DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison between Different Models for Alpha-particle Range Determination and a New Approach to CR-39 Detector

  • Ghazaly, M. El (Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University) ;
  • Salama, T.T. (Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University) ;
  • Khalil, E.I. (Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University) ;
  • Raouf, Kh.M. Abd El (Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University)
  • Published : 2012.08.15

Abstract

An extensive study was carried out to compare different models and a new approach for measuring the alpha-particle range in the CR-39 detector. The CR-39 samples were exposed perpendicularly to alpha particles with energies ranging from 2.5 MeV to 5.5 MeV emitted from $^{241}Am$. The CR-39 samples were etched in 7.25 N NaOH at ($70{\pm}0.5)^{\circ}C$ for different durations. Both the track diameters and the track cone lengths were measured under an optical microscope. The new approach is based on measurement of the track etch rate along the particle's trajectory as a function of the removal thickness (h). A correlation was found to exist between the removal thickness at the maximum track etch rate ($V_{Tmax}$) and the range of alpha particles in the CR-39 detector. The track etch rate data were fitted using the function $V_T$ (h) = $a_1+[a_2-a_3h]$ exp[$a_4h$]. The ranges of alpha particles were determined by setting the first order derivative of the fitting function equal to zero, where h is equal to the range of the alpha particles (R) in the CR-39 detector. Furthermore, the range of the alpha particle in the CR-39 detector was measured using the over-etched track diameter and the track cone length. The theoretical predictions of the alpha-particle ranges were calculated using the SRIM software. A well-known function, R(E) = $b_1E^{b_2}$, was used to fit the experimental results and the theoretical predictions. Experiments showed that the determination of the alpha-particle range based on the cone length model was in a good agreement with the theoretical calculations, where the discrepancy was less than that for the over-etched track diameter and the maximum track etch rate models.

Keywords

References

  1. S. A. Durrani and R. K. Bull, Solid State Nuclear Track Detection (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1987).
  2. D. Nikezic and K. N. Yu, Mater. Sci. Eng., R 46, 51 (2004), and references therein. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2004.07.003
  3. R. L. Fleischer, P. B. Price and R. M. Walker, Nuclear Tracks in Solids: Principles and Applications (University of California Press, California, 1975).
  4. M. El Ghazaly, Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids 167, 421 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/10420150.2012.678009
  5. D. Zhou, D. O'Sullivan and E. Flood, Adv. Space Res. 37, 1218 (2005).
  6. A. P. Fews and D. L. Henshaw, Phys. Med. Biol. 28, 459 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/28/5/001
  7. J. A. Frenje et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72, 854 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1323243
  8. M. El Ghazaly, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 59, 55 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.59.55
  9. L. A. Moore, S. Afr. Optom. 62, 72 (2003).
  10. M. Fromm, F. Membrey, A. El Rahamany and A. Chambaudet, Nucl. Tracks Radiat. Meas. 21, 357 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-8078(93)90230-2
  11. B. Dorschel, D. Hermsdorf, U. Reichelt, S. Starke and Y. Wang, Radiat. Meas. 37, 583 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00046-5
  12. F. M. F. Ng, K. Y. Luk, D. Nikezic and K. N. Yu, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 263, 266 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.04.147
  13. S. A. R. Al-Najjar and S. A. Durrani, Nucl. Tracks Radiat. Meas. 8, 51 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-245X(84)90054-1
  14. M. Fromm, E. M. Awad and V. Ditlov, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 226, 565 (2004).
  15. F. Vaginay, M. Fromm, D. Pusset, G. Meesen, A. Chambaudet and A. Poffijn, Radiat. Meas. 34, 123 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(01)00136-6
  16. G. Somogyi, Comput. Phys. Commun. 7, 216 (1974).
  17. G. Almasi and G. Somogyi, Atomki Kozlemenyek 23, 99 (1981).
  18. J. F. Ziegler, J. P. Biersack and U. Littmark, The Stopping and Range of Ions in Soilds (Pergamon Press, New York, 1985).
  19. K. N. Yu, C. W. Y. Yip, D. Nikezic, J. P. Y. Ho and V. S. Y. Koo, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 59, 363 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(03)00201-X
  20. A. F. Saad, A. A. El-Namrouty, S. Solyman and S. T. Atwa, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 58, 701 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.58.701
  21. K. C. C. Tse, Investigations of the Effects of UV Irradiation on the Etching Behavior of CR-39 Solid State Nuclear Track Detector (City University of Hong Kong 2007).
  22. J. F. Ziegler, SRIM-2000, http://www.srim.org, (2001).
  23. B. Dorschel, R. Bretschneider, D. Hermsdorf, K. Kadner and H. Kuehne, Radiat. Meas. 31, 103 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00117-1
  24. B. Dorschel, H. Hartmann and K. Kandner, Radiat. Meas. 26, 51 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/1350-4487(95)00270-7

Cited by

  1. Characterization of saturation of CR-39 detector at high alpha-particle fluence vol.50, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.11.010