DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Forest plot volume estimation using National Forest Inventory, Forest Type Map and Airborne LiDAR data

  • Park, Taejin (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Woo-Kyun (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Yeol (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Byun, Woo-Hyuk (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kwak, Doo-Ahn (Environmental GIS/RS Centre, Korea University) ;
  • Cui, Guishan (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Moon-Il (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Jung, Raesun (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Pujiono, Eko (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Oh, Suhyun (Department of Climate Environment, Graduate School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Korea University) ;
  • Byun, Jungyeon (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Nam, Kijun (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Cho, Hyun-Kook (Division of Forest Resources Information, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Su (Department of Forest Management, College of Forest Environmental Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Chung, Dong-Jun (National Forest Resource Inventory Center, National Forest Cooperatives Federation) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Ho (Division of Forest Resources Information, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

The importance of estimating forest volume has been emphasized by increasing interest on carbon sequestration and storage which can be converted from volume estimates. With importance of forest volume, there are growing needs for developing efficient and unbiased estimation methods for forest volume using reliable data sources such as the National Forest Inventory (NFI) and supplementary information. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a forest plot volume model using selected explanatory variables from each data type (only Forest Type Map (FTM), only airborne LiDAR and both datasets), and verify the developed models with forest plot volumes in 60 test plots with the help of the NFI dataset. In linear regression modeling, three variables (LiDAR height sum, age, and crown density class) except diameter class were selected as explanatory independent variables. These variables generated the four forest plot volume models by combining the variables of each data type. To select an optimal forest plot volume model, a statistical comparing process was performed between four models. In verification, Model no. 3 constructed by both FTM and airborne LiDAR was selected as an optimal forest plot volume model through comparing root mean square error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination $(R^2)$. The selected best performance model can predict the plot volume derived from NFI with RMSE and $R^2$ at 50.41 $(m^3)$ and 0.48, respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. Allen MP. 1997. Understanding regression analysis. New York: Plenum Press.
  2. Bachelet D, Neilson RP, Lenihan JM, Drapek RJ. 2001. Climate change effects on vegetation distribution and carbon budget in the United States. Ecosystems 4:164-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0002-7
  3. Cao MK, Prince SD, Tao B, Small J, Li K. 2005. Regional pattern and interannual variations in global terrestrial carbon uptake in response to changes in climate and atmospheric $CO_2$. Tellus 57:210-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2005.00146.x
  4. Cao MK, Prince SD, Tao B, Small J, Shao X. 2003. Response of terrestrial carbon uptake to climate interannual variability in China. Global Change Biol. 9:536-546. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00617.x
  5. Chapin FS, Matson PA, Mooney H. 2002. Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. New York: Springer.
  6. Chen Q, Gong P, Baldocchi D, Tian YQ. 2007. Estimating basal area and stem volume for individual trees from LiDAR data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 73:1355- 1365. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.73.12.1355
  7. Chung SY, Yim JS, Cho HK, Jeong JH, Kim SH, Shin MY. 2009. Estimation of forest biomass for Muju county using biomass conversion table and remote sensing data. J Kor For Soc 98:409-416 (in Korean, with English abstract).
  8. Drake JB, Dubayah RO, Clark DB, Knox RG, Blair JB, Hofton MA, Charzdon RL, Weishampel JF, Prince S. 2002. Estimation of tropical forest structural characteristics using large-footprint LiDAR. Remote Sens Environ. 79:305-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00281-4
  9. Harding DJ, Lefsky MA, Parker GG, Blair JB. 2001. Laser altimeter canopy height profiles: Methods and validation for deciduous, broadleaf forests. Remote Sens Environ. 76:283-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00210-8
  10. Kim ES, Jim KM, Kim CC, Lee SH, Kim SH. 2010a. Estimating the spatial distribution of forest stand volume in Gyenggi Province using National Forest Inventory data and Forest Type Map. J Kor For Soc. 99:827-835 (in Korean, with English abstract).
  11. Kim S. 2007. Individual tree species identification using LIDAR-derived crown structures and intensity data [Ph.D. dissertation]. Washington: University of Washington.
  12. Kim SR, Kwak DA, Lee WK, Son Y, Bae SW, Kim C, Yoo S. 2010b. Estimation of carbon storage based on individual tree in Pinus densiflora stands using aerial photograph and LiDAR data. Sci China Life Sci. 53:885-897.
  13. Korean Forest Research Institute (KFRI). 2008. Field surveying manual of 5th National Forest Inventory. Seoul: Korea Forest Research Institute (in Korean).
  14. Kwak DA, Lee WK, Lee JH, Biging GS, Gong P. 2007. Detection of individual trees and estimation of tree height using LiDAR data. J For Res 12:425-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-007-0041-9
  15. Kwak DA, Lee WK, Cho HK, Lee SH, Son Y, Kafatos M, Kim SR. 2010. Estimating stem volume and biomass of Pinus koraiensis using LiDAR data. J Plant Res. 123(4):421-432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-010-0310-0
  16. Kwak DA, Park T, Lee JY, Lee WK. 2011. Estimating stand volume from nonparametric distribution of airborne LiDAR data. Paper presented at: 11th International Conference on LiDAR Applications for Assessing Forest Ecosystems in Silvilaser; Tasmania, Australia.
  17. Leckie D, Gougeon F, Hill D, Quinn R, Armstrong L, Shreenan R. 2003. Combined high-density lidar and multispectral imagery for individual tree crown analysis. Can J Remote Sens. 29:633-649. https://doi.org/10.5589/m03-024
  18. Means JE, Acker SA, Harding DJ, Blair JB, Lefsky MA, Cohen WB, Harmon ME, McKee WA. 1999. Use of large footprint scanning airborne LiDAR to estimate forest stand characteristics in the Western Cascades of Oregon. Remote Sens Environ. 67:298-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00091-1
  19. Naesset E. 2007. Airborne laser scanning as a method in operational forest inventory: Status of accuracy assessments accomplished in Scandinavia. Scand J For Res. 22:433-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580701672147
  20. Nelson RF, Krabill W, Tonelli J. 1988. Estimating forest biomass and volume using airborne laser data. Remote Sens Environ. 24:247-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90028-4
  21. O'Brien RM. 2007. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality Quantity 41:673-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
  22. Park T, Kwak DA, Lee JY, Lee WK. 2011a. Stand level species classification and volume estimation using Li-DAR height, intensity, and ratio parameters. Paper presented at: 11th International Conference on LiDAR Applications for Assessing Forest Ecosystems in Silvilaser; Tasmania, Australia.
  23. Park T, Lee WK, Jung R, Kim MI, Kwon TH. 2011b. Application of remote sensing technology for developing REDD+ monitoring systems. J Kor For Soc. 100:315-326 (in Korean, with English abstract).
  24. Parker GG, Lefsky MA, Harding DJ. 2001. Light transmittance in forest canopies determined using airborne laser altimetry and in-canopy quantum measurements. Remote Sens Environ. 76:298-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00211-X
  25. Popescu SC, Wynne RH, Nelson RH. 2003. Measuring individual tree crown diameter with LiDAR and assessing its influence on estimating forest volume and biomass. Can J Remote Sens. 29:564-577. https://doi.org/10.5589/m03-027
  26. Running SW, Thornton PE, Nemani R, Glassy JM. 2000. Global terrestrial gross and net primary productivity from the Earth observing system. In: Sala OE, Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Howarth RW, editors. Methods in ecosystem science. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  27. Sellers PJ, Dickinson RE, Randall DA, Betts AK, Hall FG, Berry JA, Collatz GJ, Denning AS, Mooney HA, Nobre CA, Sato N, Field CB, Henderson-Sellers A. 1997. Modeling the exchanges of energy, water, and carbon between continents and the atmosphere. Science 275:502-509. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5299.502
  28. SAS Institute. 2006. SAS User Guide. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.
  29. Son YM, Lee KH, Park YK, Kim RH, Kwon SD. 2008. Management plan for absorption and emission of greenhouse gas in part of forest, Seoul of South Korea. Seoul: Korea Forest Research Institute.
  30. van Aardt J, Wynne RH, Oderwald RG. 2006. Forest volume and biomass estimation using small-footprint LiDAR distributional parameters on a per-segment basis. For Sci. 52:636-649.
  31. Yim JS, Han WS, Hwang JH, Chung SY, Cho HG, Shin MY. 2009. Estimation of forest biomass based upon satellite data. Kor J Remote Sens. 25:311-320 (in Korean, with English abstract).

Cited by

  1. LiDAR 자료를 이용한 A/R CDM 대상지 선정에 관한 연구 vol.28, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2012.28.5.10
  2. 항공 LiDAR 자료를 이용한 브루나이 열대우림의 임분단위 지상부 생체량 추정 vol.31, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2015.31.2.7
  3. Brief history of Korean national forest inventory and academic usage vol.43, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20160032
  4. Potential Lidar Height, Intensity, and Ratio Parameters for Plot Dominant Species Discrimination and Volume Estimation vol.12, pp.19, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12193266