Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회연합논문집)

The Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회지회연합회)
권호 표지

Characteristics of Aging-in-Place Oriented Groups with Middle and Old Aged in Kyungnam Area

중고령층의 지역 내 계속거주 지향 군집의 특성 분석 - 경남지역 거주자를 중심으로 -

  • Published : 2012.06.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study was to discriminate the aging-in-place orientation with middle and old aged of Kyungnam area and build on the systematic aging-in-community environment. Their aging-in-place orientation and NORC needs were highly positive. Especially NORC needs were sympathized with their independent later lives. Social services needs also were as highly positive at the well-being medical service, leisure supportive service, traffic supportive service and so on. Personal and fundamental supportive services have split at the Factor Analysis. Two groups were divided by living place, length of living place, aging-in-place orientation, NORC needs and social services needs at the Discriminant Analysis. Group 1 was older and longer and higher than group 2 at age, length of living place, aging-in-place attitudes, NORC needs and social services needs. NORC needs didn't affect directly at aging-in-place attitudes, but affected directly at social supportive services. It was recognized the outside living environment renovation was more important than indoor.

Keywords

References

  1. 김상희, 미국 중소도시 중노년층의 지역사회이미지와 옥내외 주거환경만족도를 통한 기존지역 내의 계속거주태도 및 요구도 분석 - 미조리주 컬럼비아시 거주자를 대상으로-, 대한건축학회연합논문집 제12권 제3호, 2010.09, pp.85-94
  2. 장경희, 고령사회의 삶의 질 향상 기반 구축 방안, 보건복지포럼, 한국보건사회연구원, 2011.02, pp.18-27
  3. 김선자, 서울의 고령친화도시추진전략, SDI정책 리포트, 2010.05.31 제64호, 시울시정개발연구원
  4. 이현진.박재승, Aginh in Place를 위한 노인주거 시설 선호에 관한 연구, 한국의료복시시설학회문집, 제16권 제1호, 2010, pp.55-63
  5. 오찬옥, 그룹홈과 공유주택 개념을 중심으로 본 Aging in Place를 위한 노인주거대안 개발을 위한 연구-부산광역시 단독주택 거주 노인을 중심으로-, 한국주거학회지, 제19권 제3호, 2008, pp.59-71
  6. 권현주.이수진.민병아.이연숙, Aging in Place를 지원하는 디지털 홈 계획 방향에 대한 연구, 한국실내디자인학회 학술발표대회논문집, 2007, pp.131-137
  7. 박수빈, 중노년층 요구분석에 의한 노년기 주거디자인의 기초연구, 대한건축학회논문집(계획계) 제23권 제5호, 2007, pp.49-58
  8. 김미선.이정화.이연숙, 소집단 워크샾을 통한 국내 도심 거주 노인들 의 주거환경 선호 연구, 한국생태환경학회 춘계학술발표대회논문집, 2007, pp.311-317
  9. 통계청,www.kostat.go.kr
  10. NORC Aging in Place Initiative website (http://www.norcs.com)
  11. WHO, Global Age-friendly Cities: A guide, WHO. 2007
  12. Ann Bookman, Innovative models of aging in place: Transforming our communities for an aging population, Community, Work & Family,. 11(4), 2008, pp.419-438 https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800802362334
  13. Gail Wilson, 'Old age and change in home and neighbourhood: Personal adaptability by frail older people in response to the legacies of social and economic policies', Housing Studies, 6(4), 1991, pp.263-272
  14. Robin Means, 'Community care, housing and older people: Continuity or change?', Housing Studies, 6(4), 1991, pp.273-284
  15. Tang, Fengyan and Pickard, Joseph G., 'Aging in Place or Relocation: Perceived Awareness of Community-Based Long-Term Care and Services', Journal of Housing For the Elderly, 22(4), 2008, pp.404-422
  16. Mayer, Neil S., 'Grants, Loans, and Housing Repair for the Elderly', Journal of the American Planning Association, 47(1), 1981, pp.25-34
  17. Heywood, Frances, 'Adaptation: Altering the House to Restore the Home', Housing Studies, 20(4), 2005, pp.531-547 https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030500114409
  18. S,M.Niemeyer etc, Local Housing and Service Decisions: Planning for Aging Adults in rural Communities, Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 20(4), 2006, pp.5-22
  19. WHCoA, The Booming Dynamics of Aging - from Awareness to Action-, U.S. Census Bureau, 2005
  20. G. Fernandez. etc, Components of the Residential Environment and Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the Elderly, Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 13(1), 2004, pp.25-49
  21. Wan Heet Al, 65+ In The United States: 2005. U.S. Census Bureau, 2005
  22. Golant, Stephen M., Commentary: Irrational Exuberance for the Aging in Place of Vulnerable Low-Income Older Homeowners, Journal of aging & social policy, 20(4), 2008, pp.379-397