DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

THE ASSESSMENT OF NOISE IN THE PEDIATRIC DENTAL CLINICS

소아치과 진료실에서 발생하는 소음 평가

  • Kwon, Bo-Min (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Ji-Hyun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Shin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Tae-Sung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 권보민 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이지현 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김신 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 정태성 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2012.06.05
  • Accepted : 2012.08.13
  • Published : 2012.08.31

Abstract

Dental professionals are exposed to various occupational risks, among which the problem of hearing damage has been newly revealed. There have been some researches reporting that noise occurring in a dental office exceeds the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) Standards. Especially, the pediatric dentists are repeatedly exposed to an additional noise source called the crying sound of children in addition to all kinds of noises from dental instruments. Accordingly, this study intended to investigate the noise environment likely to affect pediatric dentists and to examine the possibility of resultant hearing damages. The level of noise was measured respectively, when various dental instruments (ultrasonic scaler, high-speed handpiece, low-speed handpiece) are operated, when children are crying, and when both occasions take place simultaneously (from the distance of 30 cm) with a portable noise meter. And the daily duration of pediatric dentists exposed to the noise environment was surveyed. The results were compared with the standard value of noise threshold of NIOSH, OSHA, and that of hearing damage of CRA News letter respectively. Considering the intensity and exposure time, the noise environment of pediatric dentists exceeds the allowable noise threshold values. Even only one exposure to crying child was likely to lead to permanent hearing damage. Comparatively, pediatric dentists have a higher risk for occupational hearing damages, and some active measures are thought highly desirable to minimize it.

치과의사는 감염, 알레르기, 시력장애 등 다양한 직업적 위험에 노출되어 있으며, 그 중에서도 비교적 최근 들어 새롭게 제기된 문제가 청력손상이다. 치과 진료실에서 발생하는 소음이 작업장 소음 기준을 초과한다는 조사 결과가 발표된 바 있고, 특히 소아치과 의사는 각종 치과 소음에 더하여 어린이의 울음소리라는 부가적 소음원에도 일상적으로 노출되고 있다. 본 연구는 소아치과 의사에게 영향을 미칠 수 있는 소음 환경에 대해 조사하고, 이에 따른 청력 손상 가능성을 고찰해 볼 목적으로 시행되었다. 휴대용 소음계를 이용하여, 각종 치과용 기구, 어린이의 울음소리, 양자가 동시에 발생할 때의 소음 크기를 각각 측정하고, 소아치과 의사가 소음 환경에 노출되는 시간을 설문을 통해 조사하였다. 이 결과를 National Institute for Safety and Health(NIOSH) 및 Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)의 소음 역치 기준, CRA News letter의 청력 손상을 유발하는 소음 기준과 각각 비교하였다. 그 결과, 소아치과 의사가 노출된 소음 환경은, 강도와 노출 시간을 고려했을 때 허용된 작업장 소음 기준을 초과하며, 어린이의 울음소리는 한 번의 노출로도 영구적 청력 손상을 야기할 수 있는 수준으로 나타났다. 따라서 일반 치과의사와 비교하여 소아치과 의사는 직업적 청력 손상의 위험성이 더 높으며, 이를 최소화하기 위한 적극적인 대책이 필요하다는 결론을 내릴 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery : Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery(2nd). Ilchokak, Seoul, 690-697, 2002.
  2. Phaneuf R, H tu R : An epidemiological perspective of the cuases of hearing loss among industrial workers. J Otolaryngol, 19:31-40, 1990.
  3. Suter AH, Von Gierke HE : Noise and public policy. Ear Hear, 8:188-191, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198708000-00002
  4. Kim KC : Difficulty in managing the behavior and time required for treating the pedodontic patients in association with their age. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 21:469-485, 1994.
  5. Hyson, J M : The air turbine and hearing loss. Are dentists at risk?. J Am Dent Assoc, 133:1639-1642, 2002. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0113
  6. Garner, Federman J, Johnson A : Noise induced hearing loss in the dental environment : An audiologist's perspective. J Georgia Dent Assoc, 17-19, 2002.
  7. Lehto T U, Laurikainen, E T, et al. : Hearing of dentists in the long run: A 15-year follow-up study. Comm Dent and Oral Epidemol, 17:207-211, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1989.tb00613.x
  8. Merrell, H B, Claggett K : Noise pollution and hearing loss in the dental office. The Dental Assistant, 61:6-9, 1992.
  9. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry : Operative Dentistry 3rd Edition. shin-heung international, Seoul, 163, 2006.
  10. Noise in dental environment & its relationship to hearing loss. CRA Newsletter, 27:2-4, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.2003.tb00707.x
  11. Choi NK, Jeong BC , Yang KH : Effects of sedative drugs for management in children. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 29:304-312, 2002.
  12. Gullikson J S : Tinnitus and the dentist. J Oregon Dent, 47:8-9, 1978.
  13. Dobie RA : Head and Neck surgery-Otolaryngology. Lippincott-Raven Publ, Philadelphia, 2153-2163, 1998.
  14. Saunders JC, Dear SP, Schneider ME : The anatomical consequences of acoustic injury: a review and tutorial. J Acoust Soc Am, 78:833-860, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392915
  15. Feuerstein J F : Handbook of Clinical Audiology (5th). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 569, 2002.
  16. Melnick W : Handbook of Clinical Audiology(3rd). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 726, 1985.
  17. Morarasu C, Burlui V, Borta C, et al. : The evaluation of sound level in dental practice. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat IASi, 105:785-9, 2001.
  18. Coles RRA, Hoare NH : Noise-induced hearing loss and the dentist. Brit Dent J, 159:209-218, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805687

Cited by

  1. Factors Affecting the Psychology of Pediatric Patients vol.44, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2017.44.3.384