DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Pap Smear Screening Results between Akha Hill Tribe and Urban Women in Chiang Rai Province, Thailand

  • Kritpetcharat, Onanong (Department of Pathology, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Wutichouy, Wiwat (Chiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital, Chiand Rai Province) ;
  • Sirijaichingkul, Suchat (Department of Clinical Immunology, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Kritpetcharat, Panutas (Department of Clinical Microscopy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University)
  • Published : 2012.11.30

Abstract

Cervical cancer is an important woman's health problems worldwide, especially in low socio-economic countries. The aim of this study was to compare the Pap smear screening results between Akha hill tribe and urban women who live in Chiang Rai province, Thailand. Screening was conducted for 1,100 Akha women and 1,100 urban women who came to have the Pap smear at Chiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital and 1 private cytology laboratory from January to June 2008. The demographic characteristics and factors related to abnormal Pap smears of these women were gathered using closed model questionnaires. Abnormal Pap smears were defined according to the Bethesda 2001 system. The results showed that the prevalence of abnormal Pap smears was 12.2% in Akha women and 4.5% in urban women. The highest prevalence of Pap abnormalities was found in the 41-50 years age group in both populations (4.5% in Akha and 1.7% in urban women). In both populations, abnormal Pap smears were found in <21 years age groups. From the questionnaires, the possible risk factors related to the higher prevalence of abnormal Pap smears in Akha women were early age at marriage (${\leq}17$ years), high frequency pregnacies and high parity and no/low education level. In conclusion, cervical cancer control by education and early detection by Pap smear screening is necessary for hill tribe women. More Pap smear screening service units should be set to improve the coverage for the risk group women who got married in young age, especial in ethnic groups.

Keywords

References

  1. Aguettant JL (1996). Impact of population registration on hilltribe development in Thailand. Asia Pac Popul, 11, 47-72.
  2. Damiani G, Federico B, Basso D, et al (2012). Socioeconomic disparities in the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in Italy: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Hlth, 12, 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-99
  3. Idestrom M, Milsom I, Andersson-Ellstrom A (2002). Knowledge and attitudes about the Pap-smear screening program: a population-based study of women aged 20-59 years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 81, 962-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1600-0412.2002.811011.x
  4. Lonky NM (2002a). Risk factors related to the development and mortality from invasive cervical cancer clinical utility and impact on prevention. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 29, 817-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-8545(02)00021-9
  5. Lonky NM (2002b). Reducing death from cervical cancer examining the prevention paradigms. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 29, 599-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-8545(02)00020-7
  6. Morris M, Tortolero-Luna G, Malpica A (1996). Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 23, 347-410.
  7. Murthy NS, Mathew A (2000). Risk factors for pre-cancerous lesions of the cervix. Eur J Cancer Prev, 9, 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008469-200002000-00002
  8. Nkegoum B, Belley Priso E, Mbakop A, Gwent Bell E (2001). Precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix in cameroonian women. Cytological and epidemiological aspects of 946 cases. Gynecol Obstet Fertil, 29, 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1297-9589(00)00024-2
  9. Pereira CR, Rosa ML, Vasconcelos GA, et al (2007). Human papillomavirus prevalence and predictors for cervical cancer among high-risk women from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 17, 651-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00844.x
  10. Plummer M, Peto J, Franceschi S(2012). Time since first sexual intercourse and the risk of cervical cancer. Int J Cancer, 130, 2638-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.26250
  11. Sauvaget C, Nene BM, Jayant K, et al (2011). Prevalence and determinants of high-risk human papillomavirus infection in middle-aged Indian women. Sex Transm Dis, 38, 902-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318223be5f
  12. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al (2002). The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. Jama, 287, 2114-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.16.2114
  13. Thulaseedharan JV, Malila N, Hakama M, et al (2012). Socio demographic and reproductive risk factors for cervical cancer-a large prospective cohort study from rural India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 2991-5. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.6.2991
  14. Twinn S, Cheng F (1999). A case study of the effectiveness of nurse-led screening programmes for cervical cancer among Hong Kong Chinese women. J Adv Nurs, 29, 1089-96. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00991.x

Cited by

  1. Factors Affecting Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake by Hmong Hilltribe Women in Thailand vol.15, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.8.3753
  2. Association between Early Marriage and Other Sociomedical Characteristics with the Cervical Pap Smear Results in Iraqi Women vol.05, pp.04, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4236/asm.2015.54009
  3. Prevalence of Abnormal Papanicolaou Test Results and Related Factors among Women Living in Zanjan, Iran vol.16, pp.16, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.16.6935