Journal of Information Technology Services (한국IT서비스학회지)

Korea Society of IT Services (한국IT서비스학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of EAMaturity on Information Management and Performance

EA성숙도가 정보화관리 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

  • 이동욱 (넥스젠엔씨지(주)) ;
  • 전성현 (국민대학교 경영대학 경영정보학부) ;
  • 박찬욱 (한국마사회 경영평가팀)
  • Received : 2011.09.20
  • Accepted : 2011.12.16
  • Published : 2012.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was carried out to figure out the relationship between EAmaturity, information management capacity, and information performance, and find the effect between these variables and the reciprocal causation. The study found that EAmaturity has a positive effect on information resource management and performance. In other words, the effect of input, calculation, management and utilization factors on information planning in EAmaturity showed that calculation, management and utilization factors have a significant effect on the information planning. While the effect of input, calculation, management and utilization factors on information introduction and management showed that only both calculation and utilization have a significant effect on the information management factor. It says that EAinput in EAmaturity does not play a big part in the planning stage, as well as not go through a series of process that is connected to the maturity stage by immediate field application. Consequently, EAmaturity varies from the level that EAcreates introduction and performance according to organization. This suggests that the maturity and performance can be also changed by the level that EAcreates information performance by accepting and using this capability within organization as well as the capability to introduce and fully perform the EAsystem presented in enterprise architecture framework of public sector.

Keywords

References

  1. 국방부, 국방정보화기반 기본계획, 2000.
  2. 김성근, Entetrprise Architecture의 이해, EA 전문가 양성과정 교재, 2003.
  3. 김성근, 박현주, "Enterprise Architecture의 필요성 및 추진방안", 경영ISR, 제4권, 제2호 (2002), pp.19-40.
  4. 김오우, "품질 및 환경경영 시스템의 통합형 태와 수준이 통합효과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 박사학위논문, 상지대학교, 2001.
  5. 김종원, "국방 공통운용환경 구축 프레임워크에 관한 연구", 석사학위논문, 국방대학교, 2001.
  6. 김현성, 이미정, "전자정부에서 정부간 관계(e- IGR)의 개념 및 평가에 관한 실증연구 : 중앙 -서울시의 관계를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 제39권, 제4호(2005), pp.149-173.
  7. 박병선, 양경식, 김현수, "성공적인 전사적 아키텍처 구축을 위한 위험요인에 관한 연구", 한국 IT서비스학회지, 제5권, 제3호(2006), pp.1-23.
  8. 배병렬, AMOS 구조방정식 모델링, 청람, 2007.
  9. 윤정수, 김성근, 홍정만, "공공부문의 정보기술 아키텍처 구축 방안 : 서울시 사례를 중심으로", 엔트루저널, 제3권, 제1호(2004), pp.43-49.
  10. 이승채, "인지적 관점에서의 정보시스템 요소 해석", 정보관리학회지, 제11권, 제1호(1994), pp.145-165.
  11. 이재두, "공공정보시스템 아키텍처의 인지된 효과에 관한 연구 : 품질전략과 관리 전략을 기준으로", 박사학위논문, 한국외국어대학교, 2004.
  12. 장시영, 이정섭, "IT 아키텍처 구축의 주요성 공요인 식별", 한국경영정보연구, 제12권, 제1호(2002), pp.519-528.
  13. 이태공, 박성범, 이헌중, 정보기술 아키텍처, 기한재, 2001.
  14. 장윤희, 김종철, "EA 성과에 영향을 미치는 조직특성 요인들과 EA운영조직의 역할에 관한 연구", 대한경영학회지, 제21권, 제4호(2008), pp.1569-1593.
  15. 전성현, "엔터프라이즈 아키텍처 이해 : 조직적, 기능적, 인지적 속성을 중심으로", 한국경영정보연구, 제15권, 제1호(2005), pp.137-145.
  16. 최재원, 신숙원, 오부연, 강성민, "전사적 아키 텍처의 효과적인 수립과 방안에 대한 사례 연구", 엔트루저널, 제3권, 제2호(2004), pp. 23-34.
  17. 한국전산원, 정보기술 아키텍처 사례분석을 통한 효과측정 모델 연구, 한국전산원, 2003.
  18. 한국전산원, 선도응용시범사업 평가, 한국전산원, 2002.
  19. Boynton, A. C. and R. W. Zmud, "Information Technology Planning in the 1990's : Directions for Practice and Research", MIS Quarterly, Vol.11, No.1(1987), pp.59-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/248826
  20. Burn, J. M. and C. Szeto, "A Comparison of the Views Business and Innovation Technology Management on Success Factors for Strategic Alignment", Innovation and Management, Vol.37, No.4(2000), pp.197-216.
  21. Burn, J. M., "IS Innovation and Organizational Alignment : A Professional Juggling Act", Journal of Information Technology, Vol.11, No.1(1996), pp.3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/026839696345388
  22. Cale Jr. E. G. and G. Edward, "Aligning IS and Business Strategy : A case Study", Journal of IT Management, Vol.9, No.1(1998), pp.1-9.
  23. Chan, Y. E., S. L. Huff, D. Barclay, and D. Copeland, "Business Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment", Information Systems Research, Vol.8, No.2(1997), pp.125-150. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.2.125
  24. Chan, Y. E. and S. L. Huff, Investigating Information System Strategic Alignment, Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando, Florida, (1993), pp.345-363.
  25. EADirection, Critical Success Factors for EAEffectiveness, 2007.
  26. Earl, M., "Experiences in Strategic Information Systems Planning", MIS Quarterly, Vol.17, No.1(1993), pp.1-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/249507
  27. Felix, R., A. Pischon., F. Riemenschneider, and H. Schwerdtle, Intergrierte Managementsysteme : Ansaetze zur Integration von Qualitaets, Umwelt und Arbeitssicherheit managementsysteme, IWO-Diskussionsbei trag Nr. 41., St. Gallen, 1997.
  28. GAO., Information Technology Enterprise Architecture Use across the Federal Government Can Be Improved, 2002.
  29. Giga Information Group, Giga Collaboration : Web Service vs Enterprise Architecture, 2001.
  30. GSA, Leadership Rematins Key to Agencies Making Progress on Enterprise Architecture Efforts, 2004.
  31. Gunton, C. E., The one, the three and the many : God, creation and the culture of modernity, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1993.
  32. Gupta, Y. P., J. Karimi, and T. M. Somers, "Alignment of a firm's competitive strategy and information technology management sophistication : the missing link", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 44, No.4(1997), pp.399-413. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.649870
  33. Hartog, C. and M. Herbert, "1985 Opinion Survery of MIS Managers : Key Issues", MIS Quarterly, Vol.10, No.4(1986), pp.359- 361.
  34. ISACA, CoBit Audit Guidelines, 1997.
  35. Kirsch, W. and H. Maassen, Management systeme : Planung und Kontrolle, 2nd ed., Munchen, Herrsching : Barbara Kirsch, 1990.
  36. Kovacevic, A. and N. Majluf, "Six stages of IT strategic management", Sloan Management Review, Vol34, No.4(1993), pp.77-87.
  37. Kweku, E. and H. Zbingniew, "On Information System Project Abandonment : an Exploratory study of Organizational Practices", MIS Quarterly, Vol.15, No.1(1991), pp.67-86. https://doi.org/10.2307/249437
  38. Lederer, A. L. and A. L. Mendelow, "Information Systems Planning and the Challenge of Shifting Priorities", Information and Management, Vol.24(1993), pp.319-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(93)90029-S
  39. Lederer, A. L. and A. L. Mendelow, "Coordination of information systems plans with business plans", Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.6, No.2(1986), pp.5-19.
  40. Lerderer, A. L. and V. Sethi, "The Implementation of Strategic Information Systems Planning Methodologies", MIS Quarterly, Vol.12, No.3(1988). pp.445-461. https://doi.org/10.2307/249212
  41. Marchand, D. A., J. K. William, and D. R. John, "Information Orientation : People, Technology and the Bottom Line", Sloan Management Review, Vol.41, No.1(2000), pp.69- 80.
  42. Meta Group, Enterprise Architecture Conference Proceedings, 2000.
  43. NASCIO, Enterprise Architecture Development Tool-Kit v3.0, 2004.
  44. OMB., Circular A-130 Management of Federal Information Resource, 2000.
  45. Pischon, A., Integrierte Management fuer Qualitaet. Umweltschutz und Arbeitssicherheit, Springer, Berlin. 1999.
  46. Premkumar, G. and W. R. King, "Assessing Strategic Information System Planning", Long Range Planning, Vol.24, No.5(1992), pp.41-58.
  47. Ramaprasad, A., "Cognitive process as a basis for MIS and DSS design", Management Science, Vol.33, No.2(1987), pp.139-148. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.2.139
  48. Reglin, G. L., Motivating low-achieving students : A special focus on unmotivated and underachieving African American students, Springfield, IL : Charles C. Thomas, 1993.
  49. Sabherwal, R. and P. Kirs, "The Alignment between Organizational Critical Success Factors and Information Technology Capability in Academic Institutions", Decision Sciences, Vol.25, No.2(1994), pp.301-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb01844.x
  50. Schekkerman, J., Extended Enterprise Architecture Maturity Model Support Guide Version 2.0, Institute for Enterprise Architecture Developments, 2006.
  51. Scott, S. G. and R. A. Bruce, "Determinants of innovative behavior : A part model of innovation in the workplace", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.37, No.3(1994), pp.580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
  52. Teo, T. S. H. and J. S. K. Ang, "Critical Success Factors in the Alignment of IS Plans with Business Plans", International Journal of Information Management, Vol.19, No.2 (1999), pp.173-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-4012(99)00007-9
  53. Ulrich, H., Management, Bern, Stuttgart : Haupt, 1984.
  54. USCS, United States Customer Service Enterprise Architecture Blue Print, 1999.
  55. USPTO, USPTO Technical Reference Model Case Study, 2002.
  56. Wallace, L. and M. Keil, "Software Project Risks and Their Effect on Outcomes", Communication of the ACM, Vol.47(2004), pp.68-73.
  57. Yimaki, T., "Potential Critical Success Factors for Enterprise Architecture", Journal of Enterprise Architecture, Vol.2, No.4(2006), pp.29-40.
  58. Zviran, M., "ISSPSS : A Decision Support System for Information Systems Strategic Planning", Information and Management, Vol.19(1990), pp.345-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(90)90048-M