Changes in Accommodative Function after VDT Work

VDT 작업 후의 조절기능 변화

  • Seo, Eun-Sun (Dept. of Optometry and Optic Science, Dongshin University)
  • 서은선 (동신대학교 안경광학과)
  • Received : 2012.07.30
  • Accepted : 2012.09.15
  • Published : 2012.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to research any effect on visual function related to accommodation by VDT work. Methods: The refraction power, accommodative lag, accommodative facility, relative accommodation, amplitude of accommodation and blink rate were measured before and after VDT work for 2 hours on 48 university students (16 males and 32 females), without abnormal accommodative function and systemic and ocular disease, who had never undergone corrective eye surgery. All examinations were performed with distant refraction, and a survey was conducted on the items related to subjective symptoms of VDT syndrome. Results: After 2 hours of VDT work, refractive power increased by 0.23 D, the amount of change in accommodative lag were $0.17{\pm}0.42D$ in the right eye and $0.23{\pm}0.47D$ in the left eye (t=2.26, p=0.03). There were statistically significant differences. Both the accommodative facility and relative accommodation and amplitude of accommodation were decreased after work. However, blink rate were increased. After VDT work, 33.4% of the subjects showed subjective symptoms of asthenopia and 33.3% of them showed shoulder pain. Conclusions: As a result, the accommodative lag increased in response to the two hours of VDT work, and overall accommodative functions were decreased. In addition, as symptoms of providing visual strain, asthenopia showed the most prominent subjective symptoms.

목적: VDT 작업이 조절기능에 주는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 방법: 조절기능 이상과 전신 및 안질환이 없고 교정수술을 받은 경험이 없는 대학생 48명(남 16명, 여 32명)을 대상으로 VDT 작업 전과 2시간 작업 후의 굴절력, 조절래그, 조절용이성, 상대조절력과 최대조절력, 순목 횟수 값을 측정하였다. 원거리 굴절교정 도수를 착용한 상태에서 모든 검사를 실시하였고 VDT 증후군의 자각증상에 관련된 항목에 대해 설문조사를 실시하였다. 결과: 2시간동안 VDT 작업 후의 굴절력변화는 0.23 D 증가하였고, 조절래그 변화량은 우안에서는 $0.17{\pm}0.42D$, 좌안에서는 $0.23{\pm}0.47D$(t=2.26, p=0.03) 만큼 증가하였고 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 나타내었다. 조절용이성과 상대조절력과 조절력은 VDT 작업 후에 모두 감소하는 경향을 보였으나, 순목 횟수는 증가하는 양상을 보였다. VDT 작업 후 안정피로가 33.4%, 어깨통증이 33.3%의 자각증상을 보였다. 결론: 2시간 VDT 작업 시간에 따라 조절래그는 증가하였고, 전반적인 조절기능의 능력이 감소하는 경향을 보였으며, 시각적 부담을 주는 증상으로는 안정피로가 가장 높은 자각도를 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. uane A. Anomalies of accommodation clinically considered. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1915;14(Pt 1):386-402.
  2. Rouse MW, DeLand PN, Mozayani S, Smith JP. Binocular accommodative facility testing reliability. Optom Vis Sci. 1992;69(4):314-319. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199204000-00010
  3. Kim DN. Binocular vision, 1st Ed. Seoul: Shinkwang, 2010;163-167.
  4. Dainoff MJ, Happ A, Crane P. Visual fatigue and occupational stress in VDT operators. Hum factors. 1981;23(4): 421-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088102300405
  5. Carter JB, Banister EW. Musculoskeletal problems in VDT work: a review. Ergonomics. 1994;37(10):1623-1648. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408964941
  6. Mourant RR, Lakshmanan R, Chantadisai R. Visual fatigue and cathode ray tube display terminals. Hum factors. 1981;23(5):529-540. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088102300503
  7. Knave BG, Wibom RI, Voss M, Hedstrom LD, Berggvist UO. Work with video display terminals among office employees. I. Subjective symptoms and discomfort. Scand J work Environ health. 1985;11(6):457-466. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.2200
  8. Kim HC, Woo CH, Kim JC, Shyn KH. The Investigation of the Changes of Ocular Function in VDT Workers. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 1991;32(12):1137-1144.
  9. Yoo JS, Yoon JW, Kim JH. Influence of VDT Work on Accommodative Function. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 1992; 33(7):693-697.
  10. Park CJ, Yoo JS, Kim JH. Changes of Accommodative Function in VDT Workers in Relation to Rest. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 1994;35(7):790-794.
  11. Daum KM, Good G, Tijerina L. Symptoms in video display terminal operators and the presence of small refractive errors. J Am Optom Assoc. 1988;59(9):691-697.
  12. Gobba FM, Broglia A, Sarti R, Luberto F, Cavalleri A. Visual fatigue in video display terminal operators: objective measure and relation to environmental conditions. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1988;60(2):81-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381485
  13. Luberto F, Gobba F, Broglia A. Temporary myopia and subjective symptoms in video display terminal operators. Med Lav. 1989;80(2):155-163.
  14. Tsubota K, Kaido M, Yagi Y, Fujihara T, Shimmura S. Diseases associated with ocular surface abnormalities: the importance of reflex tearing. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999; 83(1):89-91. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.83.1.89
  15. Yaginuma Y, Yamada H, Naqai H. Study of the relationship between lacrimation and blink in VDT work. Ergonomics. 1990;33(6):799-809. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139008927186
  16. Jeong Sh, Lee SY, Eu SM, Kim DH, Lee EH. Study on the Environmental Factors and Symptoms of VDT Syndrome. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2009;14(4):65-69.
  17. Jeon IC, Kim HJ, Ro JH, Lee HS, Mah KC. Analysis of clinical performance of accommodation release apparatus for improving asthenopia. Korean J Vis Sci. 2011;13(4): 279-293.
  18. Ryu GC, Park JH, Jun J, Jin MS, Chae SC. Clinical Performance Analysis of Lens for Improving VDT Syndrome. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2009;14(4):45-51.
  19. Gang MJ, Choe OM. The Investigation of the Changes of Visual Problems in VDT Workers. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2002;7(2):33-39.
  20. Seo YW, Choe YJ. Visual Problems and Refractive Error at Video Display Terminals. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 1998;3(1):75-86.
  21. Thompson HS, Hart WM, Louis St. The pupil. In: Adler's physiology of the Eye, 9th Ed. Mosby-Year Book, 1992;412-441.
  22. Shin JA. Ocular Examination, 2nd Ed. Seoul: Hanmibook, 2007;163-182.
  23. Kwon KI, Woo JY, Park MJ, Kim SR. The Change of Accommodative Function by the Direction of Eye Movements During Computer Game. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2012;17(2):177-184.
  24. Park HJ. Analysis of Correlation of Visual Function Findings. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2005;10(4):381-389.
  25. Shim HS, Shim MS, Joo SH. A Study of Accommodative Response on Emmetropia. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2006; 11(3):187-192.
  26. Bae SH, Kwak HW. Comparison between Accommodative Response Change on the Full Vision Correction and Low Vision Correction. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2012; 17(1):75-81.
  27. Cho YA, Won JS, An GJ. The Effect on the Dryness of Eye during VDT Work. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1996; 37(12):1991-1995.
  28. Sheedy JE. Vision problems at video display terminals: a survey of optometrists. J Am Optom Assoc. 1992;63(10):687-692.
  29. Ibi K, Saito S, Yaginuma Y. Experimental studies on the influence of astigmatism on eye accommodation. Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1989;93(1):28-34.
  30. Bergqvist UO, Knave BG. Eye discomfort and work with visual display terminals. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1994;20(1):27-33. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1432
  31. Collins MJ, Brown B, Bowman KJ, Caird D. Task variables and visual discomfort associated with the use of VDT's. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68(1):27-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199101000-00005