Effects of Caffeine on Maturation-Promoting Factor (MPF) Activity in Bovine Oocytes and on the Development of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Embryos in White-Hanwoo

  • Lee, Joon-Hee (Department of Animal Bioscience, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Hee-Gyu (Department of Animal Bioscience, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Baik, Sang-Ki (Department of Animal Bioscience, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jin, Sang-Jin (Department of Animal Bioscience, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Moon, Song-Yi (Department of Animal Bioscience, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Eun, Hye-Ju (Department of Animal Bioscience, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Suk (Department of Animal Bioscience, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Ko, Yeoung-Gyu (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Woo (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Park, Hae-Geum (Department of Animal Bioscience, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Park, Soo-Bong (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Received : 2012.11.22
  • Accepted : 2012.12.14
  • Published : 2012.12.31

Abstract

The technique of SCNT is now well established but still remains inefficient. The in vitro development of SCNT embryos is dependent upon numerous factors including the recipient cytoplast and karyoplast. Above all, the metaphase of the second meiotic division (MII) oocytes have typically become the recipient of choice. Generally high level of MPF present in MII oocytes induces the transferred nucleus to enter mitotic division precociously and causes NEBD and PCC, which may be the critical role for nuclear reprogramming. In the present study we investigated the in vitro development and pregnancy of White-Hanwoo SCNT embryos treated with caffeine (a protein kinase phosphatase inhibitor). As results, the treatment of 10 mM caffeine for 6 h significantly increased MPF activity in bovine oocytes but does not affect the developmental competence to the blastocyst stage in bovine SCNT embryos. However, a significant increase in the mean cell number of blastocysts and the frequency of pregnant on 150 days of White-Hanwoo SCNT embryos produced using caffeine treated cytoplasts was observed. These results indicated that the recipient cytoplast treated with caffeine for a short period prior to reconstruction of SCNT embryos is able to increase the frequency of pregnancy in cow.

Keywords

References

  1. Alberio R, Brero A, Motlik J, Cremer T, Wolf E, Zakhartchenko V (2001): Remodeling of donor nuclei, DNA-synthesis, and ploidy of bovine cumulus cell nuclear transfer embryos: effect of activation protocol. Molecular Reproduction and Development 59:371-379. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1043
  2. Campbell KHS, Alberio R (2003): Reprogramming the genome: role of the cell cycle. Reproduction Supplement 61:477-494.
  3. Campbell KHS, Ritchie WA, Wilmut I (1993): Nuclear- cytoplasmic interactions during the first cell cycle of nuclear transfer reconstructed bovine embryos: implications for deoxyribonucleic acid replication and development. Biology of Reproduction 49: 933-942. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod49.5.933
  4. Collas P, Balise JJ, Robl JM (1992): Influence of cell cycle stage of the donor nucleus on development of nuclear transplant rabbit embryos. Biology of Reproduction 46:492-500. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod46.3.492
  5. Holm P, Booth PJ, Callesen H (2003): Developmental kinetics of bovine nuclear transfer and parthenogenetic embryos. Cloning and Stem Cells 5:133-142. https://doi.org/10.1089/153623003322234731
  6. Kikuchi K, Naito K, Noguchi J, Shimada A, Kaneko H, Yamashita M, Aoki F, Tojo H, Toyoda Y (2000): Maturation/M-phase promoting factor: a regulator of aging in porcine oocytes. Biology of Reproduction 63:715-722. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod63.3.715
  7. Kurosaka S, Nagao Y, Minami N, Yamada M, Imai H (2002): Dependence of DNA synthesis and in vitro development of bovine nuclear transfer embryos on the stage of the cell cycle of donor cells and recipient cytoplasts. Biology of Reproduction 67:643-647. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod67.2.643
  8. Lee JH, Campbell KHS (2006): Effects of enucleation and caffeine on maturation-promoting factor (MPF) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activities in ovine oocytes used as recipient cytoplasts for nuclear transfer. Biology of Reproduction 74:691-698. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.105.043885
  9. Martinez-Balbas MA, Dey A, Rabindran SK, Ozato K, Wu C (1995): Displacement of sequence-specific transcription factors from mitotic chromatin. Cell 83:29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90231-7
  10. Motlik J, Alberio R, Zakhartchenko V, Stojkovic M, Kubelka M, Wolf E (2002): The effect of activation of mammalian oocytes on remodeling of donor nuclei after nuclear transfer. Cloning and Stem Cells 4:245-252. https://doi.org/10.1089/15362300260339520
  11. O'Keefe SJ, Kiessling AA, Cooper GM (1991): The c-mos gene product is required for cyclin B accumulation during meiosis of mouse eggs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 88:7869-7872. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.17.7869
  12. Petr J, Urbankova D, Tomanek M, Rozinek J, Jilek F (2002): Activation of in vitro matured pig oocytes using activators of inositol triphosphate or ryanodine receptors. Animal Reproduction Science 70:235-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00012-X
  13. Sagata N, Watanabe N, Vande W, Ikawa Y (1989): The c-mos proto-oncogene product is a cytostatic factor responsible for meiotic arrest in vertebrate eggs. Nature 342:512-518. https://doi.org/10.1038/342512a0
  14. Smith SD, Soloy E, Kanka J, Holm P, Callesen H (1996): Influence of recipient cytoplasm cell stage on transcription in bovine nucleus transfer embryos. Molecular Reproduction and Development 45:444-450. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199612)45:4<444::AID-MRD6>3.0.CO;2-R
  15. Viets LN, Campbell KD, White KL (2001): Pathways involved in RGD-mediated calcium transients in mature bovine oocytes. Cloning Stem Cells 3: 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1089/153623001753205061
  16. Wells DN, Misica PM, Tervit HR, Vivanco WH (1998): Adult somatic cell nuclear transfer is used to preserve the last surviving cow of the Enderby Island cattle breed. Reproduction Fertility and Development 10:369-378. https://doi.org/10.1071/R98109
  17. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KHS (1997): Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385:810-813. https://doi.org/10.1038/385810a0
  18. Wrenzycki C, Wells D, Herrmann D, Miller A, Oliver J, Tervit R, Niemann H (2001): Nuclear transfer protocol affects messenger RNA expression patterns in cloned bovine blastocysts. Biology of Reproduction 65:309-317. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod65.1.309