Smart Structures and Systems

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

SHM benchmark for high-rise structures: a reduced-order finite element model and field measurement data

  • Ni, Y.Q. (Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University) ;
  • Xia, Y. (Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University) ;
  • Lin, W. (Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University) ;
  • Chen, W.H. (Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University) ;
  • Ko, J.M. (Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)
  • Received : 2011.12.21
  • Accepted : 2012.05.21
  • Published : 2012.10.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Canton Tower (formerly named Guangzhou New TV Tower) of 610 m high has been instrumented with a long-term structural health monitoring (SHM) system consisting of over 700 sensors of sixteen types. Under the auspices of the Asian-Pacific Network of Centers for Research in Smart Structures Technology (ANCRiSST), an SHM benchmark problem for high-rise structures has been developed by taking the instrumented Canton Tower as a host structure. This benchmark problem aims to provide an international platform for direct comparison of various SHM-related methodologies and algorithms with the use of real-world monitoring data from a large-scale structure, and to narrow the gap that currently exists between the research and the practice of SHM. This paper first briefs the SHM system deployed on the Canton Tower, and the development of an elaborate three-dimensional (3D) full-scale finite element model (FEM) and the validation of the model using the measured modal data of the structure. In succession comes the formulation of an equivalent reduced-order FEM which is developed specifically for the benchmark study. The reduced-order FEM, which comprises 37 beam elements and a total of 185 degrees-of-freedom (DOFs), has been elaborately tuned to coincide well with the full-scale FEM in terms of both modal frequencies and mode shapes. The field measurement data (including those obtained from 20 accelerometers, one anemometer and one temperature sensor) from the Canton Tower, which are available for the benchmark study, are subsequently presented together with a description of the sensor deployment locations and the sensor specifications.

Keywords

References

  1. Adewuyi, A.P., Wu, Z.S. and Serker, N.H.M.K. (2009), "Assessment of vibration-based damage identification methods using displacement and distributed strain measurements", Struct. Health Monit., 8, 443-461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921709340964
  2. Aktan, A.E., Chase, S., Inman, D. and Pines, D.D. (2001), "Monitoring and managing the health of infrastructure systems", in: Health Monitoring and Management of Civil Infrastructure Systems, (Eds. Chase, S.B. and Aktan, A.E.), Proceedings of the SPIE Vol. 4337, SPIE, Bellingham, Washington, USA (CD-ROM).
  3. Brownjohn, J.M.W. (2007), "Structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure", Philos. T. R. Soc. A., 365(1851), 589-622. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1925
  4. Carden, E.P. and Fanning, P. (2004), "Vibration based condition monitoring: a review", Struct. Health Monit., 3(4), 355-377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921704047500
  5. Catbas, F.N. and Aktan, A.E. (2002), "Condition and damage assessment: issues and some promising indices", J. Struct. Eng.- ASCE, 128(8), 1026-1036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:8(1026)
  6. Chang, P.C., Flatau, A. and Liu, S.C. (2003), "Health monitoring of civil infrastructure", Struct. Health Monit., 2, 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921703036169
  7. DeWolf, J.T., Lauzon, R.G. and Culmo, M.P. (2002), "Monitoring bridge performance", Struct. Health Monit., 1(2), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921702001002001
  8. Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R. and Prime, M.B. (1998), "A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods", Shock Vib., 30, 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/058310249803000201
  9. Fujino, Y., Siringoringo, D.M. and Abe, M. (2009), "The needs for advanced sensor technologies in risk assessment of civil infrastructures", Smart Struct. Syst., 5(2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2009.5.2.173
  10. Glisic, B., Inaudi, D. and Casanova, N. (2009), "SHM process lessons learned in 250 SHM projects", in: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructure, Zurich, Switzerland (CD-ROM).
  11. Gorl, E. and Link, M. (2003), "Damage identification using changes of eigenfrequencies and mode shapes", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 17(1), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.2002.1545
  12. Hao, H. and Xia, Y. (2002), "Vibration-based damage detection of structures by genetic algorithm", J. Comput. Civil Eng., 16(3), 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2002)16:3(222)
  13. Ko, J.M. and Ni, Y.Q. (2005), "Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges", Eng. Struct., 27(12), 1715-1725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.021
  14. Lu, Z.R. and Law, S.S. (2007), "Features of dynamic response sensitivity and its application in damage detection", J. Sound Vib., 303(1-2), 305-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.01.021
  15. Ni, Y.Q., Wong, K.Y. and Xia, Y. (2011), "Health checks through landmark bridges to sky-high structures", Adv. Struct. Eng., 14(1), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.14.1.103
  16. Ni, Y.Q., Xia, Y., Liao, W.Y. and Ko, J.M. (2009), "Technology innovation in developing the structural health monitoring system for Guangzhou New TV Tower", Struct. Control Health Monit., 16(1), 73-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.303
  17. Ou, J. and Li, H. (2009), Structural health monitoring research in China: trends and applications, in: Structural Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructure Systems, (Eds., Karbhari, V.M. and Ansari, F.), Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK, 463-516.
  18. Rolander, D.D., Phares, B.M., Graybeal, B.A., Moore, M.E. and Washer, G.A. (2001), "Highway bridge inspection: state-of-the-practice survey", Transport. Res. Record, 1749, 73-81. https://doi.org/10.3141/1749-12
  19. Sohn, H., Farrar, C.R., Hemez, F.M., Shunk, D.D., Stinemates, D.W., Nadler, B.R. and Czarnecki, J.J. (2004), A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996-2001, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Report LA-13976-MS, Los Alamos, USA.
  20. Wang, M.L. and Yim, J. (2010), "Sensor enriched infrastructure system", Smart Struct. Syst., 6(3), 309-333. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2010.6.3.309
  21. Wong, K.Y. (2004), "Instrumentation and health monitoring of cable-supported bridges", Struct. Control Health Monit., 11(2), 91-124. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.33
  22. Xia, Y., Ni, Y.Q., Zhang, P, Liao, W.Y. and Ko, J.M. (2011), "Stress development of a super-tall structure during construction: field monitoring and numerical analysis", Comput. Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng., 26(7), 542-559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00714.x
  23. Yun, C.B., Lee, J.J. and Koo, K.Y. (2011), "Smart structure technologies for civil infrastructures in Korea: recent research and applications", Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 7(9), 673-688. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470902720109

Cited by

  1. Online Simultaneous Reconstruction of Wind Load and Structural Responses-Theory and Application to Canton Tower vol.30, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12134
  2. Structural health monitoring of Shanghai Tower during different stages using a Bayesian approach vol.23, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1840
  3. A low-cost version of electro-mechanical impedance technique for damage detection in reinforced concrete structures using multiple piezo configurations vol.20, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216677124
  4. Operational modal analysis of Canton Tower by a fast frequency domain Bayesian method vol.17, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.17.2.209
  5. PTMD Control on a Benchmark TV Tower under Earthquake and Wind Load Excitations vol.7, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/app7040425
  6. Health monitoring sensor placement optimization for Canton Tower using immune monkey algorithm vol.22, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1664
  7. Analysis of Dynamic Characteristics of the Canton Tower under Different Earthquakes vol.18, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.18.7.1087
  8. Automated identification of the modal parameters of a cable-stayed bridge: Influence of the wind conditions vol.17, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.17.3.431
  9. Real-Time System Identification: An Algorithm for Simultaneous Model Class Selection and Parametric Identification vol.30, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12146
  10. Free-Interface Modal Synthesis Based Substructural Damage Detection Method vol.2014, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/741697
  11. Markov chain Monte Carlo-based Bayesian method for structural model updating and damage detection 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2140
  12. Novel Outlier-Resistant Extended Kalman Filter for Robust Online Structural Identification vol.141, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000810
  13. Operational modal analysis of a high-rise multi-function building with dampers by a Bayesian approach vol.86, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.10.009
  14. Stationary and nonstationary analysis on the wind characteristics of a tropical storm vol.17, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.17.6.1067
  15. Structural finite element model updating using incomplete ambient vibration modal data vol.57, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5619-9
  16. New insights into coherence analysis with a view towards extracting structural natural frequencies under operational conditions vol.77, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.08.038
  17. Review of Benchmark Studies and Guidelines for Structural Health Monitoring vol.16, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.16.7.1187
  18. Quantity vs. Quality in the Model Order Reduction (MOR) of a Linear System vol.13, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.1.099
  19. The MIT Green Building benchmark problem for structural health monitoring of tall buildings 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2115
  20. Nonlinear data-driven computational models for response prediction and change detection vol.22, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1673
  21. Integration and evaluation of multiple piezo configurations for optimal health monitoring of reinforced concrete structures vol.28, pp.19, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X17698243
  22. Optimal sensor placement in structural health monitoring using discrete optimization vol.24, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/24/12/125034
  23. Multiple Pounding Tuned Mass Damper (MPTMD) control on benchmark tower subjected to earthquake excitations vol.11, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.6.1123
  24. Model updating and variability analysis of modal parameters for super high-rise structure pp.15320626, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4712
  25. Identifiability-Enhanced Bayesian Frequency-Domain Substructure Identification vol.33, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12377
  26. Probabilistic assessment of vibration exceedance for a full-scale tall building under typhoon conditions vol.27, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1516
  27. Integrated multi-type sensor placement and response reconstruction method for high-rise buildings under unknown seismic loading vol.27, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1453
  28. Computational modeling of a unique tower in Kuwait for structural health monitoring: Numerical investigations vol.26, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2317
  29. Dynamic torsional response measurement model using motion capture system vol.19, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2017.19.6.679
  30. Performance-based optimal design of tuned impact damper for seismically excited nonlinear building vol.160, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.042
  31. Bayesian ballast damage detection utilizing a modified evolutionary algorithm vol.21, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2018.21.4.435
  32. Finite element model calibration of a steel railway bridge via ambient vibration test vol.27, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.3.327
  33. Investigation of the SHM-oriented model and dynamic characteristics of a super-tall building vol.23, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2019.23.3.295
  34. Mono-Component Feature Extraction for Condition Assessment in Civil Structures Using Empirical Wavelet Transform vol.19, pp.19, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/s19194280
  35. A vision-based system for long-distance remote monitoring of dynamic displacement: experimental verification on a supertall structure vol.24, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2019.24.6.769
  36. A review on dynamic substructuring methods for model updating and damage detection of large-scale structures vol.23, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219872429
  37. Ambient Effect Filtering Using NLPCA-SVR in High-Rise Buildings vol.20, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/s20041143
  38. Computational methodologies for optimal sensor placement in structural health monitoring: A review vol.19, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921719877579
  39. A Multiobjective Perspective to Optimal Sensor Placement by Using a Decomposition-Based Evolutionary Algorithm in Structural Health Monitoring vol.10, pp.21, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217710
  40. Output-only modal analysis for non-synchronous data using stochastic sub-space identification vol.230, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111702
  41. Innovative stabilization diagram for automated structural modal identification based on ERA and hierarchical cluster analysis vol.11, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-021-00514-8
  42. Comparison of response transmissibility and power spectral density transmissibility on operational modal analysis vol.160, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107912
  43. An improved complex multi-task Bayesian compressive sensing approach for compression and reconstruction of SHM data vol.167, pp.no.pa, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108531