Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society

Korean Data Analysis Society (한국자료분석학회)
권호 표지

The Mediating Effect of Continuous Learning Behavior in the Relationship Goal Orientation and Innovative Behavior

목표지향성과 혁신행동의 관계에서 지속학습활동의 매개효과

  • Ji, Sung-Ho (Dept. Business Administration of Jeju National University Graduate School) ;
  • Kang, Young-Soon (Dept. Business Administration of Jeju National University)
  • 지성호 (제주대학교 대학원 경영학과) ;
  • 강영순 (제주대학교 경상대학 경영학과)
  • Published : 2012.10.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The present study was aimed to investigate the mediation of continuous learning activity between goal orientation and innovative behavior with the employees who work for companies in the service industry in Jeju. The results of this study are follows. First, learning goal orientation and performance approach goal orientation were positively related with continuous learning activity and with innovative behavior as well. The mediating effects were found a little differently. Performance approach goal orientation had full mediating effect with continuous learning activity. Learning goal orientation was confirmed partial mediation effect with continuous learning activity. The implications of the current research were 1) mediating effect of continuous learning activity was investigated, 2) continuous learning activity was meaningful to account it for in the innovative behavior, 3) the companies which are required change and innovation are necessary to select and place the employees.

본 연구에서는 제주지역 서비스 업종 종사자를 대상으로 목표지향성과 혁신행동의 관계에서 지속학습활동의 매개효과를 검증한다. 연구결과 학습목표지향성과 수행접근목표지향성은 혁신행동과 정(+)의 관계가 있었으며, 수행회피목표지향성은 유의하지 않았다. 지속학습활동과 혁신행동의 관계는 유의하였으며, 지속학습활동의 매개효과는 학습목표지향성과 부분매개 효과가 수행접근목표지향성과는 완전 매개효과가 있었다. 본 연구는 목표지향성과 혁신행동의 매커니즘을 지속학습활동을 통해 검증하였다는 측면에서 의미가 있으며, 이를 통해 조직구성원들의 혁신행동을 수행하는데 있어 지속학습활동의 중요성을 설명한다. 또한 변화와 혁신을 수행하는 기업에 있어 조직구성원의 선발과 배치에 있어 실무적 시사점을 제시하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 고수일 (2011). 혁신행동에 대한 변혁적.거래적 리더십의 효과; 목표지향성의 매개역할, 조직과 인사관리연구, 35(1), 1-21.
  2. 공혜원, 전병준 (2011). 감정부조화가 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향: 조직자아존중감 및 직무스트레스의 매개효과를 중심으로, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 13(1), 477-490.
  3. 김문주, 윤정구 (2012). 학습조직의 세 가지 메커니즘: 지식 공유, 생산적인 담론, 그리고 정체성 공유가 팀 효과성에 미치는 영향, 조직과 인사관리연구, 36(1), 31-65.
  4. 김솔이, 유태용 (2010). 핵심자기평가와 지속학습활동 간의 관계: 목표지향성의 매개효과와 상사지원의 조절효과, 한국심리학회: 산업 및 조직, 23(1), 131-154.
  5. 김성훈, 강영순 (2011). 리더-부하의 교환관계 질, 부하저항, 과업수행간의 구조적 관계, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 13(6), 3121-3134.
  6. 김아영 (2011). 학업동기 이론 연구와 적용, 학지사.
  7. 김정수, 유태용 (2009). 팀원의 변화저항과 지속학습활동 간 관계에서 팀 모니터링, 팀 지원행동, 변혁적 리더십의 영향, 한국심리학회: 산업 및 조직, 22(3), 345-371.
  8. 김태홍, 한태영 (2009). 적응성과 및 지속적 학습활동에 대한 학습목표성향, 실책관리풍토 및 변화지향적 팀리더십의 영향, 인사.조직연구, 17(3), 117-159.
  9. 박노윤 (2009). 지원인식, 목표지향성 및 종업원 행동; 비정규직 종업원을 대상으로, 인사관리연구, 33(4), 1-34.
  10. 배병렬 (2011). Amos 19 구조방정식 모델링, 도서출판 청람.
  11. 이도화, 김미숙 (2008). 조직구성원의 목표성향이 창의적 과업성과에 미치는 영향, 인사.조직연구, 16(2), 63-94.
  12. 이문선, 강영순 (2003). 창의성과 혁신행동의 관계와 집단특성의 조절효과, 인사관리연구, 27(1), 251-271.
  13. 정동섭 (2006). 지식공유의 선행요인과 지식공유가 혁신행동에 미치는 영향, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 8(5), 2063-2080.
  14. 정동섭, 정석찬, 정문섭 (2011). 사회적 자본과 기업혁신역량의 관계, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 13(4), 2125-2136.
  15. 정성훈, 유태용 (2008). 피드백 추구를 위한 모니터링과 묻기의 선행변인과 결과변인에 관한 연구, 한국심리학회: 산업 및 조직, 21(2), 285-312.
  16. 최병권, 전재욱, 원지현, 문형구 (2011). 목표지향성, 상사부하 교환관계, 부하 신뢰성 인식이 상사의 부하로부터의 부정적 피드백 추구행동에 미치는 영향, 인사.조직연구, 19(4), 93-142.
  17. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
  18. Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation Princeton, NJ: Van Norstrand.
  19. Baron, M. R., Kenny, A. D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  20. Birdi, K., Allan, C., Warr, P. (1997). Correlates and perceived outcomes of four types of employee development activity, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 845-857. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.845
  21. Brett, J. F., VandeWalle, D. (1999). Goal orientation and goal content as predictors of performance in a training program, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 863-873. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.863
  22. Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 67, 26-48. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0063
  23. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., Whiteman, J. A., Kilcullen, R. N. (2000). Examination of the relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 835-847. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.835
  24. Chung, D. S. (2006). The Influence of the Knowledge Sharing and Its Antecedent Factors on the Innovative Behavior, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 8, 2063-2080.
  25. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning, American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
  26. Dweck, C. S., Legett, E. I. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality, Psychological Review, 95, 256-273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
  27. Elliot, A. J., Church, M, A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach Ana avoidance achievement motivation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218
  28. Elliot, A. J., Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5
  29. Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and avoidance achievement motivation, Journal of educational Psychology, 91, 549-563. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.549
  30. Ford, J. K., Smith, E. M., Weissbein, D. A., Gully, S. M., Salas, E. (1998). Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.218
  31. Han, T. Y. (2003). Multilevel approach to individual and team adaptive performance, Doctoral dissertation. State University of New York.
  32. Helmreich, R., Spence, J. T. (1978). The work and family orientation questionnaire(WORO): An objective instrument to assess components of achievement motivation and attitudes toward family and career, JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 8, 35.
  33. Janssen, O., Prins, J. (2007). Goal orientations and the seeking of different types of feedback information, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X103410
  34. London, M., Mone, E. M. (1999). Continuous learning. In D. R. Ilgen, & D. E. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implication for staffing, motivation, and development, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 119-153.
  35. London, M., Smither, W. J. (1999). Empowered self-development and continuous learning, Human Resouce Management, 38, 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199921)38:1<3::AID-HRM2>3.0.CO;2-M
  36. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality, New York: Oxford University Press.
  37. McClland, D. C., Atkinson, J. R., Clark, R. A., Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Cenury-Crofts.
  38. Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomolocical net, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 128-150. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.128
  39. Podsakoff, M. P., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  40. Podsakoff, M. P., Organ, W. D. (1986). Self-Reports in organizational research: problems and prospects, Journal of Management, 12, 69-82.
  41. Porath, C. L., Bateman, T. S. (2006). Self-regulation: From goal orientation to job performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 185-192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.185
  42. Reeve, J. (2005). Understanding Motivation and Emotion, Wiley.
  43. Scott, S. G., Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovation behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace, Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
  44. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models, Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312. https://doi.org/10.2307/270723
  45. VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 8, 995-1015.
  46. VandeWalle, D., Brown, S. P., Cron, W. L., Slocum, Jr. J. W. (1999). The influence of goal orientation and self-regulation tactics on sales performance: a longitudinal field test, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.249
  47. VandeWalle, D., Cummings, L. L. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 390-400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.390