DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluating New Track Construction Costs of Two Different Options: Conventional Trains vs. Tilting Trains

  • Received : 2012.06.20
  • Accepted : 2012.06.25
  • Published : 2013.06.30

Abstract

Infrastructure costs could be greatly reduced if the need for bridges and tunnels was reduced, or if the line could be shortened. Tilting trains might be a less costly alternative to building new tracks with large curve radii, because tilting trains can negotiate tighter curves without having to decrease their speeds. Tracks built for tilting trains would be cheaper, as they require fewer bridges and tunnels. This paper compares the construction costs of two different options for the new Dodam-Yeoncheong section on the Central line, which includes 148.65 km of new electrified double-track with a design speed of 250 km/h. The first option is to straighten the high-speed line. The second option is to build a line with small radii curves and run tilting trains on the line. In the first option, tunnels would account for about 51% of the new section. In comparison, the second option would have shorter curves and fewer tunnels and bridges which would reduce construction costs. Furthermore, alignment modifications could be made to several segments on the straight line, making the most of the existing roadbed. The analysis concluded that the line suited to tilting trains would be 95.7 million USD cheaper to build the straight route. That is a savings of 2.8% of the total project cost. However, this option would increase the total travel time of the route by 1.2 minutes, which means it is not necessarily the best choice.

Keywords

References

  1. Froidh, O. (2008). "Perspectives for a future high-speed train in the Swedish domestic travel market," Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 16, Issue 4, July, pp.268-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.09.005
  2. Profillidis, V. A. (2000). "Railway Engineering," Ashgate publishing Ltd.
  3. Persson, R. (2008). "Tilting trains - Technology, benefits and motion sickness," Licentiate thesis in railway technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
  4. Kufver, B. and Forstberg, J. (2004). "Tracks for tilting trains," European Commission Competitive and Sustainable Growth Programme - Fast and Comfortable Trains (FACT), Deliverable D3.
  5. Rho, H. L., Kim, G. S. and Han, S. H. (2012). "The Infrastructure Costs of New Tracks for Tilting Trains compared with Non-Tilting Trains", Paper presented in J. Pombo, (Editor), "Proceedings of the First International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance", Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 184, doi:10.4203/ccp.98.184.

Cited by

  1. Feasibility Analysis on Ground-level Stations and Wireless Power Transfer Technology Applications for Monorail System vol.7, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7782/IJR.2014.7.3.071
  2. A Study on the Possible Running Time Estimation of Tilting Train on the Gyeongbu line vol.64, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5370/KIEEP.2015.64.4.199