Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research (임상간호연구)

Hospital Nurses Association (병원간호사회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Prioritizing for the Evidence-Based Nursing Practice Guidelines Development

국내 근거기반 임상간호실무지침 주제의 우선순위 결정

  • Gu, Mee Ock (College of Nursing, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Cho, Myoung Sook (Samsung Medical Center, Department of Clinical Nursing Science, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Yong Ae (Department of Nursing Staff Development, Samsung Medical Center, Graduate School of Clinical Nursing Science, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Jeong, Jae Sim (Department of Clinical Nursing, University of Ulsan) ;
  • Eun, Young (College of Nursing, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jeong, Ihn Sook (College of Nursing, Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Jeong Sook (Division of Nursing, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System) ;
  • Kim, Hea Jeong (Nursing Department, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital)
  • 구미옥 (경상대학교 간호대학, 경상대학교 건강과학연구원) ;
  • 조명숙 (삼성서울병원 간호본부, 성균관대학교 의과대학 임상간호학교실) ;
  • 조용애 (삼성서울병원 간호교육, 성균관대학교 의과대학 임상간호학교실 임상부) ;
  • 정재심 (울산대학교 임상전문간호학) ;
  • 은영 (경상대학교 간호대학, 경상대학교 건강과학연구원) ;
  • 정인숙 (부산대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 박정숙 (세브란스병원 간호팀) ;
  • 김혜정 (가톨릭대학교 서울성모병원 간호팀)
  • Received : 2012.01.09
  • Accepted : 2012.02.29
  • Published : 2012.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Thisstudy was conducted with an aim to get a kind of prioritiesin developing the evidence-based nursing practice guidelines in fields. Methods: This study utilized a two-round Delphi surveys from November to December, 2010 with self-administered questionnaires which had a scale ranged from 0 to 9. A total of 95 head nurses working at the forty different general hospitals was asked to evaluate the priorities in four criteria; patient coverage, certainty, improvement in patient outcome and in nursing practice (first round) and 65 head nurses were asked to decide the importance of the criteria afterwards (second round). Results: The relative importance of 4 criteria was 22.3% in patient coverage, 26.5% in certainty, 23.5% in improvement of patient outcome, and 27.7% in improvement of nursing practice as the results of the 1st round and 20.6%, 26.6%, 24.8%, and 28.0% for the 2nd round, respectively. Top five nursing practices showed high scores after considering the relative importances of the 4 criteria were medication, intravenous therapy, checking vital sign, pain management, and diagnostic test or procedures care. Conclusion: It is recommended to take into account of the priorities that were found in this study when someone intends to develop a evidence-based nursing practice guideline.

Keywords