DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Two Point Discrimination, Hand Function, and ADL in Impaired Characteristics of Stroke Patient

뇌졸중 환자의 장애 특성에 따른 접촉 감각 자극이 두점 구별, 손 기능 및 일상생활수행력에 미치는 효과

  • Song, Bo-Kyung (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Adult Rehabilitation Center, Bobath Memorial Hospital)
  • 송보경 (보바스기념병원 성인재활센터 작업치료실)
  • Received : 2012.09.05
  • Accepted : 2012.10.15
  • Published : 2012.11.30

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study find out the effect of improved two point discrimination (TPD), hand function and activities of daily living (ADL) performance through tactile stimulus of upper limb (U/L) in impaired characteristics of stroke METHODS: We selected 26 stroke patients in BMH who has problems with neglect, sensory and motor deficits. Patients were divided into 3 group with neglect group (NG), sensorimotor deficits group (SMG) and motor deficit group (MG). To compare each group we used assessment tools such as two point discrimination on affected side (TPDas) and unaffected side (TPDus), Manual functional test on affected side (MFTas) and unaffected side (MFTus) and Korean version modified barthel index (K-MBI). RESULTS: 1) In the NG, tactile stimulus on U/L was statistically important for TPDas (forearm, index finger tip) also SMG and MDG was statistically important for TPDas. 2) In the NG, SMG, there was statistically important for MFTas, MFTus and in the MG. K-MBI also was statistically importance. Among three group, there was an statistically important difference for TPTus (forearm, thenar, hypothenar), MFTas and MFTus. We analyzed the relationship among TPD, MFT and K-MBI and There was negative relationship between TPD, MFT and There was positive relationship between TPD and K-MBI CONCLUSION: In impaired characteristics of stroke patients, tactile stimulus on U/L influenced on two point discrimination, hand function and ADL's. And we also found relationship among somatosensory, hand function, and ADL performance.

Keywords

References

  1. Alain L, Helene P & Sylvie N. Task-oriented intervention in chronic stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85(10): 820-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000233179.64769.8c
  2. Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP et al. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci.2007;25(2):123-9.
  3. Cirstea MC & Levin MF. Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain. 2000;123(5):940-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.5.940
  4. Dombovy ML, Sandok BA & Basford JR. Rehabilitation for stroke: a review. Stroke. 1986;17(3):363-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.17.3.363
  5. Filiatrault J, Arsenault AB, Dutil E et al. Motor function and activities of daily living assessments: a study of three tests for persons with hemiplegia. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;.45(9):806-10. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.45.9.806
  6. Haines I & Duane E. Fundamental neuroscience for basic and clinical applications. 3rd ed. Philadelpia. Churchill Livingstone. 2006.
  7. Johannsen L, Broetz D & Karnath HO. Leg orientation as a clinical sign for pusher syndrome. BMC Neurol. 2006;6(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-6-30
  8. Julkuken L, Tenvno O, Jaaskelainen SK et al. Recovery of somatosensory deficits in acute stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2005;111(6):366-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00393.x
  9. Jung HY, Park BK, Shin HS et al. Development of the korean version of modified barthel index (K-MBI): multicenter study for subjects with stroke. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2007;31(3):283-97.
  10. Kim MY. A study of manual functional test for C.V.A. The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy. 1994;2(1):19-26.
  11. Kotila M, Waltimo O, Niemi M et al. The profile of recovery from stroke and factors influencing outcome. Stroke. 1984;15(6):1039-44. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.15.6.1039
  12. Lee TY & Kim JW. Factor analysis of elemets affecting activities of daily living in stroke patients. The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy. 1994;2(1):19-26.
  13. Lin JH, Hsueh IP, Sheu CF et al. Psychometric properties of the sensory scale of the fugl-meyer assessment in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(4):391-7. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr737oa
  14. Matjacic Z, Hesse S & Sinkjaer T. Balance retrainer: a new standing-balance training apparatus and methods applied to a chronic hemiparetic subject with a neglect syndrom. Neuro Rehabilitation. 2003;18(3):251-9.
  15. Miyamoto S, Kondo T, Suzukamo Y et al. Reliability and validity of the manual function test in patients with stroke. Am J Phys Med. 2009;88(3):247-55. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181951133
  16. Nakamara H, Jorgenson HS, Raaschou HO et al. Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the copenhagen study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(10):852-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9993(94)90108-2
  17. Olson E, Stark M & Chatterjee A. Evidence for a unimodal somatosensory attention system. Exp Brai Res. 2003;151(1):15-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1428-2
  18. Pastor MA, Macaluso E, Day BL et al. The neural basis of temporal auditory discrimination. Neuroimage. 2006;30(2):512-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.053
  19. Pedretti LW & Early MB. Occupational therapy practice skills for physical dysfunction 5th ed. St Louis Mosby. 2001.
  20. Shah S & Muncer S. Sensitivity of shah, vanclay and cooper's modified barthel index. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14(5):551-2. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215500cr360oa
  21. Shah S, Vanclay F & Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the barthel index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(8):703-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6
  22. Shumway-Cook A & Woollacott MH. Motor control translating research into clinical practice. 3rd ed. Baltimore. Lippincott William & Wilkins. 2007.
  23. Sim HS. One year follow up study of the MMSE-K in the elderly. Korea Univeristy Graduate School. Master's thesis. 1998.
  24. Smania N, Montagnana B, Faccioli S et al. Rehabilitation of somatic sensation and related deficit of motor control in patients with pure sensory stoke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(11):692-702.
  25. Smith A. Beware of the barthel. Physiotherapy. 1993;79(12):12-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(10)60532-9
  26. Tamura Y, Hoshiyama M, Inui K et al. Central mechanisms for two-point discrimination in humans. Neurosci Lett. 2003;342(3):187-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00291-X
  27. Winward CE, Halligan PW & Wade DT. The rivermead assessment of somatosensory performmance (RASP): standardization and reliability data. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(5):523-33. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215502cr522oa
  28. Yekutiel M & Guttman E. A controlled trial of the retraining of the sensory function of the hand in stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993;56(3):241-4. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.56.3.241

Cited by

  1. Comparisons of changes in the two-point discrimination test following muscle fatigue in healthy adults vol.27, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.551
  2. 뇌졸중 환자의 초기 접지기를 강조한 청각적-피드백 보행훈련이 균형능력과 보행기능에 미치는 영향 vol.10, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2015.10.4.49
  3. 고유수용성 신경근 촉진법과 호흡근 지구력 훈련이 만성 뇌졸중 환자의 폐 기능과 신체활동량에 미치는 영향 vol.18, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.21598/jkpnfa.2020.18.2.205
  4. 지지면에 따른 마비 측 한 발 서기 훈련이 만성 편마비 환자의 보행속도와 균형에 미치는 효과 vol.8, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15268/ksim.2020.8.3.143