DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perception of Community Family-Friendliness among Parents with Young Children in Urban and Rural Areas

도시화 규모에 따른 미취학자녀 부모의 지역사회 가족친화성 인식 : 대도시, 중소도시, 농어촌의 비교

  • Yoo, Jae-Eon (Dept. of Child Development and Family Studies.Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National Univ.) ;
  • Chin, Meejung (Dept. of Child Development and Family Studies.Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National Univ.)
  • 유재언 (서울대학교 생활과학대학 아동가족학과.생활과학연구소) ;
  • 진미정 (서울대학교 생활과학대학 아동가족학과.생활과학연구소)
  • Received : 2012.09.13
  • Accepted : 2012.11.16
  • Published : 2012.12.31

Abstract

This study aims to find the association between community scales and perceived community family-friendliness among parents with young children. Communities were identified into three groups: metropolitan, small and medium-sized cities and rural, according to the degree of urbanization. The data were drawn from a sample of 1,038 parents who had at least one pre-school child. The data were analyzed by frequencies, means, GIS, ANOVA, and multiple regressions. This study compared the level of community family-friendliness both at the 'dong' and 'si' levels after controlling for the individual and household characteristics of the respondents. The findings of this study are as follows. First, after controlling for individual and household factors, the level of perceived community family-friendliness differed by the community scales. The parents in the small and medium-sized cities had higher scores on community family-friendliness than their counterparts in metropolitan communities. And parents in rural communities received had lower scores in community family-friendliness than those in metropolitan communities. The results also showed similar patterns for the 'dong' and 'si' models. While job and housing type were associated with the perceived family-friendliness of the community, other characteristics such as sex, age, educational level, monthly household income and home ownership were not.

Keywords

References

  1. 강기정․박정윤․송원영․박경애․이은정(2010). 건강가정 지원센터 표준화모델 개발을 위한 기초연구 보고서. 중앙건강가정지원센터.
  2. 김선미․이기영․이승미․김은정․김소영․유재언(2010). 자녀양육 지원사업 개선방안 -아이돌보미 지원사업을 중심으로-. 여성가족부.
  3. 김선미․이승미․노영주․송혜림․조영희․김소영(2011). 지역 돌봄 기능 활성화 방안. 여성가족부.
  4. 김혜영․홍승아․이택연․선보영․진미정․홍성만(2009). 가족친화 사회환경 조성 실태조사. 보건복지부.
  5. 서문희․김은설․최진․안재진․최혜선․김유경․조애저 (2009). 2009년 전국보육실태조사 -가구조사 보고서. 보건복지가족부. 육아정책개발센터.
  6. 홍승아․김혜영․류연규(2007). 가족친화적 사회환경 구축 방안 연구-직장․지역사회의 모형개발을 중심으로-. 한국여성정책연구원.
  7. 홍승아․김혜영․류연규․相馬直直(상마직직)․조순주․ 진미정(2007). 가족친화적 지역사회 모형개발 연구. 한국여성정책연구원.
  8. Cha, S.(2010a). The role of institution for family-friendly community initiated by local people -The case study of livable community making projects-. Korean Family Resource Management Association, 14(4), 77-100.
  9. Cha, S.(2010b). A discussion of the family-friendly village model and important factors. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 28(2), 63-76.
  10. Cha, S.(2011). A study on the plan to reinforce the resident's capacity to build family-friendly community- focused on educational program of livable community building-. Korean Family Resource Management Association, 15(3), 23-42.
  11. Cha, S. & Lee, H.(2011). A study on preferences for apartment interiors, exteriors, and neighborhood environment for a family friendly community environment -Focused on apartment dwellers in Daejeon city-. Korean Family Resource Management Association, 15(2), 45-62.
  12. Claudia, J., Coulton, M., Zane, J. & Tsui C.(2012). How big is my neighborhood? Individual and contextual effects on perceptions of neighborhood scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, Published online 11 August, DOI 10.1007/s10464-012-9550-6 http://www.springerlink.com/content/40x94702q8057262/
  13. Gerard, D.(2010). Community(2nd Ed). London ; N.Y.: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  14. Jung, M.(2011). The relations of community capacity and healthy behavior among Seoul residents: A multi-level study of contextual effects using community capacity indicators. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul.
  15. Jung, M. & Cho, B.(2007). The influence of community capacity in health status. 보건과 사회과학, 22, 153-182.
  16. Jung, M. & Cho, B.(2011). A multi-level study of contextual effects of community capacity on health status among Seoul residents: focused on social quality. Journal of Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion, 28(4), 1-14.
  17. Jung, M. & Cho, B.(2012). The measurement of individual- level and community-level community capacity and their association with self-rated health status : A comparison of D-gu and Y-gu in Seoul. Journal of Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion, 29(1), 39-57.
  18. Jung, M., Gil, J. & Cho, B.(2009). The measurement of community capacity using community-based organizations network and the development of health promotion plans. Journal of Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion, 26(3), 35-48.
  19. Joo, J.(2012). A life course perspective on the elderly's lives in a renewed area : Exploring a changing community and its social capital. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul.
  20. Kim, S.(2011). A study focused on rural residents' experience of participating in a national pilot project to make a liable community. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul.
  21. Kim, S. & Kim, S.(2010). A study on the family-friendly community activity of the community library and the apartment house residents' representative committee. Korean Family Resource Management Association, 14(1), 73-96.
  22. Kim, S. & Lee, S.(2010). A qualitative case study focused on the national pilot project to make family-friendly communities. Korean Family Resource Management Association, 14(4), 101-126.
  23. Noh, S. & Chin, M.(2012). The influence of perceived family-friendliness of community on parenting efficacy and stress among parents with preschoolers. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 30(3), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.7466/JKHMA.2012.30.3.135
  24. Park, S.(2010). The influence of family-friendly life environment factors on the effect of multiple roles of married men/women with children : Focused on living environment satisfaction, family support facility satisfaction, family support program satisfaction, nurture and education environment satisfaction, and living environment information accessibility. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 28(5), 53-66.
  25. Park, S., Lee, W., Kim, H., & Ryu, J.(2009). 가족친화환경 조성을 위한 생활가로 연구. Family and Culture, 21(1), 151-174.
  26. Sampson, R, J.(2012). Great American city. Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago ; London: The university of chicago press.
  27. Sweet, S., Swisher, R. & Moen, P.(2005). Selecting and assessing the family-friendly community: Adaptive strategies of middle-class, dual-earner couples. Family Relations, 54, 596-606. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2005.00344.x
  28. Swisher, R., Sweet, S. & Moen, P.(2004). The familyfriendly community and its life course fit. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(2), 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00020.x
  29. Wolff, T.(2010). The power of collaborative solutions : six principles and effective tools for building healthy communities. San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass.
  30. Yoon, S.(2011). An ethnographic study of the meaning of life experiences of older people in rural communities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul.
  31. 국가통계포털. 인구총조사. 2010년. http://kosis.kr/index/index.jsp
  32. 국가통계포털. 가계동향조사. 2012년 2분기. http://kosis.kr/index/index.jsp
  33. 통계청. SGIS통계지리정보서비스. http://sgis.kostat.go.kr/

Cited by

  1. Child-Care Infrastructures and the Perception of Community Family-Friendliness : Parents with Young Children in 25 Provinces in Seoul vol.31, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7466/JKHMA.2013.31.3.063
  2. How Family, Work, and Community Resources Affect Family to Work Conflict and Facilitation of Employed Mothers vol.56, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2018.004
  3. A Conceptualization of Family Friendly Community from the Perspective of Family Policy vol.23, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13049/kfwa.2018.23.2.9