DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Home-based Virtual Reality on Upper Extremity Motor Function for Stroke - An Experimenter Blind Case Study

가정-중심 가상현실이 만성뇌졸중환자의 팔 운동기능에 미치는 영향 - 실험자 맹검 단일실험연구

  • Lee, Jung-Ah (Department of Motor and Cognitive Rehabilitation, Korea National Rehabilitation Center Research Institute) ;
  • Hwang, Su-Jin (Department of Physical Therapy, Nambu University) ;
  • Song, Chiang-Soon (Department of Occupational Therapy, Chunnam-Techno College)
  • 이정아 (국립재활원 재활연구소 운동인지재활과) ;
  • 황수진 (남부대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 송창순 (전남과학대학 작업치료과)
  • Received : 2012.02.29
  • Accepted : 2012.07.12
  • Published : 2012.07.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the home-based virtual reality (VR) on upper extremity motor function in hemiparetic stroke patients. Two matched subjects with left hemiplegia were volunteered to participate in this study. One subject received the home-based VR whereas the other subject recovered a modified home-based constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). Both interventions were given for 4 hours x 5 times a week for 4 weeks. Outcome measures included Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). The VR-trained subject showed considerable improvement in all the tested motor functions when compared with the home-based CIMT. Specifically, the FMA measure demonstrated that the VR subject showed 17% enhancement whereas the CIMT subject showed 5% increase. Similarly, Amount of Use (AOU) and Quality of Movement (QOM) of the MAL scores of the VR subject showed 40% and 20% increase whereas the CIMT subject showed 0% and 20% increase, respectively. The WMFT scores of the VR subject and CIMT subject showed 20% increase. Our home-based VR was effective in upper extremity motor recovery of chronic hemiparetic patients even when compared with the well-established CIMT approach in stroke victims.

본 연구의 목적은 만성 편마비 뇌졸중 환자를 대상으로 상지 운동기능 회복을 위하여 적용한 가상현실 가정운동프로그램의 가능성을 알아보기 위함이다. 만성 뇌졸중 환자 2명을 대상으로, 한 명의 참여자는 가상현실운동프로그램을 가정운동프로그램으로 처방하여 실행하였고, 다른 한 명의 참여자는 강제-유도운동치료를 가정운동프로그램으로 처방하여 실행하였다. 치료기간은 4주간으로 1주일에 총, 5회로 1회에 4시간씩 실시하였다. 평가는 뇌졸중 기능회복평가(Fugl-Meyer Assessment; FMA), 운동활동척도검사(Motor Activity Log, MAL), 그리고 울프운동기능검사(Wolf Motor Function Test; WMFT)를 이용하였다. 가상현실 운동프로그램을 가정운동프로그램으로 실시한 대상자가 모든 운동기능평가에서 상당한 기능적 회복을 보여주었다. 특히, FMA 점수는 가상현실프로그램을 사용한 대상자는 17% 향상된 반면, 강제유도운동치료를 가정운동프로그램으로 실시한 대상자는 5% 증가하였다. 또한, MAL 점수의 환측 상지를 이용하는 양(Amount of Use; AOU)와 움직임의 질(Quality of Movement; QOM)점수에서도 가정중심 가상현실 프로그램을 이용한 대상자가 각 40%, 20% 향상된 반면, 강제유도운동치료를 받은 대상자는 각각 0%, 20% 증가하였다. 가상현실 프로그램을 사용한 대상자와 강제유도운동치료를 받은 대상자의 WMFT 점수가 모두 20%증가하였다. 본 연구결과, 만성 편마비 뇌졸중 환자의 상지 운동 기능 향상을 목적으로 가정운동프로그램을 설계할 때 가상현실 운동프로그램이 강제-유도운동치료보다 더욱 효과적인 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. A. S. Merians, D. Jack, R. Boian, et al, Virtual reality-augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Phys Ther, 82, 898-915, 2002.
  2. S. J. Page, S. A. Sisto, & P. Levine, Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stroke. American J Physl Med Rehab, 81, 870-875, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-200211000-00013
  3. S. C. Deluca, K. Echols, S. L. Raney, & E. Taub, Pediatric costraint-induced movement therapy for a young child with cerebral palsy: Two episodes of care. Phys Ther, 83(11), 1003-1013, 2003.
  4. S. H. You, S. H. Jang, SH,. Y. H. Kim, et al, Virtual reality-induced cortical reorganization and associated locomotor recovery in chronic stroke. Stroke, 36, 1166-1171, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000162715.43417.91
  5. J. M. Andre, J. P. Didier, J. Paysant, Functional motor amnesia instroke and learned non-use phenomenon. J Rehabil Med, 36, 138-140, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970410026107
  6. S. Lennon, & A. Ashburn, The Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: A focus group study of the experienced physiotherapist's perspective. Disabil Rehab, 22(15), 665-674, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382800445461
  7. J. S. Knutson, T. Z. Hisel, M, Y, Harley, et al, A novel functional electrical stimulation treatment for recovery of hand function in hemiplegia: 12-week pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23(1), 17-25, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308317577
  8. F. Eser, G. Yavuzer, D. Karakus, et al, The effect of balance training on motor recovery and ambulation after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. European J Phys Rehab Med, 44(1), 19-25, 2008.
  9. S. J. Page, S. A. Sisto, R. Levine, R. E. McGrath, Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 14-18, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00481-7
  10. E. Taub, G. Uswatte, R. Pidikiti, Constraint-induced movement therapy: A new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation. J Rehab Resear Develop, 36(3), 237-251, 1999.
  11. H. J. Freund, M. Jeannerod, M. Hallett, & R Leiguarda. Higher-order motor disorders: from neuroanatory and neurobiology to clinical neurology. Chapter 25: Cortical plasticity and motor disorders, pp. 455-473, New York, MD: Oxford University Press Inc, 2005.
  12. J Broeren, L. Claesson, D. Goude, et al. Virtual rehabilitation in an activity centre for community dwelling persons with stroke: The possibilities of 3-dimensional computer games. Cerebrovasc Dis, 26(3), 289-296, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1159/000149576
  13. A. Henderson, N. Korner-Bitensky, & M. Levin, Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil, 14(2), 52-61, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1402-52
  14. S. Subramaniam, L. A. Knaut, C. Beaudoin, et al, Virtual reality environments for post stroke arm rehabilitation, J Neuroeng Rehabil, 22(4), 20, 2007.
  15. J. H. Van Der Lee, H. Beckerman, G. J. Lankhorst, L. M. Bouter, The responsiveness of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med, 33, 110-113. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/165019701750165916
  16. A. R. Fugl-Meyer, L. Jääskö, Leyman et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. II. Incidence, mortality, and vocational return in Goteborg, Sweden with a review of the literature, Scand J Rehabil Med, 7, 13-31, 1975.
  17. A. Shumway-Cook, M. H. Woollacott, Motor Control: Translating research into clinical practice 3rd ed. pp. 175-230, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007.
  18. G. Uswatte, E. Taub, D. Morris, et al, The motor activity log-28: Assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology, 67, 1189-1194, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000238164.90657.c2
  19. E. Taub, N. E. Miller, T. A. Novack, et al, Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 174(4), 347-354, 1993.
  20. S. L. Wolf, D. E. Lecraw, L. A. Barton, et al, Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol, 104(2), 125-132, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-4886(89)80005-6
  21. M. K. Holden, T. A. Dyar L. Dayan-Cimadoro, Telerehabilitation using a virtual environment improves upper extremity function in patients with stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 15(1), 36-42, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2007.891388
  22. M. Rydmark, J. Broeren, R. Pascher, Stroke rehabilitation at home using virtual reality haptics and telemedicine. Stud Health Technol Inform, 85, 434-437, 2002.
  23. J. L. Alberts, A. J. Butler, S. L. Wolf, The effects of constraint-induced therapy on precision grip: a preliminary study, Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 18(4), 250-258, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968304271370
  24. E. Taub, G. Uswatte, V. W. Mark, et al. The learned nonuse phenomenon: Implications for rehabilitation. Eura Medicpphys. 42(3), 241-256, 2006.

Cited by

  1. Rehabilitation robotics for the upper extremity: review with new directions for orthopaedic disorders vol.12, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2016.1269211