DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of SNP Variation and Distribution in Indigenous Ethiopian and Korean Cattle (Hanwoo) Populations

  • Edea, Zewdu (International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)) ;
  • Dadi, Hailu (Department of Animal Biotechnology, College of Animal Bioscience and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Wook (Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Dessie, Tadelle (International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)) ;
  • Kim, Kwan-Suk (Chungbuk National University)
  • Received : 2012.07.07
  • Accepted : 2012.08.20
  • Published : 2012.09.30

Abstract

Although a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified from the bovine genome-sequencing project, few of these have been validated at large in Bos indicus breeds. We have genotyped 192 animals, representing 5 cattle populations of Ethiopia, with the Illumina Bovine 8K SNP BeadChip. These include 1 Sanga (Danakil), 3 zebu (Borana, Arsi and Ambo), and 1 zebu ${\times}$ Sanga intermediate (Horro) breeds. The Hanwoo (Bos taurus) was included for comparison purposes. Analysis of 7,045 SNP markers revealed that the mean minor allele frequency (MAF) was 0.23, 0.22, 0.21, 0.21, 0.23, and 0.29 for Ambo, Arsi, Borana, Danakil, Horro, and Hanwoo, respectively. Significant differences of MAF were observed between the indigenous Ethiopian cattle populations and Hanwoo breed (p < 0.001). Across the Ethiopian cattle populations, a common variant MAF (${\geq}0.10$ and ${\leq}0.5$) accounted for an overall estimated 73.79% of the 7,045 SNPs. The Hanwoo displayed a higher proportion of common variant SNPs (90%). Investigation within Ethiopian cattle populations showed that on average, 16.64% of the markers were monomorphic, but in the Hanwoo breed, only 6% of the markers were monomorphic. Across the sampled Ethiopian cattle populations, the mean observed and expected heterozygosities were 0.314 and 0.313, respectively. The level of SNP variation identified in this particular study highlights that these markers can be potentially used for genetic studies in African cattle breeds.

Keywords

References

  1. Dadi H, Tibbo M, Takahashi Y, Nomura K, Hanada H, Amano T. Microsatellite analysis reveals high genetic diversity but low genetic structure in Ethiopian indigenous cattle populations. Anim Genet 2008;39:425-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01748.x
  2. Li MH, Zerabruk M, Vangen O, Olsaker I, Kantanen J. Reduced genetic structure of north Ethiopian cattle revealed by Y-chromosome analysis. Heredity (Edinb) 2007;98:214-221. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800931
  3. McKay SD, Schnabel RD, Murdoch BM, Matukumalli LK, Aerts J, Coppieters W, et al. An assessment of population structure in eight breeds of cattle using a whole genome SNP panel. BMC Genet 2008;9:37.
  4. Williams JL, Dunner S, Valentini A, Mazza R, Amarger V, Checa ML, et al. Discovery, characterization and validation of single nucleotide polymorphisms within 206 bovine genes that may be considered as candidate genes for beef production and quality. Anim Genet 2009;40:486-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2009.01874.x
  5. Kijas JW, Townley D, Dalrymple BP, Heaton MP, Maddox JF, McGrath A, et al. A genome wide survey of SNP variation reveals the genetic structure of sheep breeds. PLoS One 2009;4:e4668. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004668
  6. Lin BZ, Sasazaki S, Mannen H. Genetic diversity and structure in Bos taurus and Bos indicus populations analyzed by SNP markers. Anim Sci J 2010;81:281-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00744.x
  7. Payne WJA, Wilson RT. An Introduction to Animal Husbandry in the Tropics. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd., 1999.
  8. Kemp S, Mamo Y, Asrat B, Dessie T. Domestic animal genetic resources information system. Addis Ababa: International Livestock Research Institute, 2007. Accessed 2012 Jun 20. Available from: http://dagris.ilri.cgiar.org.
  9. Boichard D, Chung H, Dassonneville R, David X, Eggen A, Fritz S, et al. Design of a bovine low-density SNP array optimized for imputation. PLoS One 2012;7:e34130. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034130
  10. Dadi H, Kim JJ, Yoon D, Kim KS. Evaluation of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) genotyped by the Illumina Bovine SNP50K in cattle focusing on Hanwoo breed. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 2012;25:28-32. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11232
  11. Peakall R, Smouse PE. GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 2006;6:288-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x
  12. Melka HD, Jeon EK, Kim SW, Han JB, Yoon D, Kim KS. Identification of genomic differences between Hanwoo and Holstein breeds using the Illumina Bovine SNP50 BeadChip. Genomics Inform 2011;9:69-73. https://doi.org/10.5808/GI.2011.9.2.69
  13. Gautier M, Faraut T, Moazami-Goudarzi K, Navratil V, Foglio M, Grohs C, et al. Genetic and haplotypic structure in 14 European and African cattle breeds. Genetics 2007;177:1059-1070. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.075804
  14. Carruthers CR, Plante Y, Schmutz SM. Comparison of Angus cattle populations using gene variants and microsatellites. Can J Anim Sci 2011;91:81-85. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJAS10058

Cited by

  1. Genome-wide Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Analyses Reveal Genetic Diversity and Structure of Wild and Domestic Cattle in Bangladesh vol.27, pp.10, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14160
  2. A novel genetic variant database for Korean native cattle (Hanwoo): HanwooGDB vol.37, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-014-0224-7
  3. Determination of Genetic Structure and Signatures of Selection in Three Strains of Tanzania Shorthorn Zebu, Boran and Friesian Cattle by Genome-Wide SNP Analyses vol.12, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171088
  4. Evaluation of Bovine High-Density SNP Genotyping Array in Indigenous Dairy Cattle Breeds pp.1532-2378, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2017.1329150
  5. Genetic diversities and population structures of four popular Myanmar local cattle breeds pp.13443941, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13112