DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shake Table Tests of Steel Embedded Composite Columns Under Moderate Near-Fault Motion

  • Chung, Young-Soo (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Shim, Chang-Su (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Hong, Hyun-Ki (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chung-Ang University)
  • Received : 2012.01.20
  • Accepted : 2012.11.29
  • Published : 2012.12.31

Abstract

Shaking table tests were conducted on steel-embedded composite columns with core structural steel on near fault ground motion (NFGM) to investigate their seismic behavior. Four composite columns and one reinforced concrete (RC) column with diameters of 400 mm and heights of 1400 mm were tested on a shake table, and one specimen was studied with a pseudo-dynamic test. A sliding steel frame, called the inertial force rig, was designed and implemented to completely support the inertial mass of the column and the shaking table system. The composite column with a higher steel ratio required more volumetric confinement steel in the plastic hinge region. For the steel embedded composite columns with an axial steel ratio of less than 2%, The same amount of confining steel as in the normal reinforced concrete columns was sufficient to obtain the required ductility for the composite columns with low steel ratio. Composite columns with an embedded steel tube at the center showed better displacement ductility than RC columns with similar steel ratios, but showed smaller energy absorption capacity. The effect of the lap splice in a composite column was not significant because the spliced reinforcing bars had a lower area than RC columns with a 50% lap splice. The shake table test specimen showed much less ductility than the pseudo-dynamic test specimen and more energy dissipation capability, while the maximum capacity of the composite column was the same for the different test methods.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Chung-Ang University

References

  1. ACI 318-08 (2007). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI318M-08) and commentary. American Concrete Institute.
  2. AISC 360-05 (2005). Specification for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 360-05, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, IL.
  3. Chen C. C., Li, J. M., and Weng, C. C. (2005). "Experimental behavior and strength of concrete-encased composite beam-columns with T-shaped steel section under cyclic loading." Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 61, pp. 863-881.
  4. Chung, W. J., Yun, C. B., Kim, N. S., and Seo, J. W. (1999). "Shaking table and pseudodynamic tests for the evaluation of the seismic performance of base-isolated structures." Engineering Structures, 21(4), pp. 365-379.
  5. Chung, Y. S., Park, C. K., and Meyer, C. (2008). "Residual seismic performance of reinforced concrete bridge piers after moderate earthquakes." ACI Structural Journal, 105(1), pp. 87-95.
  6. El-Tawil, S. and Deierlein, G. G. (1999). "Strength and ductility of concrete encased composite columns." Journal of Structural Engineering, 125(9), pp. 1009-1019.
  7. El-Tawil, S., Sanz-Picon, C. F., and Deierlein, G. G. (1995). "Evaluation of ACI 318 and AISC (LRFD) strength provisions for composite beam-columns." Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 34, pp. 103-123.
  8. EN 1994-1 (2004). Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures. Part 1.1: General rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium.
  9. Eurocode 8 (2002). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 2. Bridges. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium.
  10. Jacobs, W. P. and Goverdhan, A. V. (2008). "Review and comparison of encased composite steel-concrete column detailing requirements." Proc. Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete VI, ASCE.
  11. Kato, T. and Takahashi, Y. (2000). "Earthquake design and construction of tall composite bridge piers." Proc. 12WCEE 0899, pp. 1-8.
  12. Kim, J. H. and Kim, J. K. (2006). "Modeling of near fault ground motion due to moderate magnitude earthquakes in stable continental regions." Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 10(3), pp. 101-111.
  13. Kleinschmitt, J. (2005). "Zur Tradlastoptimierung von rechteckigen Verbundsttzen aus einbetonierten I_Profilen." Stahlbau, 74(5), pp. 339-347 (in Germany).
  14. Korea Road & Transportation Association (2010). Korea bridge design codes. Korea Road & Transportation Association, Seoul, Korea (in Korean).
  15. Melek, M., Wallace, J. W., and Conte, J. P. (2003). "Experimental assessment of columns with short lap splices subjected to cyclic load." PEER Report 2003/04, University of California, Berkeley.
  16. Shim, C. S., Chung, Y. S., Park, J. H., and Park, C. Y. (2007). "Seismic performance evaluation of circular composite columns by shaking table test." Journal of Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 11(5), pp. 71-87.
  17. Shim, C. S., Chung, Y. S., and Han, J.-H. (2008). "Cyclic response of concrete-encased composite columns with low steel ratio." Structures and Buildings, Proc. of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 161(SB2), pp. 77-89.
  18. Shim, C. S., Chung, Y. S., and Yoon, J.-Y. (2011). "Cyclic behavior of prefabricated circular composite columns with low steel ratio." Engineering Structures, 33, pp. 2525-2534.
  19. Somerville, P. G. (2002). "Characterizing near-fault ground motion for the design and evaluation of bridge." Proc. 3rd National Conference and Workshop on Bridges and Highways, Portland, Oregon.
  20. Somerville, P. G., Smith, N. F., and Graves, R. W. (1997). "Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity." Seismological Research Letters, 68(1), pp. 199-222.
  21. Phan, V., Saiid Saiidi, M., Anderson, J., and Ghasemi, H. (2007). "Near-fault ground motion effects on reinforced concrete bridge columns." Journal of Structural Engineering, 10(7), pp. 982-989.

Cited by

  1. Analysis on Extension Length of Shape Steel in Transfer Columns of SRC-RC Hybrid Structures vol.18, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0038-6