DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

XPC 939A>C and 499C>T Polymorphisms and Skin Cancer Risk: a Meta-analysis

  • Ji, Geng (Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Taizhou People's Hospital) ;
  • Lin, Yuan (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics & Ministry of Education Key Lab for Modern Toxicology, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University) ;
  • Cao, Song-Yu (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics & Ministry of Education Key Lab for Modern Toxicology, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University) ;
  • Li, Luo-Zhu (Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Taizhou People's Hospital) ;
  • Chen, Xin-Long (Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Taizhou People's Hospital) ;
  • Sun, Bu-Mei (Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Taizhou People's Hospital) ;
  • Chen, Chuan-Jun (Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Taizhou People's Hospital) ;
  • Ma, Hong-Xia (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics & Ministry of Education Key Lab for Modern Toxicology, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University)
  • Published : 2012.10.31

Abstract

The xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C gene (XPC) has been identified as important for repairing UV-related DNA damage. Some subtle changes in this gene may impair repair efficiency and influence susceptibility to human cancers, including skin cancer. Two polymorphisms in XPC, 939A>C (rs2228001) and 499C>T (rs2228000), are considered to have possible associations with the risk of skin cancer, but the reported results have been inconsistent. Here we performed a meta-analysis of the available evidence regarding the relationship between these two polymorphisms and the risk of skin cancer. All relevant studies were searched using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science before February 2012. A total of 8 case-control studies were included in this analysis, and no convincing associations between the two polymorphisms and risk of skin cancer were observed in any of the genetic models. Stratified analyses by skin cancer type also did not detect significant associations in any subgroup. This meta-analysis suggested that the XPC 939A>C and 499C>T polymorphisms may have little involvement in susceptibility to skin cancer.

Keywords

References

  1. Zheng T, Holford TR, Mayne ST, et al (2001). Lactation and breast cancer risk: a case-control study in Connecticut. Br J Cancer, 84, 1472-6. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.1793
  2. Begg CB, Hummer AJ, Mujumdar U, et al (2006). A design for cancer case-control studies using only incident cases: experience with the GEM study of melanoma. Int J Epidemiol, 35, 756-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyl044
  3. Blankenburg S, König IR, Moessner R, et al (2005). Assessment of 3 xeroderma pigmentosum group C gene polymorphisms and risk of cutaneous melanoma: a case-control study. Carcinogenesis, 26, 1085-90. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgi055
  4. Blankenburg S, König IR, Moessner R, et al (2005). No association between three xeroderma pigmentosum group C and one group G gene polymorphisms and risk of cutaneous melanoma. Eur J Hum Genet, 13, 253-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201296
  5. Cust AE, Schmid H, Maskiell JA, et al (2009). Populationbased, case-control-family design to investigate genetic and environmental influences on melanoma risk: Australian Melanoma Family Study. Am J Epidemiol, 170, 1541-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp307
  6. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315, 629-34. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
  7. Festa F, Kumar R, Sanyal S, et al (2005). Basal cell carcinoma and variants in genes coding for immune response, DNA repair, folate and iron metabolism. Mutat Res, 574, 105-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.01.026
  8. Figl A, Scherer D, Nagore E, et al (2010). Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA-repair genes and cutaneous melanoma. Mutat Res, 702, 8-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.06.011
  9. Francisco G, Menezes PR, Eluf-Neto J, et al (2008). XPC polymorphisms play a role in tissue-specific carcinogenesis: a meta-analysis. Eur J Hum Genet, 16, 724-34. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2008.6
  10. Goncalves FT, Francisco G, de Souza SP, et al (2011). European ancestry and polymorphisms in DNA repair genes modify the risk of melanoma: a case-control study in a high UV index region in Brazil. J Dermatol Sci, 64, 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2011.06.003
  11. Gordon RM (2009). Skin cancer: more than skin deep. Nurse Pract, 34, 20-7.
  12. Gozukara EM, Khan SG, Metin A, et al (2001). A stop codon in xeroderma pigmentosum group C families in Turkey and Italy: molecular genetic evidence for a common ancestor. J Invest Dermatol, 117, 197-204. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1747.2001.01424.x
  13. Hemminki K, Xu G, Kause L, et al (2002). Demonstration of UV-dimers in human skin DNA in situ 3 weeks after exposure. Carcinogenesis, 23, 605-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/23.4.605
  14. Hu Z, Wang Y, Wang X, et al (2005). DNA repair gene XPC genotypes/haplotypes and risk of lung cancer in a Chinese population. Int J Cancer, 115, 478-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.20911
  15. Ibarrola-Villava M, Peña-Chilet M, Fernandez LP, et al (2011). Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair and oxidative stress pathways associated with malignant melanoma susceptibility. Eur J Cancer, 47, 2618-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.05.011
  16. Khan SG, Muniz-Medina V, Shahlavi T, et al (2002). The human XPC DNA repair gene: arrangement, splice site information content and influence of a single nucleotide polymorphism in a splice acceptor site on alternative splicing and function. Nucleic Acids Res, 30, 3624-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkf469
  17. Kusumoto R, Masutani C, Sugasawa K, et al (2001). Diversity of the damage recognition step in the global genomic nucleotide excision repair in vitro. Mutat Res, 485, 219-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8777(00)00082-3
  18. Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH (1997). Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med, 127, 820-6. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-9-199711010-00008
  19. Lehmann AR (2003). DNA repair-deficient diseases, xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome and trichothiodystrophy. Biochimie, 85, 1101-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2003.09.010
  20. Leiter U, Garbe C (2008). Epidemiology of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer--the role of sunlight. Adv Exp Med Biol, 624, 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77574-6_8
  21. Li C, Hu Z, Liu Z, et al (2006). Polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes XPC, XPD, and XPG and risk of cutaneous melanoma: a case-control analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 15, 2526-32. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0672
  22. Lohmueller KE, Pearce CL, Pike M, et al (2003). Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease. Nat Genet, 33, 177-82. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1071
  23. Meyer T (2009). Molecular events in skin cancer. Cancer Treat Res, 146, 189-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78574-5_16
  24. Moriwaki S, Takahashi Y (2008). Photoaging and DNA repair. J Dermatol Sci, 50, 169-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2007.08.011
  25. Mueller CS, Reichrath J (2008). Histology of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol, 624, 215-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77574-6_17
  26. Niu W, Qi Y (2011). An updated meta-analysis of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene: three well-characterized polymorphisms with hypertension. PLoS One, 6, e24266. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024266
  27. Petitti DB (1994). Meta-analysis, decision analysis, and costeffectiveness analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  28. Sugasawa K, Ng JM, Masutani C, et al (1998). Xeroderma pigmentosum group C protein complex is the initiator of global genome nucleotide excision repair. Mol Cell, 2, 223-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80132-X
  29. Thirumaran RK, Bermejo JL, Rudnai P, et al (2006). Single nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and basal cell carcinoma of skin. Carcinogenesis, 27, 1676-81.
  30. Vodicka P, Kumar R, Stetina R, et al (2004). Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and possible links with DNA repair rates, chromosomal aberrations and singlestrand breaks in DNA. Carcinogenesis, 25, 757-63.
  31. Vodicka P, Stetina R, Polakova V, et al (2007). Association of DNA repair polymorphisms with DNA repair functional outcomes in healthy human subjects. Carcinogenesis, 28, 657-64.
  32. Wood RD, Mitchell M, Lindahl T (2005). Human DNA repair genes, 2005. Mutat Res, 577, 275-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.03.007
  33. Young C (2009). Solar ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer. Occup Med (Lond), 59, 82-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqn170

Cited by

  1. DNA Repair Gene Associated with Clinical Outcome of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Treated with Platinum-based Chemotherapy vol.14, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.2.941
  2. Note of Clarification of Data in the Meta-analysis of XPC 939A>C and 499C>T Polymorphisms in Skin Cancer vol.14, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.4.2687
  3. XPD Lys751Gln and Asp312Asn Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Skin Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 17 Case-control Studies vol.15, pp.16, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.16.6619
  4. Polymorphisms of the XPC gene may contribute to the risk of head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis vol.35, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-1520-6
  5. A Systematic Quality Evaluation of Meta-Analyses Related to Plastic Surgery vol.78, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000757