Journal of People, Plants, and Environment (인간식물환경학회지)

Society For People, Plants, And Environment (인간식물환경학회)
권호 표지

A Scheme Proposal for Barrier Free Investigation in Maintenance of Urban Park in Korea for Japanese Cases

한국 도시공원의 베리어 프리 정비사업의 정책제언을 위한 일본 도시공원 정비사례에 대한 평가

  • Lee, Jie Woong (Department of Horticulture, Graduate School of Chiba University) ;
  • Yeom, Sung Jin (Department of Horticulture, Graduate School of Chiba University)
  • 이지웅 (치바대학교 대학원 원예학과) ;
  • 염성진 (치바대학교 대학원 원예학과)
  • Published : 2012.06.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, we investigate effective conditions for barrier-free in urban park. Through the park users' evaluation of urban parks which were appointed by Japan's New barrier-free law, we sampled 219 urban park users. With a statistical analysis of correlation and one way analysis of variance, the results were obtained as follows: first, the evaluation of the users' satisfaction of the park's facility was high. However, restroom was relatively low. The height and the information contents of the Bulletin board in the evaluation were contradictory between the two stratum of users who were handicapped or non-handicap. Secondly, The two stratums had different correlation factors in satisfaction. Thirdly Even though the space maintained by guideline had a variety of user's complaints and requirements for each facility. Finally, The maintain of facility were needed with consider a variety of users and their behavior patterns can choose from a variety requires and more detailed and can accommodate the needs of users of the criteria may be needed to compensate.

본 연구는 일본의 신법에 의해 시설정비가 된 실제 도시공원의 이용자들을 대상으로 실시한 시설에 대한 평가를 바탕으로 제도상의 문제점이나 개선안 등, 도시공원에 있어서의 유효한 BF의 적용 조건을 파악하기 위해 실시하였다. 조사를 통해 얻은 자료를 분석한 결과를 정리하면 다음과 같다. 첫째로 정비된 시설에 대한 평가 및 만족도는 높았지만 화장실은 상대적으로 낮았다. 그리고 게시판의 높이와 정보내용에 있어서 두 계층 간에 상반된 평가가 나타났다. 둘째로 유는 도로의 폭, 계단, 경사로, 화장실의 출입구 넓이, 내부 넓이, 세면대, 변기, 유구시설의 모든 항목, 게시판의 높이가 만족도와 양의 상관관계를 가졌으며 무는 출입구 폭, 도로의 폭, 계단, 경사로, 화장실의 문, 세면대, 변기, 유구의 시야 이외의 모든 항목, 게시판의 내용이 만족도와 양의 상관관계를 가졌다. 셋째로 기준에 의해 정비 된 공간임에도 불구하고 각 시설에 대해 이용자들의 다양한 불만과 요구사항이 존재했다.

Keywords

References

  1. Gotoh, K.S and I.C. Kameya. 1999. A barrier free investigation for urban parks in osaka prefecture. Reports of the Faculty of Engineering, Nagasaki University 29(53):247-254.
  2. Han, B.H., J.H. Bae, I.S. Ahn, and K.J. Lee. 2009. A trail plan for at-risk walkers in mountainous urban park -A focus on umyen nature park-. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 36(6):22-33.
  3. Hirakawa, T.K. 2007. Livable city for disabled people: a case study of Beppu city. Memoirs of the Faculty of Human Development, University of Toyama 1(2):19-26.
  4. Ida, T.A. 2000. Design guidance by the - universal design technique made with the park for all. 1th ed. Tokyo: Shikazima.
  5. Im, S.B., W.J. Yang, and J.W. Sunu. 1986. A study on the improvement of children's playground in apartment comlex. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 14(2):43-68.
  6. Kamata, M.R. 2007. New law for accessible transport and its guideline. The Transportation and Logistics Conference 16:51-52.
  7. Kang, B.K., K.J. Park, H.J. Chung, J.H. Kang, and J.H. Lee. 2007. A study on the planning of the urban park with analyse of barrier free urban parks in Japan. Architectural Institude of Korea Plan 23(12):95-102.
  8. Kawauchi, Y.H. 2001. Universal design, for a question to barrier-free. 4th ed. Kyoto:Gakugei.
  9. Kim, Y.H. 2011. Environment sound are not an obstacle for the implementation of the design of public facilities beep. Korean society for noise and vibration engineering Monthly 21(3):24-31.
  10. Kimura, K.H., K.S. Shimizu, Y.H. Ito, and S.K. Go. 2000. Evaluation method of pedestrian area accessibility for wheelchairs. Japan Society of Civil Engineers. 17:973-980.
  11. Lee, K.C and K.W. Kim. 2001. Urban park and open space :A study on development priority of undeveloped urban neighborhood park in case of daegu metropolitan City. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 12(1):80-91.
  12. Lee, S.L., J.S. Ahn, and S.H. Chun. 2011. Analysis of environmental correlates with walking among older urban adults. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 39(2):65-72.
  13. Lee, T.J. 2006. Barrier-free status and implications of Chiba, Japan. International Social Security Trends summer 138-144.
  14. Nagamatu, Y.H., Y.K. Iwabuchi, and E.K. Nagasawa. 2002. The utilization of a park, and requests for park-facilities from visually handicapped persons. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture 65(5):727-730.
  15. Nishimura, M.J and T.Z. Asazawa. 2005. Issues related to barrier-free city park based on the new barrier-free law. Parks and Open Space Research Institute Report pp.39-49.
  16. Osakaya, Y.Y. 1999. A study on actual condition of barrier free of 18 paris in Muroran city. Journal of Architecture and Building science 7:139-144.
  17. Park, S.J. 1998. The study on a barrier free in neighborhood parks for a physically challenged person. MS Thesis, University of Kyunghee, Seoul.
  18. Ryu, J.K. 2011. Acoustic barrier-free preparation for the aging society. Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering Monthly 21(3):16-23.
  19. Suzuki. K.I. 2006. From barrier-free to universal design; Review of the traffic barrier-free law. Issue brief 526:1-9.
  20. Wakisaka, R.I. 2008. A action for barrier-free and universal design in urban park. Architecture opinion 15(2):28-31.
  21. Yamamoto, N.O. 2011. Wooden playground equipments - A concept of safety standard. Wood Preservation 37(1):2-11. https://doi.org/10.5990/jwpa.37.2
  22. Yamasita, A.H., Y.C. Oya, K.S. Tateishi, and M.K. Sonoda. 2000. A study on the accessibility design of the district park for the wheel chair users : A study on the accessibility design for the recreational faclities part1. Summaries of technical papers of Annual Meeting Architectural Institute of Japan. Urban planning, building economics and housing problems. F-1: 579-580.
  23. Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2011. Maintenance of disability discrimination law and the other conflicting laws, the study of revision to sub-law of convenience promotion pp.325-326.
  24. Seoul city. 2010. Disabled facilities in Seoul installation manual. pp.101.
  25. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism. 2008. Guideline for promoting barrier-free transport and facilities for elderly and disabled on the city parks. pp.1.
  26. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism. 2002. Guideline for maintaining safety of playground equipment in urban park.