Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology (한국환경생태학회지)

Korean Society of Environment and Ecology (한국환경생태학회)
권호 표지

Comparison of Biomass by Forest Fire Type and Recovery at Samcheuk-si, Gangwon-do, Korea

산불 유형별 식생회복정도에 따른 현존생물량 비교

  • Lim, Seok-Hwa (Division of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kongju Nat'l Univ.) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Sup (Division of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kongju Nat'l Univ.) ;
  • Shin, Jin-Ho (Division of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kongju Nat'l Univ.) ;
  • Bang, Je-Yong (Faculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Seoul Women's Univ.) ;
  • Yang, Keum-Chul (Division of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kongju Nat'l Univ.)
  • 임석화 (공주대학교 건설환경공학부) ;
  • 김정섭 (공주대학교 건설환경공학부) ;
  • 신진호 (공주대학교 건설환경공학부) ;
  • 방제용 (서울여자대학교 환경생명과학부) ;
  • 양금철 (공주대학교 건설환경공학부)
  • Received : 2012.03.20
  • Accepted : 2012.07.06
  • Published : 2012.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study has compared the different types of forest fires(unburned, crown fire, ground fire) and the degree of vegetation recovery at Samcheuk-si, Gangwon-do by assessing the biomass and net primary production from July 2007 through July 2010. The research showed that the average biomass of unburned site(Un), crown fire site(C-1), crown fire site(C-3), ground fire site(G-2) were $181.20{\pm}5.39$, $62.04{\pm}4.38$, $131.09{\pm}14.38$, $63.39{\pm}2.72ton{\cdot}ha^{-1}$, respectively. And the research showed that the average net primary production of unburned site(Un), crown fire site(C-1), crown fire site(C-3), ground fire site(G-2) were $4.17{\pm}0.56$, $3.27{\pm}1.56$, $11.51{\pm}0.53$, $2.10{\pm}0.31ton{\cdot}ha^{-1}{\cdot}yr^{-1}$, respectively. Quercus mongolica $DH_{10}$(Diameter at the 10cm tree height) growth rate at each plot was compared to the crown fire site(C-1) in the annual average $1.21{\pm}0.55mm{\cdot}yr^{-1}$ at the speed of the fastest growth follows; showed crown fire site(C-3), ground fire site(G-2), unburned site(Un) appeared in the order. And that showed the growth rate of height was highest in the $15.43{\pm}4.57cm{\cdot}yr^{-1}$ at crown fire site(C-3), then the crown fire site(C-1), and ground fire site(G-2), and lowest in the unburned site(Un).

본 연구에서는 2007년 7월부터 2010년 7월까지 4년 동안 강원도 삼척시에서 산불 유형(비산불조사구: 산불피해를 입지 않은 지역, 수관화: 산불에 의해 교목의 수관까지 전소한 지역, 지표화: 산불에 의해 교목의 수관 하층만 전소한 지역)과 산불 후 식생의 재생정도(산불피해 후 식피의 재생정도가 1/3이하인 지역: 1, 산불피해 후 식피의 재생정도가 1/3 ~ 2/3인 지역: 2, 산불피해 후 식피의 재생정도가 2/3이상인 지역: 3)에 따른 현존생물량과 순생산량을 비교하였다. 비산불조사구(Un), 수관화 발생 조사구(C-1, C-3), 지표화 발생 조사구(G-2)에서 4년간 평균 현존생물량은 각각 $181.20{\pm}5.39$, $62.04{\pm}4.38$, $131.09{\pm}14.83$, $63.39{\pm}2.72ton{\cdot}ha^{-1}$로 나타났다. 비산불조사구, 수관화 발생 조사구(C-1, C-3), 지표화 발생 조사구(G-2)에서 4년간 평균 순생산량은 각각 $4.17{\pm}0.56$, $3.27{\pm}1.56$, $11.51{\pm}0.53$, $2.10{\pm}0.31ton{\cdot}ha^{-1}{\cdot}yr^{-1}$로 나타났다. 각 조사구의 공통수종인 신갈나무의 DH_{10}$(지상으로부터 10cm 높이에서의 직경, mm)의 생장률을 비교하여 보면 수관화 발생 조사구(C-1)에서 $1.21{\pm}0.55mm{\cdot}yr^{-1}$로 가장 높았으며 수관화 발생조사구(C-3), 지표화 발생 조사구(G-2), 비산불조사구(Un)의 순으로 나타났다. 수고생장률로 비교하였을 때 수관화 발생 조사구(C-3)에서 $15.43{\pm}4.57cm{\cdot}yr^{-1}$로 가장 높았으며 수관화 발생 조사구(C-1), 지표화 발생 조사구(G-2), 비산불조사구(Un)의 순으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chandler, C., P. Cheney, P. Thomas, L. Trabaud and D. Williams (1983) Fire in forestry. Vol. I .Forest fire behavior and effects. Johnwiley & Sons, NewYork, 450pp.
  2. Choung, Y.(2000) Natural regeneration after forest fire, and restoration policy. In the ecological role of fire. The Ecological Society of Korea International Symposium: 1-26.
  3. Choung, Y., B.C. Lee, J.H. Cho, K.S. Lee, I.S. Jang, S.H. Kim, S.K. Hong, H.C. Jung and H.L. Choung(2004) Forest responses to the large-scale east coast fires in Korea. Ecological Research 19(1): 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1703.2003.00607.x
  4. Hiratsuka, M., T. Toma, R. Diana, D. Hadriyanto and Y. Morikawa (2006) Biomass recovery of naturally regenerated vegetation after the 1998 forest fire in east Kalimantan, Indonesia. Japan agricultural research quarterly 40(3): 277-282.
  5. Hong, S.K. and N. Nakagoshi(1996) Biomass changes of a human-influenced pine forest and forest management in agricultural landscape system. Korean J. Ecol 19(4): 305-320.
  6. Hozurni, K.(1963) Allometry in higher plants. 2. Allometry in trees, especially on the allometry relating DBH. Seicho 2: 1-18.
  7. Ji, D.H.(2005) Biomass of Pinus densiflora, Quercus variabilis and Quercus acutissima in Geum-Gang Recreational Forest. M. thesis, Univ. of Chungnam, Daejeon, Korea, pp. 17-26. (in Korean with English abstract)
  8. Johnson, F.L. and P.G. Risser(1974) Biomass, annual net primary production and dynamics of six mineral elements in a post oak-black oak forest. Ecology 55: 1,246-1,258. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935453
  9. Kim, J.H. and S.M. Yoon(1972) Studies of the productivity and the productive structure of forests II. Comparison between the productivity of Pinus densiflora and of Quercus mongolica Stands located near Choon-Chun City. The botanical society of Korea 15: 71-78. (in Korean with English abstract)
  10. Kim, J.S. and K.C. Yang(2012) Comparison of litter production and nutrient returned to forest floor according to forest fire type and recovery. Korean society of environment and ecology 26(1):67-73. (in Korean with English abstract)
  11. Kim, J.S.(1995) Biomass and distribution of nitrogen and phosphorus for Pinus rigida, Larix leptolepis and Quercus serrata stands in Yang pyeong. M. thesis, Univ. of Korea, Seoul, Korea, pp. 57-76. (in Korean with English abstract)
  12. Kim, J.S.(2011) The comparison of biomass production and nutrient distribution according to forest fire type and recovery degree. M. thesis, Univ. of Kongju, Chungnam, Korea, pp. 14-20. (in Korean with English abstract)
  13. Kira, T. and T. Shidei(1967) Primary production and turnover of organic matter in different forest ecosystems of the western Pacific. Jap J Ecol 17: 70-87.
  14. Kittredge, J.(1944) Estimation of the amount of foliage on trees and stands. Journal of Forestry 42: 905-912.
  15. Lee, C.S. and S.K. Hong(1998) Changes of landscape pattern and vegetation structure in Rural Area Disturbed by Fire. Korean J. Eco. 21(4): 389-399. (in Korean with English abstract)
  16. Lee, D.K. and K.C. Kwon(2006) Biomass and annual net production of Quercus mongolica stands in Pyungchang and Jecheon areas. Journal of Korean forest society 95(3): 309-315. (in Korean with English abstract)
  17. Lee, K.S. and Y.S. Choung(1999) Comparison of nutrient budget on the planting revegetation site with natural revegetation site in Kosung area disturbed by fire. Journal of east coastal research 1: 137-153.
  18. Lee, K.S., Y.S. Choung, S.C. Kim, S.S. Shin, C.H. Ro and S.D. Park(2004) Development of vegetation structure after forest fire in the east coastal region, Korea. Korean J. Ecol 27(2): 99-106. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2004.27.2.099
  19. Lee, S.W.(1985) Biomass and net primary productivity of Pinus densiflora natural ecosystem in Kangwondo, Korea. Journal of Korean forest society 71: 74-81. (in Korean with English abstract)
  20. Lieth, H.(1973) Primary production: Terrestrial ecosystems. Human Ecology 1: 302-303.
  21. Mun, H.T. and Y.S. Choung(1996) Effects of forest fire on soil nutrients in pine forests in Kosong, Kangwon Province. Korean J. Eco. 19(5): 375-383. (in Korean with English abstract)
  22. Nakagoshi, N., K. Nehira and F. Takahashi(1987) The role of fire in pine forest of japan. In L. Trabaud(ed.), The role od fire in ecological systems. SPB Academic publishing, Hague, pp. 91-119.
  23. Namgung, J.(2010) Production and nutrient cycling in Quercus variabilis forest at Mt. Worak. Doctoral thesis, Univ. of Kongju, Chungnam, Korea, pp. 25-31 (in Korean with English abstract)
  24. Odum, E.P.(1971) Fundamentals of production. A source of error in estimating woodland production, energy flow and mineral cycling. Oikos 14: 148-153.
  25. Park, G.S. and M.J. Lee and H.K. Song(2002) Effects of Forest Fire on Herb Layer Development and Chemical Properties of Soil. Korean society of environment and ecology 26(1): 67-73. (in Korean with English abstract)
  26. Shidei, T.(1960) Studies on the productivity of the forest I. Essential needle-leaved forests on Hokkaido. Kokusaku Pulp. Industry Co., Tokyo, 99pp.
  27. Skre, O., F.E. Wielgolaski and B. Moe(1998) Biomass and chemical composition of common forest plants in response to fire in western Norway. Journal of Vegetation Science 9(4): 501-510. https://doi.org/10.2307/3237265
  28. Slik, J.W., C.S. Bernard, M. Beek, F.C. Breman and K.A. Eichhorn(2008) Tree diversity, composition, forest structure and aboveground biomass dynamics after single and repeated fire in a Bornean rain forest. Springer Science and Business Media 158(3): 579-588.
  29. Waring, R.H. and W.H. Schlesinger(1985) Forest ecosystems; Concept and Management. Academic press, New York, 304pp.
  30. Whittaker, R.H. and P.L. Marks(1975) Methods of assessing terrestrial productivity. In primary productivity of the biosphere(Lieth H, Whittaker RL, eds). Springer, New York, pp. 55-118.
  31. Yu, X., Y. Pang, D. Zhuang and X. Hou(2004) Forest fire disturbance and its effect on forest biomass in Daxinganling region. Interbational geoscience and remote sensing symposium 4: 2,310-2,313.