Journal of the Korean Medical Association (대한의사협회지)

Korean Medical Association (대한의사협회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improving quality of healthcare in Korea

한국 의료의 질 향상 방안

  • 박형욱 (단국대학교 의과대학 인문사회의학교실)
  • Published : 2012.10.10
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Korea has achieved a remarkable expansion in health coverage at modest costs relative to other Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. Hospitals are more accessible and equipped with more advanced medical technologies than in most other OECD countries. OECD Reviews of Health Care Quality seek to support the development of better policies to improve the quality of healthcare. In 2012, a report on Korea presented best practices and offered recommendations for improvement in the Korean health system. Korea's health care system needs to shift its focus from simply supporting an ever-continuing expansion of acute care services to quality of healthcare. First, Korea needs to strengthen the focus of governance to the quality of healthcare by establishing HIRA as an institutional champion for quality. Second, Korea must strengthen primary healthcare because in Korea it is woefully underdeveloped today. Third, Korea must use financing to drive improvements in quality of care. In reality, HIRA has used its power over healthcare providers to force them to accept financial constraints; it has not supported quality of all healthcare sectors. Without structural changes allowing for independent judgment on the quality at HIRA, NECA is more suitable for ensuring quality for all healthcare sectors. As suggested by the OECD report, Korea must strengthen primary healthcare by restoring patients' trust in health professionals. In using financing to drive improvements in quality of healthcare, Pay for Performance may be helpful, but that must be driven on a voluntary basis and with a great financial incentive.

Keywords

References

  1. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD health care quality review: Korea. Assessment and recommendations [Internet]. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2012 [cited 2012 Sep 25]. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/korea/49818570.pdf.
  2. World Health Organization. Quality of care: a process for making strategic choices in health systems [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006 [cited 2012 Sep 25]. Available from: http://www.who.int/management/quality/assurance/QualityCare_B.Def.pdf.
  3. Raleigh V, Foot C. Getting the measure of quality: opportunities and challenges [Internet]. London: The King's Fund; 2010 [cited 2012 Sep 25]. Available from: http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/Getting-the-measure-of-quality-Veena-Raleigh-Catherine-Foot-The-Kings-Fund-January-2010.pdf.
  4. Stevanovic V, Fujisawa R. Performance of systems of cancer care in OECD countries: exploration of the relation between resources, process quality, governance and survival in patients with breast, cervical, colorectal and lung cancers [Internet]. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [cited 2012 Sep 25]. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/health/healthpoliciesanddata/48098832.pdf.
  5. Fricker J. How are we doing: the question that could help drive up standards across Europe's cancer services. Cancer World 2012;March/April:58-62.
  6. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Health at a glance 2011: OECD indicators [Internet]. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2011 [cited 2012 Sep 25]. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/health/healthpoliciesanddata/49105858.pdf.
  7. National Health Insurance Act, No. 11141, Article 41-3 (Dec 31, 2011).
  8. Supreme Court Full Panel Decision 2010, Du27639, 27646 (Jun 18, 2012).
  9. Choi SW. Health insurance benefits have failed to reflect quality in health care. Doctors News. 2012 Jul 25.
  10. Health and Medical Service Technology Promotion Act, No. 10996, Article 21 (Apr 4 2011).
  11. Dixon A, Khachatryan A, Wallace A, Peckham S, Boyce T, Gillam S. Impact of Quality and Outcomes Framework on health inequalities [Internet]. London: The King's Fund; 2011 [cited 2012 Sep 25]. Available from: http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/impact-quality-and-outcomes-frameworkhealth-inequalities.
  12. Attorney-At-Law Act, No. 10922, Article 45-1 (Jul 25, 2011).
  13. Epstein AM. Pay for performance at the tipping point. N Engl J Med 2007;356:515-517.
  14. Ryan A, Blustein J. Making the best of hospital pay for performance. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1557-1559.
  15. Werner RM, Kolstad JT, Stuart EA, Polsky D. The effect of payfor-performance in hospitals: lessons for quality improvement. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011;30:690-698.
  16. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. About the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence [cited 2012 Sep 25]. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/qof/qof.jsp.
  17. Borowitz M. Sustainability of health system: is P4P an alternative? Health Insur Rev Assess Serv 2011;5:21-26.
  18. Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
  19. World Health Organization. Conceptual framework for the international classification for patient safety: final technical report [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009 [cited 2012 Sep 25]. Available from: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/taxonomy/icps_full_report.pdf.
  20. Lee SI. Uneasy truths about patient safety: National Evidencebased Healthcare Collaborating Agency. Evid Value 2012;18:4-5.
  21. Panesar SS, Cleary K, Sheikh A. Reflections on the National Patient Safety Agency's database of medical errors. J R Soc Med 2009;102:256-258.
  22. National Patient Safety Agency. Report a patient safety incident [Internet]. London: National Patient Safety Agency [cited 2012 Sep 22]. Available from: http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/report-a-patient-safety-incident.
  23. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005 [Internet]. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005 [cited 2012 Sep 22]. Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/psoact.htm.
  24. Act on Patient Safety in the Danish Health Care System [Internet]. Hvidovre: Dansk Selskab for Patientsikkerhed; 2003 [cited 2012 Sep 22]. Available from: http://patientsikkerhed.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/Patientsikkerhed/Loven/Act_on_Patient_Safety.pdf.
  25. Constitution of the Republic of Korea, No. 10, Article 12-2 (Sep 25, 1987).

Cited by

  1. The current status and directions of healthcare policy in Korea vol.55, pp.10, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.10.930
  2. 2014 한국의 보건의료의 상대적 위치와 추이: 경제협력개발기구 국가와 비교 vol.27, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4332/kjhpa.2017.27.1.88
  3. 2015년 한국 보건의료의 상대적 위치와 추이: 경제협력개발기구 국가와 비교 vol.28, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4332/kjhpa.2018.28.1.98
  4. 간호대학생의 전공만족도와 비판적 사고성향, 간호사이미지간의 관계 vol.5, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.17703/jcct.2019.5.2.263