DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of anchorage and strength of stirrups on shear behavior of high-strength concrete beams

  • Yang, Jun-Mo (Steel Structure Research Division, Research Institute of Industrial Science & Technology) ;
  • Min, Kyung-Hwan (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Yoon, Young-Soo (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University)
  • Received : 2011.09.26
  • Accepted : 2012.01.10
  • Published : 2012.02.10

Abstract

This study investigated possible ways to replace conventional stirrups used on high-strength concrete members with improved reinforcing materials. Headed bar and high-strength steel were chosen to substitute for conventional stirrups, and an experimental comparison between the shear behavior of high-strength concrete large beams reinforced with conventional stirrups and the chosen stirrup substitutes was made. Test results indicated that the headed bar and the high-strength steel led to a significant reserve of shear strength and a good redistribution of shear between stirrups after shear cracking. This is due to the headed bar providing excellent end anchorage and the high-strength steel successfully resisting higher and sudden shear transmission from the concrete to the shear reinforcement. Experimental results presented in this paper were also compared with various prediction models for shear strength of concrete members.

Keywords

References

  1. American Concrete Institute (ACI) (2008), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, ACI 318-08 and ACI 318M-08, Farmington Hills, MI.
  2. Angelakos, D., Bentz, E.C. and Collins, M.P. (2001), "Effect of concrete strength and minimum stirrup on shear strength of large members", ACI Struct. J., 98(3), 290-300.
  3. ASTM International (2007), Standard Specification for Headed Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement, ASTM A970-07, West Conshohocken, PA.
  4. Bentz, E.C. and Collins, M.P. (2000), RESPONSE 2000, Version 1.05, University of Toronto, Ontario.
  5. Canadian Standards Association (CSA) (2004), Design of Concrete Structures, CSA A23.3-04, Mississauga, Ontario.
  6. Collins, M.P. and Kuchma, D. (1999), "How safe are our large, lightly reinforced concrete beams, slabs, and footings?" ACI Struct. J., 96(4), 482-490.
  7. Collins, M.P. and Mitchell, D. (1991), Prestressed Concrete Structures, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  8. Collins, M.P., Mitchell, D. and MacGregor, J.G. (1993), "Structural design consideration for high-strength concrete", Concrete Int., 15(5), 27-34.
  9. European Standard (2003), Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures - Part 1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, prEN 1992-1-1, Final draft, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
  10. Gardner, N.J. (2005), ACI 318-05, CSA A23.3-04, Eurocode 2 (2003), DIN 1045-1 (2001), BS 8110-97 and CEB-FIP MC 90 provisions for punching shear of reinforced concrete flat slabs. Punching Shear in Reinforced Concrete Slabs", SP-232 (Ed. Polak MA), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.
  11. Gayed, R.B. and Ghali, A. (2004), "Double-head studs as shear reinforcement in concrete I-beams", ACI Struct. J., 101(4), 549-557.
  12. Ghali, A. and Dilger, W. (1998), "Anchoring with double-head studs", Concrete Int., 20(11), 21-24.
  13. Ghali, A. and Youakim, S.A. (2005), "Headed studs in concrete: state of the art", ACI Struct. J., 102(5), 657-667.
  14. Griezic, A., Cook, W.D. and Mitchell, D. (1994), "Tests to determine performance of deformed welded wire fabric stirrups", ACI Struct. J., 91(2), 211-220.
  15. Johnson, M.K. and Ramirez, J.A. (1989), "Minimum shear reinforcement in beams with higher strength concrete", ACI Struct. J., 86(4), 376-382.
  16. Joint ACI-ASCE Committee 445 (1998), "Recent approaches to shear design of structural concrete", J. Struct. Eng., 124(12), 1375-1417. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:12(1375)
  17. Mast, R.F., Dawood, M., Rizkalla, S.H. and Zia, P. (2008), "Flexural strength design of concrete beams reinforced with high-strength steel bars", ACI Struct. J., 105(4), 570-577.
  18. Roller, J.J. and Russel, H.G. (1990), "Shear strength of high-strength concrete beams with web reinforcement", ACI Struct. J., 87(2), 191-198.
  19. Sumpter, M.S., Rizkalla, S.H. and Zia, P. (2009), "Behavior of high-performance steel as shear reinforcement for concrete beams", ACI Struct. J., 106(2), 171-177.
  20. Tompos, E.J. and Frosch, R.J. (2002), "Influence of beam size, longitudinal reinforcement, and stirrup effectiveness on concrete shear strength", ACI Struct. J., 99(5), 559-567.
  21. Yang, J.M., Yoon, Y.S., Cook, W.D. and Mitchell, D. (2010), "Punching shear behavior of two-way slabs reinforced with high-strength steel", ACI Struct. J., 107(4), 468-475.
  22. Yoon, Y.S., Cook, W.D. and Mitchell, D. (1996), "Minimum shear reinforcement in normal, medium, and highstrength concrete beams", ACI Struct. J., 93(5), 576-584.

Cited by

  1. Bond behaviour of straight, hooked, U-shaped and headed bars in cracked concrete vol.17, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201500199
  2. FE modeling of inelastic behavior of reinforced high-strength concrete continuous beams vol.49, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.49.3.373