Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society (한국지반공학회논문집)

Korean Geotechnical Society (한국지반공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dynamic Deformation Characteristics of Joomunjin Standard Sand Using Cyclic Triaxial Test

반복삼축압축시험을 이용한 주문진 표준사의 동적변형특성 분석

  • Kim, You-Seong (Dept. of Civil Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Ko, Hyoung-Woo (Dept. of Civil Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Hong (Dept. of Civil Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Gwang (Dept. of Civil Engineering, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2012.05.21
  • Accepted : 2012.11.23
  • Published : 2012.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the modified cyclic triaxial tests with Joomunjin standard sand are performed for dynamic deformation characteristics, such as Young's moduli and damping ratio. The cyclic triaxial test is equipped with Local Displacement Transducer (LDT) on the outside of a cell which has a range from $10^{-4}$ to $10^{-1}$ of shear strains, ${\gamma}$ (%), instead of conventional cyclic triaxial test which has linear variable displacement transducer (LVDT) with low precision. With the small strain control, tests were carried out at various loading rates, void ratios, and effective confining pressures. Based on the test results, such as dynamic deformation characteristics, shear modulus, and damping ratio, it is found that the test can measure more range of medium strains (0.02-0.2%) than results obtained from conventional test (resonant column test). For the medium strain range, dynamic deformation characteristics investigated by the cyclic triaxial test are also different from those predicted by nonlinear model in conventional test.

본 논문에서는 주문진 표준사를 대상으로 개량된 반복삼축압축 시험장치를 이용하여 탄성계수와 감쇠비에 대한 변형특성을 분석하였다. 기존의 낮은 정밀도를 갖는 LVDT를 사용한 반복삼축시험기를 개량하여 정밀하고 넓은 영역의 동적변형특성을 얻기 위해서 전단변형률(${\gamma}$) $10^{-4}-10^{-1}%$ 범위의 측정을 제어하는 셀 외부 LDT와 내부의 시료에 LDT를 설치하여 사용하였다. 이러한 미소변형제어를 통하여 5가지의 재하속도 변화와 간극비를 구분하고 4가지의 구속응력 조건을 달리하여 반복삼축시험을 수행하였다. 시험결과를 바탕으로 전단탄성계수와 감쇠비를 여러 조건에 대하여 반복하중 및 변형률 크기의 영향을 비교하고 분석한 결과, 주문진 표준사의 기존(공진주 시험)의 동적변형특성 보다 넓은 구간에서 시험값들을 얻을 수 있었다. 또한, 공진주 시험에서 0.02% 이하의 미소변형률 구간에서 얻은 결과를 토대로 중간변형률 구간을 비선형 모델로 예측한 값들은 반복삼축시험으로 얻은 실험값들과 다른 변형특성을 나타내고 있음을 관찰할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Burland, J. B. (1989), "Small is Beautiful-the Stiffness of Soils at Small Strains," Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol.26, pp.499-516. https://doi.org/10.1139/t89-064
  2. Choo, Y. W. and Kim, D. S. (2005), "Dynamic Deformation Characteristics of Sands Under Various Drainage Conditions", Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society(KGS), Vol.21, No.3, pp.27-42.
  3. Dobry, R. and Vucetic, M. (1987), "State-of-the-art report: dynamic properties and response of soft clay deposits" Proceeding of International Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering Soft Soils, Vol.2, pp.51-87.
  4. Goto, S., Tatsuoka, F., Shibuya, S., Kim, Y. S., and Sato, T. (1991), "A simple Guage for Local Small Strain measurements in the Laboratory", Soil and Foundations, Vol.31, No.1, pp.136-151.
  5. Hardin, B. O. (1978), "The Nature of Stress-Strain Behavior of Soil", Proceedings, Geotech. Eng. Div. Specialty Conference on Earthquake Eng. and Soil Dynamics, Pasadena, CA, ASCE, Vol.1, pp.3-90.
  6. Hardin, B. O. and Black, W. L. (1968), "Vibration modulus of normally consolidated clay" Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations, ASCE, Vol.94, No.SM2, pp.353-369.
  7. Hardin, B. O. and Drnevich, V. P. (1972), "Shear Modulus and Damping in Soils : Design Equations and Curves" Journal of SMF Div., ASCE, Vol.98, No.SM7, pp.667-692.
  8. Hardin, B. O. and Richart, F. E. (l963), "Elastic Wave Velocities in Granular Soils" Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations, ASCE, Vo1.9, No.SM1, pp.33-65.
  9. Idriss, I. M. (1993), "Assessment of Site Response Analysis Procedure", Report No. NIST GCR 95-667, National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD, Center for Geotechnical Modelling, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, David.
  10. Ishihara, K. (1996), "Pore pressure generation characteristics of gravel under undrained cyclic loading", Ph.D. Dissertation, Unicersity of California, Berkeley.
  11. Iwasaki, T., Tatsuoka, F. and Takagi, T. (1978), "Shear Moduli of Sands under Cyclic Torsional Shear Loading", Soils and Foundations, Vol.18, No.1, pp.39-56. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.18.39
  12. JGS 0542-2000, "Method for Cyclic Triaxial Test to Determine Deformation Properties of Geomaterials", The Japanese Geotechnical Society.
  13. Kim, D. (1991), "Deformational characteristics of soils at small to intermediate strain from cyclic tests" Ph.D Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, US.
  14. Kim, D. S. (1995), "Deformational Characteristics of Dry Sand Using Resonant Column/Torsional Shear Testing", Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society(KGS), Vol.11, No.1, pp.101-112.
  15. Kim, D. S. and Choo, Y. W. (2004), "Cyclic Threshold Shear Strains of Sands Based on the Buildup of Pore Water Pressure and Variations of Deformation Characteristics", Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineering(KSCE), Vol.24, No.3, pp.193-203.
  16. Kim, J. M., Park, Y. H., and Lim, S D. (2009), "Dynamic Shear Properties of Nak-Dong River Sand Determined by Resonant Column/Torsional Shear Test", Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society(KGS), Vol.25, No.11, pp.5-15.
  17. Kokusho, T. (1980), "Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range" Soils and Foundations, Vol.20, No.2, pp.45-60.
  18. KSF 2345 (2010), Testing Method for Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, Testing Standard.
  19. Lee, S. J., Kim, Y. K., Choo, Y. W., Lee, S. H., and Kang, T. H. (2010), "Development and Verification of Large Triaxial Testing System for Dynamic Properties of Granular Materials", Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society(KGS), Vol.26, No.12. pp.5-17
  20. Lo Presti (1989), "Proprieta dinamiche dei terreni", Proc. 14th Conf. Geotech. Turin.
  21. Park, D. K. (2002), "A Suggestion of an Empirical Equation for Shear Modulus Reduction Curve Estimation of Sandy Soils", Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society(KGS), Vol.18, No.3, pp.127-138.
  22. Park, I. B., Park, C. S., and Mok, Y. J. (2009), "Verification of the Large Scale, Free-free Resonant Testing Equipment using Jumunjin Sand", International Symposium on Urban Geotechnics, pp.1415-1424.
  23. Port and Harbour Research Institute(PHRI) (1997), Handbook in Liquefaction Remediation of Reclaimed Land, A.A.Balkema, Rotterdam, Brookfield, pp.57-67.
  24. Ramberg, W. and Osgood, W. R. (1943), "Description of Stress- Strain Curves by the Three Parameters" Technical Note 902, National Advisory committee for Aeronautics, Washington, D.C.
  25. Rollins, K. M., Evans, M. D., Diehl, N. B. and Daily, W. D. (1998), "Shear modulus and damping relationships for gravels" Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol.124, No.5, pp.396-405. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:5(396)
  26. Seed, H. B. and Idriss, I. M. (1970), "Soil Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Response Analysis" Report No. EERC 70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Sept., pp.37.
  27. Seed, H. B., Wang, R. T., Idriss, I. M. and Tokimatsu, K. (1984), "Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Analysis of Cohesionless Soils" Report No. UCB/EERC-84/14, University of California, Berkeley
  28. Shibata, T. and Soelarno, D. S. (1975), "Stress-Strain Characteristics of Sands Under Cyclic Loading" Proc. JSCE, Vol.239, pp.57-65 (in Japanese).
  29. Stone, W. C., Yokel, F. Y., Celebi, M., Hanks, T., and Leyendecker, E. V. (1987), "Engineering aspects of the September 19, 1985 Mexico earthquake" NBS Building Science Series 165, National Bureau of Standard, Washington, D.C. pp.207.
  30. Vucetic, M and Dobry R. (1991), "Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response" Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol.117, No.1, pp.89-107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89)

Cited by

  1. Prediction of Change Rate of Settlement for Piled Raft Due to Adjacent Tunneling Using Machine Learning vol.11, pp.13, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136009
  2. Stability Analysis of Soil Flow Protector and Design Method for Estimating Optimal Length vol.11, pp.16, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167314