Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (아시아태평양암예방학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Satisfaction in the National Cancer Screening Program for Breast Cancer with and without Clinical Breast Examination

  • Han, Mi-Ah (Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Chosun University) ;
  • Jun, Jae-Kwan (National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Choi, Kui-Son (National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Park, Eun-Cheol (Department of Preventive Medicine & Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Hoo-Yeon (Department of Social Medicine, Dankook University, College of Medicine)
  • Published : 2012.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether screening by clinical breast examination (CBE) in addition to mammography affected participant satisfaction in the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP). Data were derived from the Quality Evaluation of National Cancer Screening satisfaction survey. This population-based nationwide telephone survey included participants who had been screened by the NCSP for breast cancer between June and August 2010 (n=2,370), and collected information on satisfaction with screening and screening service use. Five multiple regression models were used to determine satisfaction according to screening method, and according to each of five satisfaction measures (pre-screening information transfer, staff interpersonal skills, physical surroundings, reporting of results and general satisfaction). A total of 1,858 (78.4%) participants were screened by mammography alone and 512 (21.6%) by both mammography and CBE. Satisfaction was significantly higher in subjects screened by both mammography and CBE compared with those screened by mammography alone.

Keywords

References

  1. Almog R, Hagoel L, Tamir A, et al (2008). Quality control in a National Program for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer: women's satisfaction with the mammography process. Womens Health Issues, 18, 110-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2007.12.007
  2. Australian Government Department of Health and Aging The National Program for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer (BreastScreen Australia). http://www.cancerscreening. gov.au/internet/screening/publishing.nsf/Content/ breastscreen-about.
  3. Baier M, Calonge N, Cutter G, et al (2000). Validity of selfreported colorectal cancer screening behavior. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 9, 229-32.
  4. Calonge N, Petitti D, DeWitt T, et al (2009). Screening for breast cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med, 151, W236-W716.
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP). http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/nbccedp/index. htm.
  6. Cockburn J, Hill D, Luise T, et al(1993). Satisfaction of attenders during the establishment of an Australian mammography screening program. Aust J Public Health, 17, 103-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.1993.tb00116.x
  7. Day NB (2008). The need for performance and standardization of the best clinical breast exam. J Nurse Pract, 4, 342-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2007.10.008
  8. Decker KM, Harrison M, Tate RB (1999). Satisfaction of women attending the Manitoba Breast Screening Program. Prev Med, 29, 22-7. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1999.0497
  9. Dibble SL, Israel J, Nussey B, et al(2005). Mammography with breast cushions. Womens Health Issues, 15, 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2004.12.001
  10. Domar AD, Eyvazzadeh A, Allen S, et al (2005). Relaxation techniques for reducing pain and anxiety during screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 184, 445. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840445
  11. Doyle C, Stanton M (2002). Significant factors in patient satisfaction ratings of screening mammography. Radiography, 8, 159-72. https://doi.org/10.1053/radi.2002.0379
  12. Dullum JR, Lewis EC, Mayer JA (2000). Rates and correlates of discomfort associated with mammography. Radiology, 214, 547. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.214.2.r00fe23547
  13. Engelman KK, Ellerbeck EF, Mayo MS, et al (2004). Mammography facility characteristics and repeat mammography use among Medicare beneficiaries. Prev Med, 39, 491-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.05.020
  14. Esch BM, Marian F, Busato A, et al. (2008). Patient satisfaction with primary care: an observational study comparing anthroposophic and conventional care. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 6, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-1
  15. Etzi S, Lane DS, Grimson R (1994). The use of mammography vans by low-income women: the accuracy of self-reports. Am J Public Health, 84, 107-9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.84.1.107
  16. Evaluation Indicators Working Group. (2007). Report from the evaluation indicators working group: Guidelines for monitoring breast screening program performancesecond edition. Public Health Agency of Canada. http:// www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/2007/gmbspp-ldsppdcs/ index-eng.php.
  17. Klabunde C, Bouchard F, Taplin S, et al(2001). Quality assurance for screening mammography: an international comparison. J Epidemiol Community Health, 55, 204. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.55.3.204
  18. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002). Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology, 225, 165-75. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2251011667
  19. Lambertz CK, Johnson CJ, Montgomery PG, et al. (2008). Premedication to reduce discomfort during screening mammography. Radiology, 248, 765. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2482071490
  20. Lerman C, Rimer B, Trock B, et al (1990). Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Prev Med, 19, 279-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(90)90028-I
  21. Lim SM, Lee HY, Choi KS, et al(2010). Trends of mammography use in a National Breast Cancer Screening Program, 2004-2008. Cancer Res Treat, 42, 199. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2010.42.4.199
  22. Maskarinec G, Meng L, Ursin G (2001). Ethnic differences in mammographic densities. Int J Epidemiol, 30, 959. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/30.5.959
  23. Moore MA, Sobue T (2009). Cancer research and control activities in Japan: contributions to international efforts. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 10, 183-200.
  24. National Screening Unit Breast Screen Aotearoa. http://www. nsu.govt.nz/index.asp.
  25. NHS Cancer Screening Programes (2008). Breast and cervical screening: The first 20 years. http://www.cancerscreening. nhs.uk/nhscsp-20years.pdf.
  26. Public Health Agency of Canada Organized Breast Cancer Screening Programs in Canada-Report on program performance in 2003 and 2004. http://www.phac-aspc. gc.ca/publicat/2008/obcsp-podcs-03-04/index-eng.php.
  27. Shrestha S, Poulos A (2001). The effect of verbal information on the experience of discomfort in mammography. Radiography, 7, 271-7. https://doi.org/10.1053/radi.2001.0344
  28. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ (2006). American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin, 56, 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.56.1.11
  29. Yoo KY (2008). Cancer control activities in the Republic of Korea. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 38, 327. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyn026
  30. Yoon NH, Lee HY, Kwak MS, et al (2009). Comparison of satisfaction with cancer screening at mobile van and static sites: National Cancer Screening Program in Korea. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 39, 169. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyn156

Cited by

  1. The National Cancer Screening Program for Breast Cancer in the Republic of Korea: Is it Cost-Effective? vol.14, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.3.2059
  2. Cost-Effectiveness of Korea's National Cervical Cancer Screening Program vol.14, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.7.4329
  3. Satisfaction, discomfort, obligations, and concerns in population-based breast cancer screening: cross-sectional study in a Danish population vol.17, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2438-2