Journal of The Korean Digital Architecture Interior Association (한국디지털건축인테리어학회논문집)

Korean Digital Architecture-Interior Association (한국디지털건축·인테리어학회)
권호 표지

Analysis of trend in construction using textmining method

텍스트마이닝을 활용한 건설분야 트랜드 분석

  • Received : 2012.05.16
  • Accepted : 2012.06.04
  • Published : 2012.06.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this paper, we present new methods for identifying keywords for foresight topics that utilize the internet and textmining techniques to draw objective and quantified information that support experts' qualitative opinions and evaluations in foresight. Furthermore, by applying this fabricated procedure, we have derived keywords to analyze priorities in architectural engineering. Not much difference between qualitative methods of experts and quantitative methods such as text mining has been observed from comparison between technologies derived via qualitative method from "The Science Technology Vision" (control group). Therefore, as a quantitative tool useful for drawing keywords for foresight, textmining can supplement quantitative analysis by experts. In addition, depending on the level and type of raw data, text mining can bring better results in deriving foresight keywords. For this reason, research activities accommodating Internet search results and the development of textmining methods for analyzing current trends are in demand.

Keywords

References

  1. Byeongwon Park, 2007. Development of method and framework for Korean Technology Foresight Program, KISTEP Press
  2. Byungnam Kahng, 2009. Complex Networks Science, Jipmoon Press, Seoul
  3. C. Tsallis and M.P. de Albuquerquer, 2000 C. Tsallis and M.P. de Albuquerquer, Eur. Phys. J. B13(2000)
  4. Cornelia Daheim, 2007. Regional Foresight in Europe 2 Examples: Duesseldorf and Linz, WFS Conference Minneapolis
  5. D.J. Watts and S.H. Strogatz, 1998. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks, Nature 393 DongWon Sohn, 2002. Social network analysis, Kyungmoon Press
  6. G. Sabidussi, 1966G. The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika, 31(4) 581-603 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289527
  7. Jae-Yun Lee, 2006. A Study on the Network Generation Methods for Examining the Intellectual Structure of Knowledge Domains, Korean Society for Library and Information Science 40 333-355
  8. James A. Dator, 2002. Advancing Futures: Futures Studies in Higher Education, Westport Press
  9. Jeremy Ginsberg, Matthew H. Mohebbi, Rajan S. Patel, Lynnette Brammer, Mark S. Smolinski & Larry Brilliant, 2009. Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data, Nature 457, 1012-1014 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07634
  10. M. Faloutsos, P. Faloutsos, and C. Faloutsos, 1999. On power-law relationships of the internet topology,
  11. Martin Hilbert, Ian Miles, and Julia Othmer, 2009. Foresight tools for participative policy-making in inter-governmental processes in developing countries: Lessons learned from the eLAC Policy Priorities Delphi, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 76, Issue 7 880-896 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.01.001
  12. Mats Lindgren,Hans Bandhold, 2002. Scenario planning: The link between future and strategy, Macmillan Press
  13. Michael Marien, 2002. Future Studies in the 21st Century: A Reality-Based. View, Futures, Vol. 34 261-281 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(01)00043-X
  14. Mikko Syrjnen, Yuko Ito, Eija Ahola, 2009. Foresight for Our Future Society: Cooperative project between NISTEP(Japan) and Tekes(Finland), Tekes & NISTEP Press
  15. OECD, 2001. Governance in the 21st Century: FUTURE STUDIES, OECD Press, Paris