DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Surface changes of denture base resin according to two toothpastes and a kitchen detergent

일부 세치제와 주방세제 사용에 의한 의치상 레진의 표면변화

  • Kang, Jae-Kyoung (Dept. of Dental hygiene, Shingu College) ;
  • Kim, Soo-Hwa (Dept. of Dental hygiene, Hanyang Women's University) ;
  • Yoo, Eun-Mi (Dept. of Dental hygiene, Gangdong University) ;
  • Choi, Hye-Sook (Dept. of Dental hygiene, Gangdong University) ;
  • Choi, Yu-Ri (Dept. and Research Institute of Dental Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Mahn (Dept. and Research Institute of Dental Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • 강재경 (신구대학교 치위생과) ;
  • 김수화 (한양여자대학교 치위생과) ;
  • 유은미 (강동대학교 치위생과) ;
  • 최혜숙 (강동대학교 치위생과) ;
  • 최유리 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과생체재료공학교실) ;
  • 김광만 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과생체재료공학교실)
  • Received : 2012.05.02
  • Accepted : 2012.06.22
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

Objectives : This study evaluated the changes in surface roughness of denture base resin according to the types of denture cleansers. Methods : A denture base resin(Vertex RS, Dentimax, Netherland) was used. Two toothpaste(Antiplaque, Bukwang, Korea; 2080, Aekyung, Korea) and a kitchen detergent(Trio, Aekyung, Korea) were used as a denture cleanser. The specimens were put on the V8 crossbrushing machine(Sabri enterprises, Downers grove, IL, USA) to reproduce toothbrushing and the toothbrushes were flat, round end and soft type. The surfaces of denture base resin specimens were observed by profilometer(SJ-400, MITUTOYO, Japan) and SEM(S-3000N, Hitachi Co., Ibaraki, Japan). Results : 1. According to the result of measuring surface roughness, there was statistically significant difference in Ra, Rq, and Rz(p<0.05). 2. As for Ra, Rq and Rz, Antiplaque toothpaste showed the highest roughness, and there was significant difference from other groups(p<0.01). 2080 toothpaste, Trio, and distilled water were classified as the same group. 3. According to the result of observation with the SEM, the surfaces of the Antiplaque toothpaste group after toothbrushing showed the greatest roughness, and the surfaces of 2080 toothpaste, Trio, and distilled water groups were rough in order. Trio and distilled water had the surfaces similar to those before toothbrushing. Conclusions : Studies to compare the efficacy of denture management methods and examine the effects of denture cleansers on denture materials will be helpful for dental hygienists and dentists providing patients with proper information and education. And it will be also useful for denture users' oral health.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 교육과학기술부

References

  1. STATISTICS KOREA. The 2010 Population and Housing Census. http://census.go.kr 2011:22.
  2. Kim YS, Jun BH. A Study of comparetive the mastication capability and life quality of elderly pepple using dentures or implants. J Korean Society of Dental Hygiene 2011;11(5);629-636.
  3. Yoneyama T, Yoshida M, Matsui T, Sasaki H. Oral care and pneumonia. Oral Care Working Group. Lancet 1999;354(9177):515. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)75552-5
  4. Gornitsky M, ParadisI I, Landaverde G, Malo AM, Velly AM. A clinical and microbiological evaluation of denture cleansers for geriatric patients in long term care institutions. J Can Dent Assoc 2002;68(1):39-45.
  5. Salles AE, Macedo LD, Fernandes RA, Silva-Lovato CH, Paranhos Hde F. Comparative analysis of biofilm levels in complete upper and lower dentures after brushing associated with specific denture paste and neutral soap. Gerodontology 2007;24(4):217-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2007.00169.x
  6. Harrison Z, Johnson A, Douglas CW. An in vitro study into the effect of a limited range of denture cleaners on surface roughness and removal of Candida albicans from conventional heat-cured acrylic resin denture base material. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31(5):460-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01250.x
  7. Neppelenbroek KH, Pavarina AC, Vergani CE, Giampaolo ET. Hardness of heat-polymerized acrylic resins after disinfection and long-term water immersion. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93(2):171-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.020
  8. Glass RT, Bullard JW, Hadley CS, Mix EW, Conrad RS. Partial spectrum microorganisms found in dentures and possible disease implications. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2001;101(2): 92-94.
  9. McCabe JF, Murray ID, Kelly PJ. The efficacy of denture cleansers. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1995;3(5):203-207.
  10. Paranhos Hde F, da Silva CH, Venezian GC, Macedo LD, de Souza RF. Distribution of biofilm on internal and external surfaces of upper complete dentures: the effect of hygiene instruction. Gerodontology 2007;24(3):162-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2007.00177.x
  11. Freitas-Pontes KM, Silva-Lovato CH, Paranhos HF. Mass loss of four commercially available heat-polymerize acrylic resins after toothbrushing with three different dentifrices. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17(2):116-121. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000200009
  12. Dyer D, MacDonald E, Newcombe RG, et al. Abrasion and stain removal by different manual toothbrushes and brush actions: studies in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 2001;28(2):121-127. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028002121.x
  13. de Freitas KM, Paranhos Hde F. Weight loss of five commercially available denture teeth after toothbrushing with three different dentifrices. J Appl Oral Sci 2006;14(4):242-246. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572006000400006
  14. Haselden CA, Hobkirk JA, Pearson GJ, Davies EH. Comparison between the wear resistance of three types of denture resin to three different dentifrices. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25(5):335-339. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00250.x
  15. Pisani MX, Bruhn JP, Paranhos HF, et al. Evaluation of the abrasiveness of Dentifrices for Complete Dentures. J Prosthodont. 2010;19(5):369-373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00592.x
  16. Manly RS, Wiren J, Manly PJ, Keene RC. A method for measruement of abrasion of dentin by toothbrush and dentifrice. J Dent Res 1965;44:533-540. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345650440031601
  17. Vieira DF. Phillips RW. Influence of certain variables on the abrasion of acrylic resin veneering materials. J Prosthet Dent 1962;12:720-731. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(62)90100-2
  18. Camargo IM, Saiki M, Vasconcellos MB, Avila DM. Abrasiveness evaluation of silica and calcium carbonate used in the production of dentifrices. J Cosmet Sci 2001;52(3):163-167.
  19. Heath JR, Wilson HJ. The effect of dentifrices on restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 1974;1(1):47-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1974.tb01264.x
  20. Heath JR, Davenport JC, Jones PA. The abrasion of acrylic resin by cleaning pastes. J Oral Rehabil 1983;10(2):159-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1983.tb00110.x
  21. Murray ID, McCabe JF, Storer R. The relationship between the abrasivity and cleaning power of the dentifrice-type denture cleaners. Br Dent J 1986;161(6):205-228. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805932
  22. Peracini A, Davi LR, de Queiroz Ribeiro N, et al. Effect of denture cleansers on physical properties of heat- polymerized acrylic resin. J Prosthodont Res 2010;54(2):78-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2009.11.004
  23. Budtz-Jorgensen E. Materials and methods for cleaning denture. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42(6):619-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90190-2
  24. Murata H, Chimori H, Hong G, Hamada T, Nikawa H. Compatibility of tissue conditioners and denture cleansers: influence on surface conditions. Dent Mater J 2010;29(4):446-453. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-135
  25. Paranhos HF, Silva-Lovato CH, de Souza RF, et al. Effect of three methods for cleaning dentures of biofilms formed in vitro on acrylic resin. J Prosthodont 2009;18(5):427-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00450.x
  26. Murata H, Chimori H, Hong G, Hamada T, Nikawa H. Compatibility of tissue conditioners and denture cleansers: influence on surface conditions. Dent Mater J 2010;29(4):446-531. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-135
  27. Dikbas I, Koksal T, Calikkocaoglu S. Investigation of the cleanliness of denture in a university hospital. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19(3):294-298.
  28. Budtz-Jorgensen E. The significance of Candida albicans in denture stomatitis. Scand J Dent Res 1974;82(2):151-190.
  29. Kim HJ, Lee YG. A study of the oral health status and the need of oral management of elderly. J Korean Acad Dental Hygiene Education 2009;9(4):824-835.
  30. ISO. Dentistry-Base polmer Part 1: Denture base polymers. ISO 20795-1, 2008.
  31. Kim JB, Paik DI, Moon HS et al. Clinical Preventive Dentistry. 3rd edition. Seoul: Komoonsa:2000:103.
  32. Ha JE, Kamg YJ, Jin BH, Paik DI, Bae KH. Relative tooth abrasivity of the dentifrices marketed in Korea. J Kor Acad Oral Health 2011;35(1):18-22.
  33. Scurria MS, Powers JM. Surface roughness of two polished ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71(2):174-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90027-2
  34. Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Hassan MM. Surface roughness of dentin after tooth preparation with different rotary instrumentation. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75(2):122-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90087-6
  35. Bessing C, Wiktorsson A. Comparison of two different methods of polishing porcelain. Scan J Dent Res 1983;91(6):482-487.
  36. Fermandes RA, Lovato-Silva CH, Paranhos Hde F, Ito IY. Efficacy of three denture brushes on biofilm removal from complete denture. J Appl Oral Sci 2007;15(1):39-43. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000100009
  37. Keng SB, Lim M. Denture plaque distribution and effectiveness of a perborate-containing denture cleanse. Quintessence Int 1996;24(5):341-345.
  38. Shay K. Denture Hygiene: A review and update. J Contemp Dent Pract 2000;1(2):28-41.
  39. Nikawa H, Hamada T, Yamamoto T. Denture plaque-past and recent concerns. J Dent 1998;26(4):299-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00026-2
  40. Korean Dental Association. Survey on the 2010 National Oral Health. Seoul:Ministry of Health & Welfare;2010:518.
  41. Lee JY, Kim YK, Jeong YS, Kang KH, Hwang SJ. The effect of different denture cleansing agents on the abrasion test of denture base material and survival rate of Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans. J Kor Acad Oral Health 2010;34(1):18-27.
  42. Jagger DC, Al-Akhazam L, Harrison A, Rees JS. The effectiveness of seven denture cleansers on tea stain removal from PMMA acrylic resin. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15(6): 549-552.
  43. Berger JC, Driscoll CF, Romberg E, Luo Q, Thompson G. Surface roughness of denture base acrylic resins after processing and after polishing. J Prosthodont 2006;15(3):180-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00098.x
  44. Verran J, Maryan CJ. Retention of Candida albicans on acrylic resin and silicone of different surface topography. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77(5):535-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70148-3
  45. Yap AU, Wu SS, Chelvan S, Tan ES. Effect of hygiene maintenance procedures on surface roughness of composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2005;30(1):99-104.
  46. Oliveira LV, Mesquita MF, Henriques GE, Consani RL. The effect of brushing on surface roughness of denture lining materials. J Prosthodont 2007;16(3):179-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00169.x

Cited by

  1. Effect of non-thermal atmospheric pressure nitrogen and air plasma on the surface properties and the disinfection of denture base resin vol.14, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2014.14.05.783
  2. 티트리 성분 함유 의치세정제의 항균 효과 vol.16, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.17135/jdhs.2016.16.6.409
  3. Streptococcus mutans에 대한 티트리의 항균 효과 vol.17, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2017.17.04.613
  4. 까마중 추출물의 Candida albicans에 대한 항균효과에 대한 융합적 연구 vol.9, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.15207/jkcs.2018.9.12.069
  5. Evaluation of abrasion for non-abrasive denture cleanser vol.21, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.20210010