Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration (간호행정학회지)

Korean Academy of Nursing Administration (한국간호행정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Action Learning Approaches on Learning Outcomes in Nursing Management Courses

액션러닝 기반 간호관리학 강의 및 실습 운영의 효과

  • Jang, Keum Seong (College of Nursing, Chonnam National University, Chonnam Research Institute of Nursing Science) ;
  • Park, Soon Joo (Chonnam Research Institute of Nursing Science)
  • 장금성 (전남대학교 간호대학, 전남대학교 간호과학연구소) ;
  • 박순주 (을지대학교 간호대학)
  • Received : 2012.11.07
  • Accepted : 2012.11.20
  • Published : 2012.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify effects of action learning approaches on learning outcomes of students taking nursing management courses. Methods: The questionnaire surveys were completed between March 2011 and June 2012 by 109 undergraduate seniors in the nursing department of C University. Survey data were obtained 3 times: before, in and after the study of nursing management. The course consisted of lectures and clinical practices. Learning outcomes were measured through problem solving skills, team efficacy, and class satisfaction. Collected data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA with the SPSS 20.0 program Results: Scores for problem solving skills (F=13.67, p<.001) and team efficacy (F=4.49, p=.012) showed statistically significant increases after the course. The scores also increased significantly after the lectures for 5 of 9 problem solving skill subscales: analysis skill, divergent thinking, decision making, assessment, feedback, and after the clinical practices for 2 subscales: divergent thinking, and execution and risk taking. Class satisfaction score also increased after both the lectures and the clinical practices. Conclusion: The findings from this study suggest that an action learning approaches for nursing management courses would be a useful teaching and learning method to achieve learning outcomes.

Keywords

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  2. Bong, H. C. (2012). Do action learning for success. Seoul: Hangseong B wave.
  3. Bong, H. C., & Kim, J. I. (2003, March). A try to escape from desperate dilemma of university education: Management class that action learning has changed. Invited lecture presented at Hanyang University Teaching and Learning Center Symposium, Seoul, Korea
  4. Bourner, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & France, L. F. (2000). Action learning across a university community. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37, 2-9. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/135580000362025
  5. Greenwood, J. (2000). Critique of the graduate nurse: An international perspective. Nurse Education Today, 20, 17-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2000.0424
  6. Heidari, F., & Galvin, K. (2003). Action learning groups: Can they help students develop their knowledge and skills? Nurse Education in Practice, 3, 49-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1471-5953(02)00054-9
  7. Hur, Y. J. (2009). Case study on develop and practical use an action learning program for 'information society's teaching method' of graduate school of education. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 25(1), 22-52.
  8. Jang, K. S., Baek, M., Choi, Y. J., Ahn, S. H., Lee, S. J., Sim, J. Y., et al. (2006). An analysis of nurse managers's common fundamental competencies changes and responses to the application of the action learning. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, 12, 424-433.
  9. Jang, S. H. (2011). Search on morality that Korean society requires: Focused on the case of teaching-learning in elementary moral education applying action learning. Elementary Moral Education, 36, 111-142.
  10. Kim, E. J. (2004). The effects of students achievement level and communication orientation on cooperative learning class satisfaction. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 42(3), 123-151.
  11. Kim, H. S., Hwang, K. S., Kwon, S. C., Hong, S. U., Oh, J. S., Koh, B. S., et al. (2012). A study on the core competencies lecture effectiveness analysis adapted action learning. Tamra Culture, 41, 78-109.
  12. Kim, J. I., Park, Y. K., & Lee, K. H. (2006). A case study on the process reengineering by action learning program: Focusing on a training program in Hyosung corporation. Information Systems Review, 8(1), 289-303.
  13. Kim, Y. M. (2012). Evaluation of design and operation of action learning based nursing professionalism course for nursing students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
  14. Kim, Y. M., & Kim, Y. H. (2010). Development and evaluation of action learning in clinical practice of nursing management. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 10(6), 312-322. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.6.312
  15. Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education (2012). Key competencies and learning outcomes. Retrieved November 5, 2012, from http://www.kabon.or.kr/HyAdmin/upload/goodFile/120121105102905.pdf
  16. Kwon, E. M. (2010). The correlation among team efficacy, interpersonal understanding, proactivity in problem solving and team performance. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  17. Lee, S. J. (2009). The effects of action learning program on nurses's problem solving and communication skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
  18. Lee, S. J., Chang, Y. K., Lee, H. N., & Park, K. Y. (2003). A study on the development of life-skills: Communication, problem solving, and self-directed learning. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute
  19. Lee, Y. M., Kim, T. J., Kim, J. I., Jang, S. P., & Hong, J. Y. (2006). The effects of task types and collaboration procedures on task performance and group efficacy in web-based situational learning environment. Journal of Educational Studies, 37(3), 47-75.
  20. Marquardt, M. J. (2007). Action learning: Resolving real problems in real time. In M. Silberman (Ed.), The handbook of experiential learning (pp. 94-110). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
  21. Marshall, L. C. (2003). The relationship between efficacy, teamwork, effort and patient satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, L.A.
  22. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1991). Performance Appraisal. Boston: Ally and Bacon.
  23. Park, M. S. (2009). A longitudinal study on the factors affecting team performance among college students: The development of team efficacy perspective. Unpublished master's thesis, Hoseo University, Asan, Korea.
  24. Roh, H. L. (2007). Identifying design factors of action learning in higher education. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 13(3), 53-78.

Cited by

  1. The Effect of the Cultural Competence in Multicultural Nursing Education by Action Learning vol.15, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.11.6527
  2. Comparative Study on Self-leadership, Team Efficacy, Problem Solving Process and Task Satisfaction of Nursing Students in Response to Clinical Training vol.20, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2014.20.4.482
  3. The Effect of Case-based Learning (CBL) on Critical Thinking Disposition, Communication Ability, Problem Solving Ability and Self-directed Learning Ability of Nursing Students in Pathophysiology Course vol.18, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2016.18.3.176
  4. The Effects of Lessons using Action Learning on Nursing Students vol.22, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2016.22.1.42
  5. Effects of Learning Activities on Application of Learning Portfolio in Nursing Management Course vol.46, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2016.46.1.90
  6. Analysis of Students Experience related of Nursing Management Clinical Practice: Text Network Analysis Method vol.22, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2016.22.1.80
  7. A Literature Review of Research on Action Learning-based Nursing Education in South Korea vol.24, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2018.24.1.73
  8. 액션러닝이 간호사의 문제해결능력, 의사소통, 정서창의성 및 혁신행동에 미치는 효과 vol.8, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12811/kshsm.2014.8.2.073
  9. Analysis of the Research Trend of Action Learning in School vol.27, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2015.27.3.429
  10. 액션러닝 기반 영적간호 교육 프로그램이 간호대학생의 영적요구, 영적안녕 및 영적간호역량에 미치는 효과 vol.16, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2016.16.01.285
  11. 액션러닝을 활용한 노인간호학실습 수업 운영의 효과 vol.17, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2016.17.5.421
  12. 액션러닝기반 간호과정 학습프로그램이 문제해결능력 및 자기주도적 학습능력에 미치는 효과 vol.16, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2016.16.12.035
  13. 간호학 전공수업에 적용한 블렌디드 러닝이 학업성취도 및 자기주도적 학습능력에 미치는 효과 vol.17, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2017.17.12.330
  14. 액션러닝 기반 간호윤리교육이 간호대학생의 자기표현성과 윤리적가치관에 미치는 효과 vol.24, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5953/jmjh.2017.24.3.179
  15. 간호대학생의 관리실습 전후 문제해결능력, 간호사 이미지, 리더십 변화 vol.35, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12925/jkocs.2018.35.1.122
  16. A study on Characteristics of Action Learning by Analyzing Learners’ Experiences of University class vol.28, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.28.1.201803.381
  17. 액션러닝 기반 건강사정 수업 운영의 간호대학생의 건강사정에 대한 자신감, 건강사정 지식, 비판적 사고능력, 수업 만족도에 대한 효과 vol.25, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2018.25.4.259
  18. Experience of Nursing Management Practice in Graduate Nurses vol.25, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2019.25.4.259
  19. 액션러닝을 활용한 구강보건교육학 수업이 의사소통능력과 문제해결능력에 미치는 융합적 학습효과 vol.9, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.22156/cs4smb.2019.9.11.212
  20. 동료 교수학습 기반 자율실습이 핵심기본간호술 숙련도, 수행자신감 및 자아효능감에 미치는 효과에 관한 융합연구 vol.10, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15207/jkcs.2019.10.12.453
  21. 융합수업 운영이 사회맞춤형교육과정 간호대학생의 자기주도적 학습능력, 문제해결 능력과 전공만족도에 미치는 효과 vol.18, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.22678/jic.2020.18.3.099
  22. 기초간호과학 수업에서 액션러닝 적용 사례연구 : 성찰일지 내용분석 중심으로 vol.19, pp.8, 2012, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2021.19.8.397
  23. Nursing Students’ Experience of Action Learning in Clinical Practice of Nursing Management vol.33, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.13000/jfmse.2021.10.33.5.1114