DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Unit Pollution Load on Highway runoff

고속도로 노면 강우유출 오염부하 원단위 산정

  • 강희만 (한국도로로공사 도로교통기술원) ;
  • 이두진 (K-water연구원 상하수도연구소) ;
  • 배우근 (한양대학교 건설환경공학과)
  • Published : 2012.02.15

Abstract

Impervious surface increase due to urbanization, one of the leading causes of pavement increased the runoff coefficient, peak flow, and reducing the infiltration flow and thereby causing flooding and river erosion is occurring in aquatic ecosystems are known to impair. This study aimed to classify use type of detailed land into the road, reststop, tollgates and etc. focused on major domestic highways, to understand the characteristics of rainfall runoff pollutants and to calculate applicable unit pollution load. Because of high runoff coefficient and short travel time to drainage. first flush occurred clearly. Average EMCs of runoff in the highway was investigated as TSS 108.47 mg / L, COD 28.16 mg / L, BOD 13.61 mg / L, TN 6.38 mg / L, TP 0.03 mg / L, Cu 118.17 ${\mu}g$ / L, Pb 345.3 ${\mu}g$ / L, Zn 349.47 ${\mu}g$ / L. Unit pollution loads calculated by detailed land use area of highways based on average annual rainfall, EMCs, applicable basin areas and etc. were 46.6 kg/km2/day of BOD, 1.4 kg/km2/day of TP, 8.81 kg / km2/day of TN and these were BOD 50.8%, TP 66.7%, TN 64.4%in comparison of the unit pollution loads which applies fallow land standards of the TMDL(Total Maximum Daily Load). It was considered that discharged loads can be excessively calculated in case highway non-point management plans based on unit pollution load of the current land standard.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립환경과학원 (2006) 비점오염부하량 평가기법 연구(I) : 도로 및 대지 원단위(안)을 중심으로.
  2. 강혜진, 이의상 (1999) 고속도로 요금소 근무자의 근무환경 개선에 관한 연구, 한국도로공사.
  3. 환경부 (2010) 하수도시설기준.
  4. USEPA (1994) Nonpoint sources pollution control program, U.S. EPA, Report 841-F-94-005.
  5. Driscoll, E., Shelley, P., and Strecker, E., (1995) Pollutant Loadings and Impacts from Highway Stormwater Runoff, Volume I, Federal Highway Administration, Washington D.C.,
  6. Schueler, T. R., (1987) Controlling urban runoff: A practical manual for planning and designing urban BMPs, Washington D.C.
  7. Kayhanian, M., Suverkropp, C., Ruby, A., and Tsay, K., (2007) Characterization and prediction of highway runoff constituent event mean concentration, Journal of Environmental Management, 85, pp.279-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.09.024
  8. Bertand-Krajewski, J., Chebbo, G., and Saget, A., (1998) Distribution of pollutant mass vs volume in stormwater discharges and the first flush phenomenon, Wat. Res., 328, pp.2341-2356.
  9. Charbeneau, R.J., and Barrett, M.E., (1998) Evaluation of methods for estimating stormwater pollutant loads, J. of Water Environmental Research, 70, pp.1295-1302. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143098X123679
  10. Kim, L.H., et al., (2005) Prediction of event mean concentration and first flush effect using mass interpolation washoff model for highway runoff, Conference proceedings of 6th International Conference on Diffuse Pollution
  11. Kayhanian, M., and Stenstrom, M.K., (2008) First-Flush Characterization for Stormwater Treatment, Stormwater, March-April, (www.stormh2o.com/march-april-2008/pollutants-run-off-4.aspx).

Cited by

  1. Enhancement of Estimation Method on the Land T-P Pollutant Load in TMDLs Using L-THIA vol.36, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4491/KSEE.2014.36.3.162
  2. Characteristics of stormwter runoff from highways with unit traffic volume vol.18, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2016.18.3.275
  3. Determination of NPS Pollutant Unit Loads from Different Landuses vol.13, pp.13, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137193