DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Marginal fit evaluation of 3 unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by rapid prototyping method

쾌속 조형 기술을 이용하여 제작된 3본 고정성 보철물의 적합도 평가

  • Kim, Ki-Baek (Dept. of health science specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate school, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Hong (Dept. of health science specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate school, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Woong-Chul (Dept. of health science specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate school, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Hae-Young (Dept. of health science specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate school, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hwan (Dept. of health science specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate school, Korea University)
  • 김기백 (고려대학교 일반대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공) ;
  • 김재홍 (고려대학교 일반대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공) ;
  • 김웅철 (고려대학교 일반대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공) ;
  • 김혜영 (고려대학교 일반대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공) ;
  • 김지환 (고려대학교 일반대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공)
  • Received : 2012.04.19
  • Accepted : 2012.06.26
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose this study was to evaluate the marginal fitness of metal copings fabricated using rapid prototyping method and to compare the fitness with copings by conventional method. Then clinical availability of fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated using rapid prototyping method shall be confirmed based on marginal fitness. Methods: Ten same cases of3 unit FDPs epoxy models (abutment teeth 14 and 16) were manufactured. Each of ten epoxy models were scanned by 3shape D-700 scanner to be designed by experienced technician, and photopolymer 3 unit FDPs were fabricated using rapid prototyping methodand fabricated using Lost wax technique (LW) with same models. Marginal fitness of 3 unit FDPs were measured by silicone replica technique. T-test of independent sample for statistical analysis was executed with SPSS 12.0K for Windows. (${\alpha}$=.05) Results: Significantly higher mean (SD) marginal fitness (P<.000) were observed in the RP group $(95.9(18.0){\mu}m$ compared to the conventionally LW group $(80.1(13.8){\mu}m$. Conclusion: Marginal fitness of LW group showed excellent rather than RP group. However marginal fitness of 3 unit FDPs fabricated by RP method did not get out of clinical allowance value range significantly to allow clinical application.

Keywords

References

  1. Al Wazzan KA, Al-Nazzawi AA. Marginal and internaladaption of commercially pure titanium andtitanium-aluminium-vanadium alloy cast restorations. JContemp Dent Pract 2007; 8: 19-26.
  2. Anusavice KJ. Phillips'science of dentalmaterials. 11th ed. Phialdelphia: W.B. Saunders, 565, 584-585, 2003.
  3. Coli P, Karlsson S. Fit of a new pressure-sintered zirconium dioxide coping. Int J Prosthodont, 17, 59-64, 2004.
  4. Fonseca JC, Henriques GE, Sobrinho LC, de Goes MF. Stress-relieving and porcelain firing cycle influence on marginal fit of commercially pure titanium and titanium aluminumvanadium copings. 19, 686-691, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00014-9
  5. Harris IR, Wickens JL. A comparison of the fit of sparkeroded titanium copings and cast gold alloy copings.Int J Prosthodont, 7, 348-355, 1994.
  6. Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR,Wilder AD Jr, Roberson TM. The clinicalperformance of CAD-CAM-generatedceramic inlays: a four-year study. J Am DentAssoc, 127, 1171-1181, 1996.
  7. Jemt T, Back T, Petersson A. Precision of CNC-milled titanium frameworks for implanttreatment in the edentulous jaw. Int JProsthodont, 12, 209-215, 1999.
  8. Jesus Suarez M, Lozano JF, Paz Salodo M, Martinez F.Marginal fit of titanium metal-ceramic crowns. Int JProsthodont, 18, 390-391, 2005.
  9. McLean JM, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cementfilm thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J, 131, 107-111, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  10. Pallesen U, van Dijken JW. An 8-year evaluationof sintered ceramic and glass ceramicinlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAMsystem.Eur J Oral Sci, 108, 239-246, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.108003239.x
  11. Rekow D. Computer-aided design andmanufacturing in dentistry: a reviewof the state of the art. J Prosthet Dent, 58, 512-6, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90285-X
  12. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J.Contemporary fixed prosthodontics.4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 409, 599, 606-608, 2006.
  13. Shokry TE, Attia M, Mosledh I, Elhosary M, Hamza T, Shen C. Effect of metal selection and porcelain firing on the marginal accuracy of titanium-based metal ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent, 103, 45-53, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60216-X
  14. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jamelson L, Wozniak W. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont, 10, 478-484, 1997.
  15. Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hammerle CHF. Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci, 116, 272-279, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00527.x
  16. Witkowski S, Komine F, Gerds T. Marginal accuracy oftitanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAMtechniques. J Prosthet Dent, 96, 47-52, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.013

Cited by

  1. 치과용 캐드캠 시스템으로 제작된 고정성 보철물의 품질 분석 vol.36, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2014.36.3.159
  2. 치과용 캐드캠 시스템으로 제작된 고정성 보철물의 품질 분석 vol.36, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2014.36.3.159
  3. 치과 캐드캠 시스템의 가공 방식에 따른 금속 코핑의 적합도 비교 vol.15, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.17135/jdhs.2015.15.1.12
  4. 적층가공방식을 이용한 열가압 세라믹 라미네이트 비니어의 적합도: 3차원 분석 vol.39, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2017.39.3.137
  5. 핸드스캐닝 작업 방법에 따라 표준 모델 변형이 작업 정밀도에 미치는 정밀스캔에 관한 연구 vol.19, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2018.19.4.197
  6. 치과 CAD/CAM 시스템 보유 현황 및 사용 만족도 조사 연구 vol.42, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2020.42.1.45