DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of stereotypes for principal controls in passenger cars

승용 자동차 주요 조종장치의 스테레오타입 조사

  • Kee, Do-Hyung (Dept. of Industrial & Management Engineering, Keimyung University)
  • 기도형 (계명대학교 경영공학과)
  • Received : 2012.04.19
  • Accepted : 2012.06.12
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

The aims of this study are to investigate stereotypes of motion-direction and real motion-directions for seven principal controls in passenger cars, and to compare the stereotypes and real motion-directions for the controls. The stereotypes were obtained by using questionnaire survey, in which 385 subjects participated. The real motion-direction data were gathered for 64 passenger cars including RVs and SUVs. The results showed that while there are dominant motion-directions for head light, door key and door lock controls, dominant motion-directions are not found for other controls investigated in this study. The stereotypes of motion-directions for seven controls obtained in this study were much different from those of the real data. Furthermore, the stereotypes for wiper, head light and high beam controls based on the questionnaire survey were opposite to the real motion-directions.

Keywords

References

  1. Chan, W.H. and Chan, A.H.S.(2003), "Movement compatibility for rotary control and circular display-Computer simulated test and real hardware test." Applied Ergonomics, 34:61-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00075-3
  2. Chan, W.H. and Chan, A.H.S.(2007) "Strength reversibility of movement stereotypes for lever control and circular display." International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37:233-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2006.10.023
  3. Chapanis, A. and Lindenbaum, L.E.(1959), "A reaction-time study of four control-display linkage." Human Factors, 1:1-7.
  4. Courtney, A.J.(1986), "Chinese population stereotypes: Color associations." Human Factors, 28(1):97-99.
  5. Courtney, A.J.(1988), "Chinese response preferences for display-control relationships." Human Factors, 30(3):367-372.
  6. Fitts, P.M.(1951), Engineering psychology and equipment design, in Stevens, S.S.(ed), Handbook of experimental psychology, Wiley, New York, 1287-1340.
  7. Hoffmann, E.R.(2009), "Do paper-and-pencil tests give an accurate measure of stereotype strength?" International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39:904-9120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2009.06.001
  8. Hsu, S-H. and Peng, Y.(1993), "Control/display relationship of the four-burner stove: A reexamination." Human Factors, 35(4):745-749.
  9. http://blog.naver.com/mltm2008?Redirect= Log&logNo=130102609903
  10. http://stat.mltm.go.kr/portal/cafe/statView.do.
  11. Jeong, B-Y. and Lee, J-U.(2001), "Movement compatibility of ON/OFF controls." IE Interfaces, 14(3):302-309.
  12. Jung, H.S. and Jung, H.S.(2003), "User expectations and preferences of door lock control devices." Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 29(4):283-291.
  13. Jung, H.S.(2004), "User expectations regarding the water faucet operation." IE Interfaces, 17(1):104-112.
  14. Kee, D.(2011a), "Stereotype for control-display relationship of four-burner range for Korean." Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 30(3):1-6. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2011.30.1.1
  15. Kee, D.(2011b), "Stereotype and effective cues for burner-control relationship of four-stove range." Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 37(2):118-123. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2011.37.2.118
  16. Loveless, N.E.(1962), "Direction-of-motion stereotypes: A review." Ergonomics, 5:357-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140136208930601
  17. Ray, R.D. and Ray, W.D.(1979), "An analysis of domestic cooker control design." Ergonomics, 22:1243-1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140137908924698
  18. Shinar, D. and Acton, M.B.(1978), "Control-display relationships on the four-burner range: Population stereotypes versus standard." Human Factors, 20:13-17.
  19. Wu, S-P.(1997), "Further studies on the spatial compatibility of four control-display linkages." International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19:353-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00014-5

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Paper-Pencil and Hardware Tests for Investigating Stereotypes for Controls of Passenger Cars vol.15, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12812/ksms.2013.15.2.63
  2. Test-Retest Reliability of Paper-Pencil Test for Investigating Stereotypes of Controls of Passenger Cars vol.17, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12812/ksms.2015.17.2.201