The Effects of Calcinated Calcium Solution Washing and Heat Treatment on the Storage Quality and Microbial Growth of Fresh-cut Broccoli

신선편이 브로콜리의 품질과 미생물 성장에 영향을 주는 소성칼슘 용액 세척 및 열처리 효과

  • Kim, Ji Gang (Vegatable Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science) ;
  • Nimitkeatkai, Hataitip (Department of Agriculture to School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Phayao) ;
  • Choi, Ji Woen (Vegatable Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science) ;
  • Lee, Sang Gyu (Vegatable Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science)
  • 김지강 (국립원예특작과학원 채소과) ;
  • ;
  • 최지원 (국립원예특작과학원 채소과) ;
  • 이상규 (국립원예특작과학원 채소과)
  • Received : 2012.10.11
  • Accepted : 2012.12.06
  • Published : 2012.12.31

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of calcinated calcium (CC) alone or combination with heat treatment on storage quality and microbial growth in fresh-cut broccoli. Fresh broccoli samples were cut into small pieces and washed in normal tap water (TW), $50{\mu}L{\cdot}L^{-1}$ chlorinated water (pH 6.5), $1.5g{\cdot}L^{-1}$ CC, heat treatment in TW at $45^{\circ}C$, and CC dissolved in TW at $45^{\circ}C$ for 2 minutes separately. Samples were then packaged in $50{\mu}m$ polyethylene bags and stored at $5^{\circ}C$. Results revealed that like $50{\mu}L{\cdot}L^{-1}$ chlorine, washing in CC at normal water temperature was effective in reducing microbial population in fresh-cut broccoli samples. Washing with CC combined with heat treatment increased an electrical conductivity of fresh-cut broccoli. Combined heat treatments with TW and CC reduced aerobic plate count on fresh-cut broccoli, only in initial period of storage. But, later on heat treatment induced injury of fresh-cut broccoli resulting more microbial population compared to non heat treatment. However, samples treated with CC alone had good quality with low off-odor at the end of storage. Results suggest that CC, an environment-friendly sanitizer could be an alternative to chlorinated water for washing of fresh-cut broccoli without affecting sensorial quality.

환경친화적인 농산물 살균소독 세척방법으로 소성칼슘 및 열처리에 의한 신선편이 브로콜리 저장 중 품질 및 미생물적인 안전성 향상 효과를 구명하기 위하여 본 연구를 수행하였다. 브로콜리를 절단한 뒤 수돗물, $50{\mu}L{\cdot}L^{-1}$ 염소수 및 $1.5g{\cdot}L^{-1}$ 소성칼슘 용액과 $45^{\circ}C$의 수돗물 열처리, 열처리와 살균소독제를 혼합한 $45^{\circ}C$$1.5g{\cdot}L^{-1}$ 소성칼슘 용액에서 각각 2분 세척하였다. 그리고 신선편이 브로콜리를 $50{\mu}m$ PE 필름에 포장하여 $5^{\circ}C$에서 9일 저장하면서 기체조성, 전기전도도, 미생물수, 색 및 관능적인 품질을 조사하였다. 포장내부의 기체조성은 열처리에서 $O_2$ 농도가 낮고, $CO_2$ 농도는 높았으나 비열처리구에서는 살균소독 방법 간에 차이가 없었다. 소성칼슘 및 염소수 살균소독처리는 수돗물 처리보다 신선편이 브로콜리의 미생물 감소에 효과적이었고 열처리는 저장 3일까지는 효과가 있었으나 6일 이후에는 나타나지 않았다. 전기전도도는 소성칼슘 + 열처리에서 높게 나타났고, 색은 저장기간이 지나면서 명도가 낮아지고 황색도는 증가하였으나 살균소독 처리간에는 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 신선편이 브로콜리 저장 중 미생물수는 소성칼슘 단독처리가 염소수와 비슷한 수준으로 저장 9일 동안 일반세균수 제어효과를 나타냈고, 대장균군도 수돗물 처리보다 저장기간 내내 적게 나타났다. 또한 브로콜리 절단면의 변색 억제에는 열처리가 효과적이었으나 이취는 높게 나타났으며, 비열처리구에서 소성칼슘 용액처리는 염소수와 같이 수돗물보다 외관이 우수하고, 이취가 적게 나타났다. 따라서 소성칼슘 처리는 환경친화적인 방법으로서 신선편이 브로콜리의 염소 살균소독 세척을 대체할 수 있는 방법으로 판단되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ansorena, M.R., N.E. Marcovich, and S.I. Roura. 2011. Impact of edible coatings and mild heat shocks on quality of minimally processed broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.) during refrigerated storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 59:53-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.08.011
  2. Cameron, A.C., P.C. Talasila, and D.W. Joles. 1995. Predicting film permeability needs for modified atmosphere packaging of lightly processed fruits and vegetables. HortScience 30:25-34.
  3. Choi, J.W., W.M. Lee, J.H. Kwak, W.B. Kim, J.G. Kim, S.K. Lee, and M.A. Cho. 2011. Recent research status of postharvest management of broccoli. Korean J. Intl. Agri. 23:497-502 (in Korean).
  4. Das, B.K. and J.G. Kim. 2010. Microbial quality and safety of fresh-cut broccoli with different sanitizers and contact times. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 20: 363-369.
  5. Das, B.K., J.G. Kim, and J.W. Choi. 2011. Edge browning and microbial quality of fresh-cut Iceberg lettuce with different sanitizers and contact times. Bulgarian J. Agri. Sci. 17:55-62.
  6. Encarna, A, H.E. Victor, and A. Francisco. 2008. Effect of hot water treatment and various calcium salts on quality of fresh-cut 'Amarillo' melon, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 47:397-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.08.001
  7. Fallik, E. 2004. Prestorage hot water treatments (immersion, rinsing and brushing) Postharvest Biol. Technol. 32:125-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2003.10.005
  8. Gandhi, M. and K.R. Matthews. 2003. Efficacy of chlorine and calcinated calcium treatments of alfalfa seeds and sprouts to eliminate Salmonella. Intl. J. Food Microbiol. 87:301-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00108-9
  9. Izumi, H. 2007. Current status of the fresh-cut produce industry and sanitizing technology in Japan. Acta Hort. 746:45-52
  10. Jacxsens, L., F. Devlieghere, P. Ragaert, E. Vanneste, and J. Debevere. 2003. Relation between microbiological quality, metabolite production and sensory quality of equilibrium modified atmosphere packaged freshcut produce. Intl J. Food Microbiol. 83:263-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00376-8
  11. Jiang, Y., T. Shina, N. Nakamura, and A. Nakahara. 2001. Electrical conductivity evaluation of postharvest strawberry damage. J. Food Sci. 66:1392-1395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb15220.x
  12. Kim, J.G. 2007. Fresh-cut produce industry and quality management. Semyeong Press, Suwon, Korea (in Korean).
  13. Kim, J.G. 2012. Environmental friendly sanitation to improve quality and microbial safety of fresh-cut vegetables, p. 173-196. In: Biotechnology-molecular studies and novel applications for improved quality of human life. Intech, Croatia.
  14. Kim, J.G., H. Nimitkeatkai, J.W. Choi, and S.R. Cheong. 2011. Calcinated calcium and mild heat treatment on storage quality and microbial reduction of fresh-cut iceberg lettuce. Hort. Environ. Biotechnol. 52:408-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-011-0159-8
  15. Kim, J.G., Y. Luo, R.A. Saftner, and K.C. Gross. 2005. Delayed modified atmosphere packaging of fresh-cut Romaine lettuce: Effects on quality maintenance and shelf-life. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 130:116-123.
  16. Lemoine, M.L., P. Civello, A. Chaves, and G. Martines. 2009. Hot air treatment delays senescene and maintains quality of fresh-cut broccoli florets during refrigerated storage. LWT Food. Sci. Technol. 42: 1076-1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.01.009
  17. Loaiza, J. and M. Cantwell. 1997. Postharvest physiology and quality of cilantro (Coriandrum sativum L.). HortScience 32:104-107.
  18. Lopez-Galvez, G., G. Peiser, X. Nie, and M. Cantwell. 1997. Quality changes in packaged salad products during storage. Zeithschrift Lebensmittel - Untersuchung Forschung. 205:64-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002170050125
  19. Luo, Y., J.L. McEvoy, M.R. Wachtel, J.G. Kim, and Y. Huang. 2004. Package atmosphere affects postharvest biology and quality of fresh-cut cilantro leaves. Hort- Science 39:567-570
  20. Moreira, M.R., A.G. Ponce, C.E. Valle, and S.I. Roura. 2006. Ascorbic acid retention, microbial growth, and sensory acceptability of lettuce leaves, subjected to mild heat shocks. J. Food Sci. 71:S188-S192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.tb08924.x
  21. Olarte, C., S. Sanzz, J.F. Echavarri, and P. Ayala. 2009. Effect of plastic permeability of minimally processed broccoli and cauliflower. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 42: 402-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2008.07.001
  22. Sawai, J. 2003. Quantitative evaluation of antibacterial activities of metallic oxide powders (ZnO, MgO and CaO) by conductimetric assay. J. Microboilogical Methods 54:177-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00037-X
  23. Sawai, J., H. Shiga, and H. Kojima. 2001. Kinetic analysis of the bactericidal action of heated scallopshell powder. Intl. J. Food Microbiol. 71:211-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00619-5
  24. Serrano, M., D. Martinez-Romero, F. Guillen, S. Castillo, and D. Valero. 2006. Maintenance of broccoli quality and functional properties during cold storage as affected by modified atmosphere packaging. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 39:61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.08.004