The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy

The Korean Society of Physical Therapy (대한물리치료학회)
권호 표지

Functional Electric Stimulation-assisted Biofeedback Therapy System for Chronic Hemiplegic Upper Extremity Function

  • Received : 2012.11.27
  • Accepted : 2012.12.11
  • Published : 2012.12.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Rehabilitative devices are used to enhance sensorimotor training protocols, for improvement of motor function in the hemiplegic limb of patients who have suffered a stroke. Sensorimotor integration feedback systems, included with these devices, are very good therapeutic frameworks. We applied this approach using electrical stimulation in stroke patients and examined whether a functional electric stimulation-assisted biofeedback therapy system could improve function of the upper extremity in chronic hemiplegia. Methods: A prototype biofeedback system was used by six subjects to perform a set of tasks with their affected upper extremity during a 30-minute session for 20 consecutive working days. When needed for a grasping or releasing movement of objects, the functional electrical stimulation (FES) stimulated the wrist and finger flexor or extensor and assisted the patients in grasping or releasing the objects. Kinematic data provided by the biofeedback system were acquired. In addition, clinical performance scales and activity of daily living skills were evaluated before and after application of a prototype biofeedback system. Results: Our findings revealed statistically significant gradual improvement in patients with stroke, in terms of kinematic and clinical performance during the treatment sessions, in terms of manual function test and the Purdue pegboard. However, no significant difference of the motor activity log was found. Conclusion: Hemiplegic upper extremity function of a small group of patients with chronic hemiparesis was improved through two weeks of training using the FES-assisted biofeedback system. Further research into the use of biofeedback systems for long-term clinical improvement will be needed.

Keywords

References

  1. Joel AD. Physical medicine and rehabilitation 4th edition. Philadelphia, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2004.
  2. Kwon YH, Kwon JW, Park SY et al. Cortical activation by transcranial direct current stimulation and functional electrical stimulation in normal subjects: 2 case studies. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2011;23:77-82.
  3. Malhotra S, Rosewilliam S, Hermens H et al. A randomized controlled trial of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation applied early after acute stroke: effects on wrist pain, spasticity and contractures. Clin Rehabil. 2012. [Epub ahead of print]
  4. Randall LB. Physical medicine and rehabilitation. Philadelphia, WB Saunders Co., 1996.
  5. Gritsenko V, Prochazka A. A functional electric stimulation-assisted exercise therapy system for hemiplegic hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(6):881-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.094
  6. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J et al. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(4):477-82. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2003.50110
  7. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC et al. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(7):952-9. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.33101
  8. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? Curr Opin Neurol. 2001;14(6):745-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/00019052-200112000-00011
  9. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74(4):347-54.
  10. Ryu IT, Hwang BY, Kim JH et al. The effects of constraintinduced movement therapy on improvement of hand function in hemiplegic side. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2009;21:9-14.
  11. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW et al. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354(9174):191-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09477-X
  12. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW et al. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. Stroke. 1997;28(8):1550-6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.28.8.1550
  13. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F et al. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791-4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5269.1791
  14. Jones TA, Schallert T. Use-dependent growth of pyramidal neurons after neocortical damage. J Neurosci. 1994;14(4):2140-52.
  15. Kozlowski DA, James DC, Schallert T. Use-dependent exaggeration of neuronal injury after unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions. J Neurosci. 1996;16(15):4776-86.
  16. Kozlowski DA, Schallert T. Relationship between dendritic pruning and behavioral recovery following sensorimotor cortex lesions. Behav Brain Res. 1998;97:89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(98)00030-8