DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Safety evaluation of agricultural reservoir embankment according to backside extension

후면 덧쌓기에 따른 농업용 저수지 제체의 안정성 평가

  • Lee, Dal-Won (Dept. of Agricultural and Rural Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Noh, Jae-Jin (Dept. of Agricutural Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • 이달원 (충남대학교 지역환경토목학과) ;
  • 노재진 (충남대학교 대학원)
  • Received : 2012.02.10
  • Accepted : 2012.03.23
  • Published : 2012.03.31

Abstract

This study was carried out for safety evaluation, the practical application and improvement of design method of the agricultural reservoir embankment according to backside extension. Seepage analysis, slope stability analysis and finite element analysis were performed for steady state and transient conditions. Also, the pore water pressure, seepage quantity, safety factor and stress-strain behavior according to high water level and rapid drawdown were compared and analyzed. The pore water pressure at contact region between backside extension and old embankment was kept high after rapid drawdown. Therefore, backside extension is recommended that design method is required to be improved and reinforced more than the others raising embankment. The hydraulic gradients before and after backside extension showed high value at the base of the core, but they showed stable state at the upstream slope and downstream slope. The seepage quantity per 1 day and the leakage per 100 m for the steady state and transient conditions appeared to be safe against the piping. The safety factor of slope stability showed high at the steady state, and transient conditions did not show differences depending on the rapid drawdown. The safety factor was appeared high at the upstream slope before backside extension and downstream slope after extension. The excess pore water pressure for steady state and transient conditions showed negative(-) at the upstream slope, it was small at the downstream slope. The mean effective stress (p') showed high at the base of the core and to be wild distribution after the extension. The displacement after extension showed 0.02-0.06 m in the upstream slope, the maximum shear strain after extension was smaller than that before extension.

Keywords

References

  1. Fell R, Wan CF, Cyganiewicz J, Foster MA. 2003. Time for development of internal erosion and piping in embankment dams. J. Geotech. and Geoenviron. Eng. 129(4): 307-314. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:4(307)
  2. Fell R, Macgregor P, Stapledon D, Bell G. 2005. Geotechnical engineering of dam. Balkema AA, pp. 393-439.
  3. Foster MA, Fell R. 1999. A framework for estimating the probability of failure of embankment dams by internal erosion and piping using event three methods, UNICIV Rep. NO. R-377. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Univ. of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
  4. Foster MA, Fell R, Spannagle M. 2000. The statics of embankment dams failures and accidents. Canadian Geotech. J. 37: 1000-1024. https://doi.org/10.1139/t00-030
  5. Foster MA, Fell R. 2001. Assessing embankment dam filters that do not safety design criteria. J. Geotech. and Geoenviron. Eng. 127(5): 398-407. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:5(398)
  6. Fredlund DG, Xing A. 1994. Equations for the soil-water characteristic curve. Canadian Geotechnical J. 31: 521-532. https://doi.org/10.1139/t94-061
  7. GEO-SLOPE. 2007. SEEP/W 2007. GEO-SLOPE International Ltd.
  8. GEO-SLOPE.2007. SLOPE/W 2007. GEO-SLOPE International Ltd.
  9. GEO-SLOPE.2007. SIGMA/W 2007.GEO-SLOPE International Ltd.
  10. Jung HS. 1989. An experimental study on piping failure of earth embankment. J. of Korean Geotechnical Society 5(4): 17-26. [in Korean]
  11. Kim MH, Lee DW. 2009. Safety evaluations of reservoir embankment by instrument system. J. of Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers 50(2): 37-44. [in Korean]
  12. Korea Rural Community Corporation (KRC). 2003-2005. Report of Monitoring System for Disaster Prevention of Agricultural Structure. [in Korean]
  13. Korea Rural Community Corporation (KRC). 2005. Guidelines for Precision Safety Inspections of Dam. [in Korean]
  14. Kwon HM, Kim CY, Park YH, Chung CK, Kim MM. 2004. Experimental investigation of seepage properties on weathered residual soils. J. of the Korean Geotechnical Society 20(1): 75-82. [in Korean]
  15. Lee DW, Oh BH. 2003. Stability evaluation methods of agricultural reservoir by field monitoring. J. of Agri. Sci. Chungnam Nat'l Univ., 30(2): 164-174. [in Korean]
  16. Lee DW, Lee KS, Lee YH. 2011. Seepage analysis of agricultural reservoir due to raising embankment, J. of Agricultural Science 38(3): 493-504. [in Korean]
  17. Min HG, Lee DW. 2008. Prediction of excess pore water pressure of reservoir embankment on soft ground. J. of Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers 50(2): 37-44. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2008.50.2.037
  18. MLTM (Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs). 2005. Guidelines for Dam Design. [in Korean]
  19. MLTM (Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs). 2011. The 4 Major Rivers Restoration. Assessed in http://4rivers.go.kr. [in Korean]
  20. Van Genuchten MT. 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America J. 44: 892-898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x

Cited by

  1. The safety behavior of agricultural reservoirs due to raising the embankment vol.40, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7744/cnujas.2013.40.3.243