The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screws on CAD/CAM custom-made implant abutments

CAD/CAM을 이용한 맞춤형 임플란트 지대주의 나사 풀림 토크 평가

  • Lee, Chang-Jae (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Yang, Sung-Eun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Seok-Gyu (Department of Prosthodontics, Samsung Medical Center, College of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 이창재 (가톨릭대학교 임상치과학대학원 치과보철학과) ;
  • 양성은 (가톨릭대학교 임상치과학대학원 치과보철학과) ;
  • 김석규 (성균관대학교 의과대학 치과학교실)
  • Received : 2012.04.05
  • Accepted : 2012.04.19
  • Published : 2012.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the screw joint stability between the CADCAM custom-made implant abutment and the prefabricated implant abutment by measuring the reverse torque value after cyclic loading. Materials and methods: Twelve screw type implants (Implantium, Dentium Co., Seoul, Korea) were embedded in aluminum cylinder with acrylic resin. The implant specimens were equally divided into 3 groups, and connected to the prefabricated titanium abutments (Implantium, Dentium Co., Seoul, Korea), CADCAM custom-made titanium abutments (Myplant, Raphabio Co., Seoul, Korea) and CADCAM custom-made zirconia abutments (Zirconia Myplant, Raphabio Co., Seoul, Korea). The CAD-CAM milled titanium crown (Raphabio Co., Seoul, Korea) was cemented on each implant abutment by resin cement. Before cyclic loading, each abutment screw was tightened to 30 Ncm and the reverse torque value was measured about 30 minutes later. After the crown specimen was subjected to the sinusoidal cyclic loading (30 to 120 N, 500,000 cycles, 2 Hz), postloading reverse torque value was measured and the reverse torque loss ratio was calculated. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis of the reverse torque loss ratio. Results: The CADCAM custom-made titanium abutments presented higher values in reverse torque loss ratio without statistically significant differences than the prefabricated titanium abutments ($P$>.05). Reverse torque loss ratio of the custom-made zirconia abutments was significantly higher compared to that of the prefabricated titanium abutments ($P$=.014). Conclusion: Within the limitation of the present $in-vitro$ study, it was concluded that there was no significant difference in screw joint stability between the CADCAM custom-made titanium abutments and the prefabricated titanium abutments. On the other hand, the CADCAM custom-made zirconia abutments showed lower screw joint stability than prefabricated titanium abutments.

연구 목적: 본 연구는 국내 개발된 맞춤형 임플란트 지대주와 기성 임플란트 지대주의 반복 하중 전과 후의 나사 풀림 토크 값을 측정, 비교하여 나사 결합부 안전성에 차이가 있는지를 알아보고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 총 12개의 임플란트 고정체(Implantium, Dentium Co., Seoul, Korea)를 알루미늄 원통에 레진으로 고정하고, 그것을 각각 4개씩, 3개의 군으로 나눠서 각 군별로 기성 티타늄 지대주(Implantium, Dentium Co., Seoul, Korea), 캐드캠 맞춤형 티타늄 지대주(Myplant, Raphabio Co., Seoul, Korea), 그리고 금속 연결부가 있는 캐드캠 맞춤형 지르코니아 지대주(Zirconia Myplant, Raphabio Co., Seoul, Korea)를 제작하여 임플란트에 연결하였다. 금속관은 지대주에 맞춰서 티타늄을 밀링해서 제작한뒤 지대주에 합착하였다. 반복 하중을 가하기 전에 지대주 나사를 30 Ncm 토크로 조이고 약 30분 후 나사의 초기 풀림 토크값을 측정하였다. 그 후 반복 하중을 30 N에서 120 N의 싸인 곡선을 이루는 압축력으로 2 Hz의 빈도로 50만 싸이클을 가하고 하중 후 풀림 토크값을 측정하였으며, 풀림 토크 상실률을 구하여서 군끼리 비교하였다. 나사의 풀림 토크값의 상실률의 비교를 위해 Kruskal-Wallis test를 이용해서 유의수준 .05에서 분석하였다. 결과: 반복하중 후 나사 풀림 상실률에서 기성 티타늄 지대주 군에 비해 맞춤형 티타늄 지대주는 높은 값을 보였으나 유의성 있는 차이를 보이지 않았다($P$>.05). 반면, 맞춤형 지르코니아 지대주는 기성 티타늄 지대주에 비해 유의하게 높은 값을 보였다($P$=.014). 결론: 본 실험의 한계 내에서 캐드캠 맞춤형 티타늄 임플란트 지대주는 기성 임플란트 지대주 에 비해 나사 안정성이 떨어진다고 볼 수 없다. 반면, 캐드캠 맞춤형 지르코니아 지대주 는 기성 임플란트 지대주에 비해 나사 안정성이 다소 떨어진다고 볼 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  2. Johns RB, Jemt T, Heath MR, Hutton JE, McKenna S, McNamara DC, van Steenberghe D, Taylor R, Watson RM, Herrmann I. A multicenter study of overdentures supported by Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:513-22.
  3. Jemt T, Laney WR, Harris D, Henry PJ, Krogh PH Jr, Polizzi G, Zarb GA, Herrmann I. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:29-36.
  4. Andersson B, Odman P, Lindvall AM, Lithner B. Single-tooth restorations supported by osseointegrated implants: results and experiences from a prospective study after 2 to 3 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:702-11.
  5. Jorneus L, Jemt T, Carlsson L. Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:353-9.
  6. Misch CE. Principles for screw-retained prostheses. In: Misch CE, ed. Contemporary implant dentistry. Missouri; CV Mosby, 1999.
  7. Bickford JH. An introduction to the design and behavior of bolted joints. New York; Marcel Dekker; 1995.
  8. Jemt T. Customized titanium single-implant abutments: 2-year follow-up pilot study. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:312-6.
  9. Sundh A, Sjogren G. A study of the bending resistance of implantsupported reinforced alumina and machined zirconia abutments and copies. Dent Mater 2008;24:611-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.021
  10. Wu T, Liao W, Dai N, Tang C. Design of a custom angled abutment for dental implants using computer-aided design and nonlinear finite element analysis. J Biomech 2010;43:1941-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.017
  11. Kim S, Kim HI, Brewer JD, Monaco EA Jr. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:226-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60043-3
  12. Henriksson K, Jemt T. Evaluation of custom-made procera ceramic abutments for single-implant tooth replacement: a prospective 1-year follow-up study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:626-
  13. Lang LA, Sierraalta M, Hoffensperger M, Wang RF. Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:652-8.
  14. Magne P, Oderich E, Boff LL, Cardoso AC, Belser UC. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of CAD/CAM composite resin implant abutments restored with type III composite resin and porcelain veneers. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:1275-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02103.x
  15. Magne P, Paranhos MP, Burnett LH Jr, Magne M, Belser UC. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of novel-design anterior single- tooth implant restorations: influence of material selection for type III veneers bonded to zirconia abutments. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:195-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02012.x
  16. Kreissl ME, Gerds T, Muche R, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Technical complications of implant-supported fixed partial dentures in partially edentulous cases after an average observation period of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:720-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01414.x
  17. Haack JE, Sakaguchi RL, Sun T, Coffey JP. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:529-36.
  18. Martin WC, Woody RD, Miller BH, Miller AW. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:24-32. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.116230
  19. Cibirka RM, Nelson SK, Lang BR, Rueggeberg FA. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:268-75. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114266
  20. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Nelson EW, Tietge JD. Torque required to loosen single-tooth implant abutment screws before and after simulated function. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:435-9.
  21. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Sadler JP, McKay ML. Comparison of screw loosening, rotation, and deflection among three implant designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:270-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80134-9
  22. Carlsson GE, Haraldson T. Functional response. In: Branemark PI. Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. (eds). Tissue integrated prostheses. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. 4th ed. Chicago; Quintessence; 1986. p. 74-8.
  23. Bates JF, Stafford GD, Harrison A. Masticatory function - a review of the literature. III. Masticatory performance and efficiency. J Oral Rehabil 1976;3:57-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1976.tb00929.x
  24. Richter EJ. In vivo vertical forces on implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:99-108.
  25. Mericske-Stern R, Zarb GA. In vivo measurements of some functional aspects with mandibular fixed prostheses supported by implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:153-61. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070209.x
  26. Patterson EA, Johns RB. Theoretical analysis of the fatigue life of fixture screws in osseointegrated dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:26-33.
  27. Jaarda MJ, Razzoog ME, Gratton DG. Effect of preload torque on the ultimate tensile strength of implant prosthetic retaining screws. Implant Dent 1994;3:17-21. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199404000-00002
  28. Mitrani R, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Ma T. Accuracy of electronic implant torque controllers following time in clinical service. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:394-9.
  29. Cantwell A, Hobkirk JA. Preload loss in gold prosthesis-retaining screws as a function of time. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:124-32.
  30. Gutierrez J, Nicholls JI, Libman WJ, Butson TJ. Accuracy of the implant torque wrench following time in clinical service. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:562-7.
  31. Kim DG, Park CJ, Cho LR. Comparison of accuracy of implant torque controllers. J Korean Acad Stomatognathic Func Occl 2008;24:157-68.

Cited by

  1. A comparative study on the fit and screw joint stability of ready-made abutment and CAD-CAM custom-made abutment vol.51, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2013.51.4.276
  2. 임플란트 고정체와 지대주의 체결방식에 따른 스크류 풀림토크에 관한연구 vol.35, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2013.35.3.201
  3. Mechanical Complications of Posterior Implant Restorations using CAD/CAM Titanium Customized Abutments: A Retrospective Study vol.23, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.2019012