DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Identification of Genetic and Non-genetic Risk Factors for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in a Southeast Asian Population

  • Hashim, Nikman Adli Nor (Molecular Research and Services Laboratory, INFOVALLEY(R) Life Sciences Sdn. Mines Resort City) ;
  • Ramzi, Nurul Hanis (Molecular Research and Services Laboratory, INFOVALLEY(R) Life Sciences Sdn. Mines Resort City) ;
  • Velapasamy, Sharmila (Molecular Research and Services Laboratory, INFOVALLEY(R) Life Sciences Sdn. Mines Resort City) ;
  • Alex, Livy (Molecular Research and Services Laboratory, INFOVALLEY(R) Life Sciences Sdn. Mines Resort City) ;
  • Chahil, Jagdish Kaur (Molecular Research and Services Laboratory, INFOVALLEY(R) Life Sciences Sdn. Mines Resort City) ;
  • Lye, Say Hean (Molecular Research and Services Laboratory, INFOVALLEY(R) Life Sciences Sdn. Mines Resort City) ;
  • Munretnam, Khamsigan (Molecular Research and Services Laboratory, INFOVALLEY(R) Life Sciences Sdn. Mines Resort City) ;
  • Haron, Mohd Roslan (Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Hospital Sultan Ismail) ;
  • Ler, Lian Wee (Molecular Research and Services Laboratory, INFOVALLEY(R) Life Sciences Sdn. Mines Resort City)
  • Published : 2012.12.31

Abstract

Background: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is endemic in Southern Chinese and Southeast Asian populations. Geographical and ethnic clustering of the cancer is due to genetic, environmental, and lifestyle risk factors. This case-control study aimed to identify or confirm both genetic and non-genetic risk factors for NPC in one of the endemic countries, Malaysia. Materials and Methods: A panel of 768 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously associated with various cancers and known non-genetic risk factors for NPC were selected and analyzed for their associations with NPC in a case-control study. Results: Statistical analysis identified 40 SNPs associated with NPC risk in our population, including 5 documented previously by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and other case-control studies; the associations of the remaining 35 SNPs with NPC were novel. In addition, consistent with previous studies, exposure to occupational hazards, overconsumption of salt-cured foods, red meat, as well as low intake of fruits and vegetables were also associated with NPC risk. Conclusions: In short, this study confirmed and/or identified genetic, environmental and dietary risk factors associated with NPC susceptibility in a Southeast Asian population.

Keywords

References

  1. Armstrong RW, Armstrong MJ, Yu MC, Henderson BE (1983). Salted fish and inhalants as risk factors for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Malaysian Chinese. Cancer Res, 43, 2967-70
  2. Armstrong RW, Imrey PB, Lye MS, et al (2000). Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Malaysian Chinese: occupational exposures to particles, formaldehyde and heat. Int J Epidemiol, 29, 991-8 https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/29.6.991
  3. Bei JX, Li Y, Jia WH, et al (2010). A genome-wide association study of nasopharyngeal carcinoma identifies three new susceptibility loci. Nat Genet, 42, 599-603. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.601
  4. Bosch DJ, Pultrum BB, de Bock GH, et al (2011). Comparison of different risk-adjustment models in assessing short-term surgical outcome after transthoracic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. Am J Surg, 202, 303-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.04.003
  5. Carter KW, McCaskie PA, Palmer LJ (2006). JLIN: a java based linkage disequilibrium plotter. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-60
  6. Chang ET, Adami H-O (2006). The Enigmatic Epidemiology of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prev, 15, 1765-77. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0353
  7. Clifford P (1970). A review on the epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Int Du Cancer, 5, 287-309. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910050302
  8. Di Bernardo MC, Crowther-Swanepoel D, Broderick P, et al (2008). A genome-wide association study identifies six susceptibility loci for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat Genet, 40, 1204-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.219
  9. Eastham JA, May R, Robertson JL, Sartor O, Kattan MW (1999). Development of a nomogram that predicts the probability of a positive prostate biopsy in men with an abnormal digital rectal examination and a prostate-specific antigen between 0 and 4 ng/mL. Urology, 54, 709-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00213-7
  10. Ekburanawat W, Ekpanyaskul C, Brennan P, et al (2010). Evaluation of non-viral risk factors for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Thailand: results from a case-control study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 11, 929-32.
  11. Hartge P, Whittemore AS, Itnyre J, McGowan L, Cramer D (1994). Rates and risks of ovarian cancer in subgroups of white women in the United States. The collaborative ovarian cancer group. Obstetrics Gynecol, 84, 760-4.
  12. Hindorff LA, MacArthur J, Wise A, et al (2011). A Catalog of Published Genome-Wide Association Studies.
  13. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, et al (2003). Using risk for advanced proximal colonic neoplasia to tailor endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Internal Med, 139, 959-65. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-139-12-200312160-00005
  14. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al (2011). Global cancer statistics. CA: A Cancer J Clinicians, 61, 69-90. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20107
  15. Jiang SQ, Liu Q (2009). Application of logistic regression in combination with multiple diagnostic tests for auxiliary diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chinese J Cancer, 28, 177-80.
  16. Jin Y, Cai XY, Cai YC, et al (2012). To build a prognostic score model containing indispensible tumour markers for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in an epidemic area. Eur J Cancer, 48, 882-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.09.004
  17. Landi MT, Chatterjee N, Yu K, et al (2009). A genome-wide association study of lung cancer identifies a region of chromosome 5p15 associated with risk for adenocarcinoma. Am J Hum Genet, 85, 679-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.09.012
  18. Lerman J (1996). Study design in clinical research: sample size estimation and power analysis. Canadian journal of anaesthesia. J Canadien d'anesthesie, 43, 184-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03011261
  19. Lu C-C, Chen J-C, Jin Y-T, et al (2003). Genetic susceptibility to nasopharyngeal carcinoma within the HLA-A locus in Taiwanese. Int J Cancer, 103, 745-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.10861
  20. Lu C-C, Chen J-C, Tsai S-T, et al (2005). Nasopharyngeal carcinoma-susceptibility locus is localized to a 132 kb segment containing HLA-A using high-resolution microsatellite mapping. Int J Cancer, 115, 742-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.20946
  21. Ng CC, Yew PY, Puah SM, et al (2009). A genome-wide association study identifies ITGA9 conferring risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Hum Genet, 54, 392-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/jhg.2009.49
  22. Peng B, Li B, Han Y, Amos CI (2010). Power analysis for casecontrol association studies of samples with known family histories. Human Genetics, 127, 699-704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-010-0824-5
  23. Rockhill B, Spiegelman D, Byrne C, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA (2001). Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention. J Nat Cancer Inst, 93, 358-66 https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/93.5.358
  24. Selvachandran SN, Hodder RJ, Ballal MS, Jones P, Cade D (2002). Prediction of colorectal cancer by a patient consultation questionnaire and scoring system: a prospective study. Lancet, 360, 278-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09549-1
  25. Serraino D, Piselli P, Angeletti C, et al (2005). Infection with Epstein-Barr virus and cancer: an epidemiological review. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents, 19, 63-70
  26. Spitz MR, Hong WK, Amos CI, et al (2007). A risk model for prediction of lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 99, 715-26. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djk153
  27. Taplin SH, Thompson RS, Schnitzer F, Anderman C, Immanuel V (1990). Revisions in the risk-based breast cancer screening program at group health cooperative. Cancer, 66, 812-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19900815)66:4<812::AID-CNCR2820660436>3.0.CO;2-1
  28. Teo YY, Sim X, Ong RT, et al (2009). Singapore genome variation project: a haplotype map of three Southeast Asian populations. Genome Res, 19, 2154-62. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.095000.109
  29. Tice JA, Cummings SR, Ziv E, Kerlikowske K (2005). Mammographic breast density and the Gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 94, 115-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-005-5152-4
  30. Tse K-P, Su W-H, Chang K-P, et al (2009). Genome-wide association study reveals multiple nasopharyngeal carcinoma-associated loci within the HLA region at chromosome 6p21.3. Am J Human Genetics, 85, 194-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.07.007
  31. Vokes EE, Liebowitz DN, Weichselbaum RR (1997). Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet, 350, 1087-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)07269-3
  32. Whelan SL, Ferlay J (1992). Cancer incidence in five continents. Age-specific and standardized incidence rates. IARC Scientific Publications, 120, 178-861
  33. Wijnen JT, Vasen HFA, Khan PM, et al (1998). Clinical findings with implications for genetic testing in families with clustering of colorectal cancer. New Engl J Med, 339, 511-8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199808203390804
  34. Yoshizaki T, Ito M, Murono S, et al (2012). Current understanding and management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Auris Nasus Larynx, 39, 137-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2011.02.012
  35. Yu MC, Ho JHC, Lai S-H, Henderson BE (1986). Cantonesestyle salted fish as a cause of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: report of a case-control study in Hong Kong. Cancer Res, 46, 956-61.
  36. Yu MC, Mo C-C, Chong W-X, Yeh F-S, Henderson BE (1988). Preserved foods and nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a casecontrol study in Guangxi, China. Cancer Res, 48, 1954-9.
  37. Yu MC, Yuan JM (2002) Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Sem Cancer Biol, 12, 421-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044579X02000858
  38. Yuan J-M, Wang X-L, Xiang Y-B, et al (2000). Preserved foods in relation to risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Shanghai, China. Int J Cancer, 85, 358-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000201)85:3<358::AID-IJC11>3.0.CO;2-E
  39. Zainal AO, Zainudin MA, Nor Saleha IT (2006). Malaysia Cancer Statistics - Data and Figure Peninsular Malaysia 2006. National Cancer Registry, Ministry of Health Malaysia
  40. Zhang XS, Wang HH, Hu LF, et al (2004). V-val subtype of Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 preferentially exists in biopsies of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Letters, 211, 11-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2004.01.035
  41. Zheng W, Long J, Gao YT, et al (2009). Genome-wide association study identifies a new breast cancer susceptibility locus at 6q25.1. Nat Genet, 41, 324-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.318
  42. Zheng YM, Tuppin P, Hubert A, et al (1994). Environmental and dietary risk factors for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a case-control study in Zangwu County, Guangxi, China. Br J Cancer, 69, 508-14. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1994.92

Cited by

  1. ABO Blood Group, Epstein-Barr virus Infection and Prognosis of Patients with Non-metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma vol.15, pp.17, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.17.7459
  2. Nuclear Anomalies, Chromosomal Aberrations and Proliferation Rates in Cultured Lymphocytes of Head and Neck Cancer Patients vol.15, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.3.1119
  3. Distribution and Haplotype Associations of XPD Lys751Gln, XRCC1 Arg280His and XRCC1 Arg399Gln Polymorphisms with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Malaysian Population vol.15, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.6.2747
  4. Evaluation of Risk Factors for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in a High-risk Area of India, the Northeastern Region vol.16, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.12.4927
  5. Knowledge and Beliefs of Malaysian Adolescents Regarding Cancer vol.16, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.3.1097
  6. Downregulation of miR-429 and inhibition of cell migration and invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma vol.13, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.4940