al (2011). Needs for hepatocellular carcinoma control policy in the Asia-Pacific region. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 2585-91.
  3. Chen X, Liu F, Li B, et al (2011). p53 codon 72 polymorphism and liver cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. World J Gastroenterol, 17, 1211-8. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i9.1211
  4. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials, 7, 177-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
  5. Di Vuolo V, Buonaguro L, Izzo F, et al (2011). TP53 and MDM2 gene polymorphisms and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma among Italian patients. Infect Agent Cancer, 6, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-9378-6-13
  6. Dumont P, Leu JI, Della Pietra AC, 3rd, et al (2003). The codon 72 polymorphic variants of p53 have markedly different apoptotic potential. Nat Genet, 33, 357-65. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1093
  7. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315, 629-34. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
  8. El-Serag HB (2011). Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med, 365, 1118-27. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1001683
  9. Ezzikouri S, El Feydi AE, Chafik A, et al (2007). The Pro variant of the p53 codon 72 polymorphism is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in Moroccan population. Hepatol Res, 37, 748-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00126.x
  10. Ezzikouri S, Essaid El Feydi A, Afifi R, et al (2011). Impact of TP53 codon 72 and MDM2 promoter 309 allelic dosage in a Moroccan population with hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Biol Markers, 26, 229-33.
  11. Feng GS (2012). Conflicting roles of molecules in hepatocarcinogenesis: paradigm or paradox. Cancer Cell, 21, 150-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2012.01.001
  12. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J (2012). Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet, 379, 1245-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61347-0
  13. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327, 557-60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
  14. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al (2011). Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin, 61, 69-90. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20107
  15. Kimman M, Norman R, Jan S, et al (2012). The Burden of Cancer in Member Countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 411-20. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.2.411
  16. Leveri M, Gritti C, Rossi L, et al (2004). Codon 72 polymorphism of P53 gene does not affect the risk of cirrhosis and hepatocarcinoma in HCV-infected patients. Cancer Lett, 208, 75-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2004.02.016
  17. Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst, 22, 719-48.
  18. Pawlik P, Mostowska A, Lianeri M, et al (2012). Folate and choline metabolism gene variants in relation to ovarian cancer risk in the Polish population. Mol Biol Rep, 39, 5553-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-1359-0
  19. Peng T, Yan LN, Liu ZM, et al (2004). Significant association between p53 codon 72 Pro polymorphism and hepatocellular carcinoma risk in Guangxi. Chin J Surg, 42, 313-4. [Article in Chinese]
  20. Reinhardt HC, Schumacher B (2012). The p53 network: cellular and systemic DNA damage responses in aging and cancer. Trends Genet, 28, 128-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2011.12.002
  21. Riley T, Sontag E, Chen P, et al (2008). Transcriptional control of human p53-regulated genes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 9, 402-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2395
  22. Sia D, Villanueva A (2011). Signaling pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology, 81, 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1159/000333254
  23. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology. JAMA, 283, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
  24. Stuck AE, Rubenstein LZ, Wieland D (1998). Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Asymmetry detected in funnel plot was probably due to true heterogeneity. BMJ, 316, 469. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7129.469
  25. Sumbul AT, Akkiz H, Bayram S, et al (2012). p53 codon 72 polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma in the Turkish population: a casecontrol study. Mol Biol Rep, 39, 1639-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-0903-2
  26. Whibley C, Pharoah PD, Hollstein M (2009). p53 polymorphisms: cancer implications. Nat Rev Cancer, 9, 95-107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2584
  27. Xu Y, Liu L, Liu J, et al (2011). A potentially functional polymorphism in the promoter region of miR-34b/c is associated with an increased risk for primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer, 128, 412-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25342
  28. Yoon YJ, Chang HY, Ahn SH, et al (2008). MDM2 and p53 polymorphisms are associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Carcinogenesis, 29, 1192-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgn090
  29. Yu MW, Yang SY, Chiu YH, et al (1999). A p53 genetic polymorphism as a modulator of hepatocellular carcinoma risk in relation to chronic liver disease, familial tendency, and cigarette smoking in hepatitis B carriers. Hepatology, 29, 697-702. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510290330
  30. Zhang L, Liu W, Hao Q, et al (2012). Folate intake and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms as predictive and prognostic biomarkers for ovarian cancer risk. Int J Mol Sci, 13, 4009-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13044009
  31. Zhu ZZ, Cong WM, Liu SF, et al (2005). [p53 gene codon 72 polymorphism and genetic susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma in Chinese population]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 85, 76-9. [Article in Chinese]
  32. Zhu ZZ, Cong WM, Liu SF, et al (2005). Homozygosity for Pro of p53 Arg72Pro as a potential risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma in Chinese population. World J Gastroenterol, 11, 289-92. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i2.289
  33. Zhu ZZ, Cong WM, Liu SF, et al (2005). A p53 polymorphism modifies the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma among noncarriers but not carriers of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Cancer Lett, 229, 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2005.04.014
  34. Zhu ZZ, Cong WM, Zhu GS, et al (2005). [Association of p53 codon 72 polymorphism with genetic susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma in Chinese population]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi, 22, 632-5.[Article in Chinese]

Cited by

  1. Crosstalk between EGFR and p53 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma vol.15, pp.19, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.19.8069
  2. Association of rs1042522 Polymorphism with Increased Risk of Prostate Adenocarcinoma in the Pakistani Population and its HuGE Review vol.15, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.9.3973
  3. Effect of vascular endothelial growth factor siRNA and wild-type p53 co-expressing plasmid in MDA-MB-231 cells vol.13, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4571
  4. Evaluation of the p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and its association with cancer risk: a HuGE review and meta-analysis vol.97, pp.1469-5073, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672315000075